| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
401. Proposed Proficiency changes (being an effective killer in 1.8) - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALPHA DECRIPTER wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: -OP Snip- Nah, I have pro 1 in SMG but no other weapon and I can kill just fine even without damage mods. If you are an assault and you can't kill with a rifle then, I'm sorry to say it but, you ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 19:53:00
|
402. Proposed Proficiency changes (being an effective killer in 1.8) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Logi Bro wrote: You are assuming the proficiency will increase the stat the weapon is already good at, but what if it makes up for its weaknesses by increasing the damage against the tank type it does less damage against? That is not what th...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 19:31:00
|
403. Proposed Proficiency changes (being an effective killer in 1.8) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: The proficiency change is still a "maybe" as far as I know. Maybe they'll hold off on that to see how the other damage changes go first? I hope so, because as it stands now, it looks to be like it will foster some pretty te...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 19:12:00
|
404. Proposed Proficiency changes (being an effective killer in 1.8) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mordecai Sanguine wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: I am a little concerned about the proposed changes to the proficiency skill in 1.8. The skill will no longer buff damage across a weapon's damage spectrum, instead, it will now buff either damage ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 19:01:00
|
405. Proposed Proficiency changes (being an effective killer in 1.8) - in General Discussions [original thread]
I am a little concerned about the proposed changes to the proficiency skill in 1.8. The skill will no longer buff damage across a weapon's damage spectrum, instead, it will now buff either damage to shields or armor, based on the weapon's profile....
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 18:33:00
|
406. Assault class bonus should be individuated - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Assaults are about offensive capabilities, therefore they should have bonuses to increase weapon effectiveness. HP related things fit better on sentinels, not assaults. The Minmatar (migh...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 16:56:00
|
407. It's time for Gallente freedoms and democracy and stuff - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Democracy is for the week! Fixed it for ya. Soon the be voted out anyway.
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 12:39:00
|
408. Top sprinting speed in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
With all factors calculate it would be exactly 11.128 meters per second with three complex kin cats. I don't feel like writing out the equation cause it is long, so you'll just have to take my word for it.
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 03:53:00
|
409. Blueberry Holocaust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1171 Aajli wrote: JadeoftheStone wrote: They deserve worse than a petty genocide. Oh, and only white people should play too right? Lol. Lolwut? Really dude? You should probably just do th world a favor and eat a bullet.
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 02:08:00
|
410. Blueberry Holocaust - in General Discussions [original thread]
TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You would think the blueberries would shoot a red uplink rather than stand 10m away with their backs to it. Seriously? ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 02:03:00
|
411. Blueberry Holocaust - in General Discussions [original thread]
TYCHUS MAXWELL wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You would think the blueberries would shoot a red uplink rather than stand 10m away with their backs to it. Seriously? You would expect this? I lost all my illusions a...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 01:36:00
|
412. Please CCP... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Big Burns wrote: All I want for my birthday is Player Market. Oh, and zero lag in PC. Oh, and PVE. And new maps/weapons/content in general/ etc. And, and...destroy the Rail Rifle. And last but not least, for the love of everything that is holy ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 00:27:00
|
413. Mass Drivers to receive damage buff in 1.8 - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaughst wrote: KA24DERT wrote: I do appreciate the buff, but do we really need TTK to be any lower? I feel the Mass Driver damage is pretty good where it is, but that the rifles are just overpowered. I feel the same way...still...I have ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.09 00:08:00
|
414. Blueberry Holocaust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: You would think the blueberries would shoot a red uplink rather than stand 10m away with their backs to it. Seriously? You would expect this? I lost all my illusions about blues back at the beginning of chromosome, ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 23:02:00
|
415. I gave in. - in General Discussions [original thread]
TEXA5 HiTM4N wrote: I started using FOTM. stacking complex damage mods and armor plates on a rail rifle with aim assist. I see why everyone uses it. every game is around 27-3, even against other people using FOTM. getting hate mail about it, bu...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 22:36:00
|
416. No Response From Devs. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Onesimus Tarsus wrote: Son-Of A-Gun wrote: WUT ANG wrote: With all of the Changes the Buffs, Nerfs and Additions deserving a Refund. And all the respect, refund threads floating around I wish CCP would atleast respond to one of them just ...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 22:20:00
|
417. No Response From Devs. - in General Discussions [original thread]
RKKR wrote: Sorry that our auto-correct keeps correcting respec to respect, go read a novel if you are interested in correct grammar use. Two time, two times! That's all it takes to make your autocorrect stop correcting it wrong. All you hav...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 22:16:00
|
418. No Response From Devs. - in General Discussions [original thread]
WUT ANG wrote: With all of the Changes the Buffs, Nerfs and Additions deserving a Refund. And all the respect, refund threads floating around I wish CCP would atleast respond to one of them just to show their listening and or thinking about it....
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 21:55:00
|
419. Assault class bonus should be individuated - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaughst wrote: I like the idea of giving the assault classes a EHP/repair/shield recharge buffs instead of weapon based. Me too.
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 21:14:00
|
420. The actual shield/armor imbalance... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Here's the thing: The basic plates are actually the only plates worth using. Enhanced +25 HP from 85 to110, really? And let's not even start to talk about the variant plates. The complex extenders are actually the only extenders worth using. Bas...
- by Son-Of A-Gun - at 2014.02.08 21:11:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |