Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
281. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Paran Tadec wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well, guys, this is an interesting question and many have been wondering who exactly was behind this whole sabotage thing. Well I started my own investigation immediately after the incident and confirmed ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 22:02:00
|
282. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eltra Ardell wrote: So this is Forum PvP, huh? Neat. DUST gets more like EVE every day hour. Nothing too serious, bro. Was just busting people's balls a little bit so to speak.
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 16:23:00
|
283. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
So guys, ever since I posted in this thread, I've been receiving a lot of negative feedback both in game and in these forums so I decided to make a little follow up statement, man. First of all, let me apologise to all those people out there who g...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 15:17:00
|
284. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Alright everyone, this has gotten totally out of hand so I had to upload the tapes, guys, and keep in mind that it was you who forced my hand. That being said, I take no responsibility of the ramification...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 11:16:00
|
285. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Medic 1879 wrote: EDIT'd ^ Video doesn't work but it says what it is lol. Well no worries I've got a transcript of this nefarious conversation that occurred middle of last night EVE time: We're no strangers to love You know the rules and s...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 11:11:00
|
286. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alright everyone, this has gotten totally out of hand so I had to upload the tapes, guys, and keep in mind that it was you who forced my hand. That being said, I take no responsibility of the ramifications of this revelation: Let me present the ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:54:00
|
287. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well here's the thing, dude, and let me be perfectly clear with you here so that even you can understand where I'm coming from here. I'm not asking anyone to tr...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:15:00
|
288. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well here's the thing, dude, and let me be perfectly clear with you here so that even you can understand where I'm coming from here. I'm not asking anyone to trust me, but I did paint a picture for every...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:13:00
|
289. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: But... you haven't said anything... anyone can claim anything they want - without proof it's obvious bull. I know you were raised u...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 10:07:00
|
290. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: But... you haven't said anything... anyone can claim anything they want - without proof it's obvious bull. I know you were raised under a rock but come on. Thanks for trying...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:59:00
|
291. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: But... you haven't said anything... anyone can claim anything they want - without proof it's obvious bull. I know you were raised under a rock but come on. Thanks for trying though. Reminds me when you were saying your a...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:52:00
|
292. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: And yet another dodge so you don't have to admit you have no evidence and are basing everything on assumptions you read on the forums....
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:44:00
|
293. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: And yet another dodge so you don't have to admit you have no evidence and are basing everything on assumptions you read on the forums. :) Spies are for more then sabotage scrub. I'...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:36:00
|
294. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: And yet another dodge so you don't have to admit you have no evidence and are basing everything on assumptions you read on the forums. :) Spies are for more then sabotage scrub. I'm glad you want E-fame through us but try t...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:29:00
|
295. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well unlike you, bro, I'm acting perfectly professionally here, and I don't plan to get my account banned anytime soon either. Cause let me tell you something r...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:24:00
|
296. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa of PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: Well unlike you, bro, I'm acting perfectly professionally here, and I don't plan to get my account banned anytime soon either. Cause let me tell you something right now. Naming and shaming is not only ag...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:16:00
|
297. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: You got a problem with an alt? Let me fill you in *love your speech patterns* My main is BANNED. So QQ all you want - I can't ...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 09:03:00
|
298. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: Ric Barlom wrote: SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: You got a problem with an alt? Let me fill you in *love your speech patterns* My main is BANNED. So QQ all you want - I can't post on it. Secondly - all you said is you did...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 08:58:00
|
299. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
2-Ton Twenty-One wrote: IKR Its the Donald trump Obama birth certificate play I have a ton of evidence!- trump lets see it-media Obamas birth certificate i have been doing allot of research and found some surprising things!- trump What thin...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 08:55:00
|
300. The imps must behind the sabatage crews? - in General Discussions [original thread]
SoTa ReGnUM PoP wrote: You got a problem with an alt? Let me fill you in *love your speech patterns* My main is BANNED. So QQ all you want - I can't post on it. Secondly - all you said is you did research and discovered something then explain...
- by Ric Barlom - at 2013.05.18 08:51:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |