| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
5421. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Take a second and ask yourself how we organize corp battles. We have a ton of members who all want a piece of the actions - but we like winning, and our vets want to be in every match. With only 8 people allow how does ZionTCD organize all the tea...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:58:00
|
5422. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
General Tiberius1 wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: lol If I wasn't hoarding SP and being useless this build I'd of been pissed I missed out on this. you're hoarding? you're still a better havy then me I've got over a million SP hoarded up
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:52:00
|
5423. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Crimson Moon V wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Free Beers wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: 4447 wrote: that wasn't zion's A TEAM. So they substituted one fat man for another? What Zionshad doesnt think you are good enough to fight in corp battle...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:30:00
|
5424. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Pays 2 Win wrote: 4447 wrote: that wasn't zion's A TEAM. So they substituted one fat man for another? What Zionshad doesnt think you are good enough to fight in corp battles? zion's A team left and formed their...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 21:22:00
|
5425. ZionTCD beat Seraphim Initiative. in Back to Back CBs - in General Discussions [original thread]
lol If I wasn't hoarding SP and being useless this build I'd of been pissed I missed out on this.
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:49:00
|
5426. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pays 2 Win wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: You could kick more people for being opinionated and go against everything you all have said about yourselves for half a year to a year now. That should make more threads. Paden's not kickin' up enough dirt...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:30:00
|
5427. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Free Beers wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: So - I hear there's a new Imperfect Effect. If you support heavies on forums you get banned. Great rule ^_^ HowDidThatTaste, run for your life! :O You should have...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:22:00
|
5428. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: So - I hear there's a new Imperfect Effect. If you support heavies on forums you get banned. Great rule ^_^ HowDidThatTaste, run for your life! :O You should have learned from me how to instigate things...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:17:00
|
5429. The Imperfect Effect - in General Discussions [original thread]
So - I hear there's a new Imperfect Effect. If you support heavies on forums you get banned. Great rule ^_^ HowDidThatTaste, run for your life! :O
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 20:01:00
|
5430. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
William HBonney wrote: We aren't far enough into the game, and yet to see what will come, but as of now the heavies and the hmg are a bit much in the way of balance. Problem is that ccp hasn't tweeked anything yet, just bring out the nerf hamme...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:54:00
|
5431. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Imperfects lack of posting in this thread is suspicious.
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:50:00
|
5432. Warravens are NOT OP, they need a buff - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gunner Nightingale wrote: I mean if these corp op threads are gonna pop up, obviously we need the other side of the coin and talk about the ones that need a buff. so here is my choice. Lmao. They'd be my top pick for a buff too.
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:47:00
|
5433. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
William HBonney wrote: A.....bum bum bum....what really happened? I doubt he was kicked for the forum posts alone. I am not a director, but I still love reading that the imperfects lack reason and logic...this game is not based on reason or log...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:42:00
|
5434. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Where did this come from? I am trolling, but you seem confused, and your quotes are off, I never said that lol Really, all I called you guys was tsundere and that's the response I get? This subject is golden :) Careful what you say or Zitro will...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:23:00
|
5435. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Did he make a bad comment bout poor lil regnum and you guys group raged ban? Awe, the imperfects have a tsundere side <3 Never said anything about regnum, who I like a good bit and who is great to pl...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:21:00
|
5436. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gunner Nightingale wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: Gunner Nightingale wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: No, really, Zitro, you gotta post and confirm this, any imperfect. All these post about you guys and this is getting pushed to...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:16:00
|
5437. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'll be trolling Zitro and the imperfects over this for a while if it's true lol
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:10:00
|
5438. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Paran Tadec wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: No, really, Zitro, you gotta post and confirm this, any imperfect. All these post about you guys and this is getting pushed to the side? This is golden info. Was a m...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:08:00
|
5439. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: No, really, Zitro, you gotta post and confirm this, any imperfect. All these post about you guys and this is getting pushed to the side? This is golden info. Was a member really removed for a post even thou...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 05:04:00
|
5440. Logic and reason not allowed in the imperfects - in General Discussions [original thread]
No, really, Zitro, you gotta post and confirm this, any imperfect. All these post about you guys and this is getting pushed to the side? This is golden info. Was a member really removed for a post even though you guys post how un-butt hurt you are...
- by SoTa PoP - at 2013.02.04 04:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |