| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 |
121. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
J'Jor Da'Wg wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: ReGnUM DEl wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.04 00:32:00
|
122. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nic Warlom wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: I can't believe you fell for this "Nic Warlom" dude! Seriously, bro. I'm new to this whole "trolling" thing. Guys, I actually only just found out what it was! But it should be pretty obvious to most by ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.04 00:30:00
|
123. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Icy TIG3R wrote: Nic Warlom wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so here's the deal Ric Bar...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.04 00:24:00
|
124. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnYuM wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: ReGnUM DEl wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so here...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.04 00:12:00
|
125. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
ReGnUM DEl wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so here's the deal Ric Barlom style: If you e...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.04 00:02:00
|
126. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
semperfi1999 wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so here's the deal Ric Barlom style: If you...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 23:51:00
|
127. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Nic Warlom wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so here's the deal Ric Barlom style: If you e...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 23:43:00
|
128. One of the Reasons I'm Still with Dust - in General Discussions [original thread]
Guys, I'm gonna lay it down for you simply. I've put the long version out there but some of you would probably find it unbrearable to read more than 100 words so here's the deal Ric Barlom style: If you enjoy playing the game RIGHT NOW, keep play...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 23:37:00
|
129. CCP Shamelessly Tries To Make Some Quick Pocket Change With Pay-To-Win (Fused Lo... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Moejoe Omnipotent wrote: Dust HaHakoke wrote: I repeat the fused grenades actually require you to aim at long range and not very accurately Because tossing your grenades across the map is the most effective way of using them... Are you ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 23:29:00
|
130. Some perspective for the "fail" crowd out there - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: KING SALASI wrote: See the ps3 console community doesn't know CCP, they know EA, Ubisoft, Activison Etc... Basically console developers. They have no clue there use to day one dlc, $60 retail price, $150 special edition, a...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 21:13:00
|
131. Common sense question about the tank situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Djheffer wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Tanks are weak, but as ranged killers, they don't fair so bad. It's like equipping a Militia Suit with a Duvolle tac really, strong enough but will die fast. The issue is price is f...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 21:12:00
|
132. Common sense question about the tank situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The overall problem with tanks is that tanks is they don't feel tanky enough Well let me just put it out there for you guys that there has never been in human history a ba...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:47:00
|
133. Some perspective for the people who think the game sucks, yet keep playing it - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spaceman-Rob wrote: This game does not suck, I'm a big battlefield fan, yet I choose everyday to play this instead, this is my no1 most played game, and has been for months. That's exactly what I've been doing. Note that I'm not saying the g...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:33:00
|
134. *CCP Fails yet again* (Proof in the OP) (Negative SP) - in General Discussions [original thread]
semperfi1999 wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Didn't I make a thread about this type of behaviour the other day. Oh yeah I did. Some perspective for the "fail" crowd out there. LOL CCP fanbois are hilarious. Equating RL to video games. Well ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:31:00
|
135. Some perspective for the "fail" crowd out there - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alaika Arbosa wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: We all know that the word "fail" is used extensively in a lot of online communities, guys. Stuff like: u fail. fail this. fail that. epic fail. People like to call others out when they don't succeed on ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:29:00
|
136. *CCP Fails yet again* (Proof in the OP) (Negative SP) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Didn't I make a thread about this type of behaviour the other day. Oh yeah I did. Some perspective for the "fail" crowd out there.
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:24:00
|
137. So who attacked CCP? - in General Discussions [original thread]
My guess is... The Guy Who Says Everything Two Or Three Times
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:21:00
|
138. Common sense question about the tank situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Jason Pearson wrote: Tanks need to be able to fit Standard Modules without needing PG/CPU modules. Once that's done, we need Advanced and Prototype Tanks, as well as Advanced and Prototype Enforcer,...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 18:12:00
|
139. Common sense question about the tank situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Jason Pearson wrote: Tanks need to be able to fit Standard Modules without needing PG/CPU modules. Once that's done, we need Advanced and Prototype Tanks, as well as Advanced and Prototype Enforcer, Marauder and Covert Ops tanks. Agreed.
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 17:56:00
|
140. Common sense question about the tank situation - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: The overall problem with tanks is that tanks is they don't feel tanky enough Well let me just put it out there for you guys that there has never been in human history a battlefield situation where a "tanky tank" is uti...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.06.03 17:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |