| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
821. Ps4 head count - in General Discussions [original thread]
PC/PS4. We preserve the console player population and open up Dust to a new demographic. More players benefits everyone.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.17 18:11:00
|
822. People Are Leaving Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Press Attache wrote: Or people join a good corp, and wait for jabber pings to log in for dank pew pew. People power in EvE is even more important than in dust. I live in low sec though, so pew pew is only ever a jump away. You are probably ri...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.16 15:36:00
|
823. MATCHMAKER - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vrain Matari wrote: ^Also the ability for players to leave matches and the frequency with which we do so make the efforts of the matchmaker meaningless. Forgot to mention this part... leaving matches is a problem. Also, once a match has starte...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.16 14:48:00
|
824. MATCHMAKER - in General Discussions [original thread]
HOLY PERFECTION wrote: TOTAL TIME IN GAME TOTAL SP GAINED ACTIVELY IIRC, matchmaking is based on WP/sec in match, KDR, and W/L. The problem isn't the matchmaker, it's with the player population. It doesn't matter how good your matchmaker is i...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.16 14:16:00
|
825. People Are Leaving Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Operative 1174 Uuali wrote: it's a sh*t game too that caters to the few lame nerds that want it their way. Eve is a great game... for those able to spend 3+ hours each evening to find things to do in it.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.16 14:09:00
|
826. People Are Leaving Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
I track the concurrent login stats on Eve Offline. When Warlords 1.2 dropped on July 7th our 1 year average concurrent logins sat at 2,333. As of today that number sits at 2,132. A 201 player difference in 101 days. The Amarr Challenge event did s...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.16 12:35:00
|
827. Anyone with a twitter account please read - in General Discussions [original thread]
benandjerrys wrote: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6101945#post6101945 Finally done. Cappys keep that bumped plz till locked. The EvE forum post is now my signature Thanks for doing that, Ben. I don't have an active E...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.16 12:26:00
|
828. Incorruptibles addresses T.H.I.R.D.R.O.C.K - in General Discussions [original thread]
T.H.I.R.D.R.O.C.K, What is your favorite cat picture and why is it this one ?
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.15 19:29:00
|
829. Anyone with a twitter account please read - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: ... if only I had a Twitter account... but no, the world is not ready, and I cannot be confined to 140 characters... Fox, you can make a single tweet with for #PortDust514. I know you can.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.15 17:55:00
|
830. Anyone with a twitter account please read - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Any progress from this campaign at all? Various CCP employees have taken notice including Rattati and Hilmar (CCP's CEO). CPM2 let us know that CCP is monitoring the campaign and likes what they see. If you want to help ou...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.15 17:06:00
|
831. Bandwith - has it made the game better? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Juno Tristan wrote: Personally I'm not a fan as there's no more omni soldier action, plus the lack of supply depot clusterfucks hasn't really helped with lag. "Omni-soldier action" was one of the reasons bandwidth was deployed, and I am happy ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.15 13:18:00
|
832. It is time! DUST Port. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bump ZED Regent wrote: if i had twitter, i would also join with that hashtag-thing.... You can sign in with gmail, if you have a gmail address.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.14 14:39:00
|
833. @CCP Tell us the truth about DUST 514's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
TooMany Names AlreadyTaken wrote: What will happen? Will it die? Will it get ported? One of the goals of the #PortDust514 movement is to get answers from CCP regarding Dust 514's future. If you have a twitter account and a moment, please tweet...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.14 14:37:00
|
834. can we get some pubs that are not only dom - in General Discussions [original thread]
E-Rock wrote: LOL. I love these guys that are telling me that I need to make sure that I have toggled the game modes I wanna play in the battle finder. read the post. Since this "matchmaking" happened back in April, I CAN'T get another pub cont...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 16:56:00
|
835. 50 Million Paid Bounty - Saxonmish - in General Discussions [original thread]
jett it wrote: I dont hate sax guys I actually like his vids and playing style as well. This was just a death receipt, bottom line. My way of being paid. Neither Arkena or I accused you of hating Saxon... we accused you of not being able tell ...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 15:43:00
|
836. 50 Million Paid Bounty - Saxonmish - in General Discussions [original thread]
jett it wrote: Sax look out you have some traders and haters in your corp that want to see you burn and fail. "Traitors" and haters, jett...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 15:23:00
|
837. [Discussion/Theorycrafting] Swarm Launchers and Variants - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nirwanda Vaughns wrote: I just want Gallente Swarms. i mean ffs just reskin a PLC and use the swarm animation/mechanic and have them higher damage vs shields. When it comes to Vehicles and AV we'll never have true balance until we get shield ba...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 12:29:00
|
838. Now that shield tanking is in a healthy spot... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: That mostly stems from the percentage based nature of shield regen modules, IMHO. A buff of a couple of points on the base wouldn't change much as dropsuit armour repair modules, the primary source of regeneration for ar...
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 12:05:00
|
839. Now that shield tanking is in a healthy spot... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: What is that intended to achieve? I believe it is intended to slightly reduce the gap in repair times between armor and shields.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 11:58:00
|
840. Now that shield tanking is in a healthy spot... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vitharr Foebane wrote: (i.e. double strafe penalty) I'm all for examining armor for viability in this new shield tank meta, but no. Just no. Strafing in all it's forms needs to stay dead.
- by Ripley Riley - at 2015.10.13 11:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |