| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1261. CCP WANTS YOU !!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
HiddenBrother wrote: HTFU? No. Makes an OP Tank thread. Goes back to shooting Soma with Mass driver. Why don't you read a real OP tank thread A real balance thread
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 14:56:00
|
1262. Why tanks are OP (real reason) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Tanks were killing stupid AV in 1.6 as well. AV is not supposed to be balanced around stupid people. Now I have been saying for a while that the Forge Gun seems to be well balanced, but this morning I took my Proto Forge Gun a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 14:48:00
|
1263. reserved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: They've already dramatically changed tanks. Why would they do it again because infantry didn't like it the first time? They did dramatically change tanks, but they are FAR from finished. As CCP stated themselves, they str...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:48:00
|
1264. The fix for MLT tanks, as said by a tanker - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spkr4theDead wrote: Increase heat buildup for MLT mods, because as is the case with all things MLT, they're clunky and require more resources. So, make them build up more heat when they're activated. I don't use missiles too often, very situati...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:40:00
|
1265. ccp sux ass - in General Discussions [original thread]
knight of 6 wrote: is anyone else concerned that **** is censored but fucks is not? Holy fucks
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:13:00
|
1266. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Blaze Ashra wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Full support. I love your threads now. Just a simple idea for the 2 types of rails: the AI one has lower range, a larger clip, higher splash damage/larger radius, and lower direct damage. The AV ...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:10:00
|
1267. reserved - in General Discussions [original thread]
Takahiro Kashuken wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Taka I can't begin to describe to you how uneducated your responses are. I know your stance, I've seen a lot of posts you have made, and they are ALWAYS the same. Use some damn sense man. For example....
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 13:05:00
|
1268. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: message from Godin: no, it is not the smae idea as you had. Both blasters are useless. 200-250 meters, and 350-400 meters are neither useless, although those damage values are. Short range should have old compressed stat...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 02:49:00
|
1269. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the changes you proposed a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 01:40:00
|
1270. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sole Fenychs wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: I think the answer is both. I'm not finished yet, there is still a lot of subject matter to cover. But yes, both, all turrets need variants that help define the given role. Among those variants, you wil...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:54:00
|
1271. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: [ I think we can agree that our ideas are pretty much the same. It's how we go about getting there that differs. I simply do not think the changes you proposed are extreme enough one way or another. Let's...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:51:00
|
1272. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: True Adamance wrote: Anti Infantry Large Turrets need to go. Racial Parity between Empire Main Battle Cannon Style Turrets need to happen. Give HAV a role. Make them the top en...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:48:00
|
1273. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: True Adamance wrote: Anti Infantry Large Turrets need to go. Racial Parity between Empire Main Battle Cannon Style Turrets need to happen. Give HAV a role. Make them the top end Anti Vehicle weapons. Put Anti Infantry a...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:29:00
|
1274. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.29 00:26:00
|
1275. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: Tebu Gan wrote: Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% tracking speed reduction...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:54:00
|
1276. Are Tankers enjoying tanks? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I have ideas for turrets, and how tanks and infantry should interact. Which can be summed up as support roles. Tanks SUPPORT infantry Infantry SUPPORT tanks Which means tanks assist more with kills against infantry, than outright killing infant...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:33:00
|
1277. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: I don't think there is a problem with turrets atm they seem fine I'm sure the other variants will be back when they are ready. I think it will be proto lvl tanks that take advantage of the other variants of turrets because the...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:26:00
|
1278. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roger Cordill wrote: The blaster turrets idea is horrible. I never understood the "blaster turrets are OP against infantry, make them useless" thing. All they need is a 20-30%% tracking speed reduction(maybe more if needed, and a 25% ROF reduct...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 23:20:00
|
1279. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
The legend345 wrote: this is stupid lol No, yr stupid. lol
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 22:39:00
|
1280. Tanks - Balancing Turrets - in General Discussions [original thread]
Darken-Soul wrote: Didn't we have variants pre1.7? I liked my missles cycled and my blasters scattered. If I had to use a rail I liked compressed. We did! That's something forgotten when people go to discussing tanks. Often times, you forget...
- by Tebu Gan - at 2014.01.28 21:47:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |