| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
661. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ZDub 303 wrote: Damage in cqc is fine as it is. Have you ever snuck behind someone who isn't moving and put every bullet into them with a not tac ar weapon? They go down in an instant. Don't buff cqc damage, buff cqc hit detection. For some r...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 13:27:00
|
662. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar's Alt wrote: Jathniel wrote: I'm not defending the TAR so much so as I'm drawing a complaint against clunkiness of controls and TTK in CQC mechanics. The TAR, with it's current iteration, compensates for Dust's failure in both of th...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 13:14:00
|
663. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Jathniel wrote: I'm not defending the TAR so much so as I'm drawing a complaint against clunkiness of controls and TTK in CQC mechanics. The TAR, with it's current iteration, compensates for Dust's failure in both of thes...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 13:06:00
|
664. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Jathniel wrote: "CODification". lol... (English is a wonderful language isn't it. Enabling the coining of all sorts of words. Humor me more.) Lower TTK doesn't necessarily need increased regen. With Dust, both depends on...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 13:00:00
|
665. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
P Nasty wrote: My personal view is that the issue of the TAR is that yes, it puts people down too quickly. With the consequences of dying and losing cash in place plus all the upgrades we make to survivability, a weapon should not put someone d...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:57:00
|
666. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Che Cortez wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: Jathniel wrote: The whole argument is NOT built on such a premise. It is not wrong, nor is it invalid. . Comparisons were made with BF3, not for arguing that Dust be exactly like it, but for the sake...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:41:00
|
667. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Yes it is. Grow up. Malkai Inos wrote: Jathniel wrote: Che Cortez wrote: Kenderr, did he say 1-2 shots? Your assuming, that shield Nd armor wouldn't matter, if the Time to kill is decreased by tweaking weap...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:34:00
|
668. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
kenderr cillo wrote: So u want to kill people with 1 or 2 shots... so Why make Fittings? Why armour and Shield? Why more weapons? Everyone with the same armour and a tactical rifle. Sorry but all your statement is stupid No my friend. Snip...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:23:00
|
669. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar's Alt wrote: Jathniel wrote: Ignoring the fact that the tactical doesn't blow up tanks, and there are a myriad other weapons that are far more potent against infantry than a tank's blasters, i'll get back on topic. Dust is a squad-...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:19:00
|
670. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Malkai Inos wrote: Jathniel wrote: Ignoring the fact that the tactical doesn't blow up tanks, and there are a myriad other weapons that are far more potent against infantry than a tank's blasters, i'll get back on topic. Dust is a squad-b...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:11:00
|
671. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Che Cortez wrote: Kenderr, did he say 1-2 shots? Your assuming, that shield Nd armor wouldn't matter, if the Time to kill is decreased by tweaking weapons, dmg, spread and dispersion ( u can't just increase base dmg of the weapons collectively ...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:07:00
|
672. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zeylon Rho wrote: I'm inclined to say that we're NOT supposed to be like Battlefield players in terms of taking hits, or any "modern" shooter. People are fleshbags, and they die easily. It makes sense that a blast of pretty much any weapon will...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 12:05:00
|
673. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar's Alt wrote: I'll just leave this here. (please direct all +1s to Exmaple Core) Exmaple Core wrote: As you all know, this weapon is the go to weapon for noobs, casuals, ringers, hardcore players, CPMs, pubs, PC, ect. We all bickered...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 11:58:00
|
674. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
IamI3rian wrote: Jathniel wrote: It's FUN to use the tactical, because you can put your enemy down fast... ...and herein lies the problem. This is a squad based game, and like it or not if you're any good you're moving with at LEAST one...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 11:45:00
|
675. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Please understand. I'm not saying adjustments should't be made to the tactical. The tactical AR wasn't really the point of my post. I was trying to address the mechanic of targets being hard to hit AND being hard to kill. I used the tactical as ...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 11:38:00
|
676. (Feedback & Suggestion) I think we're wrong this time. & Better rang... - in General Discussions [original thread]
I've been using the tactical assault rifle for a while. I even used it in it's "broken" state during Chromosome, just because I loved the weapon that much. Or at least, I loved the functionality that I felt it should have. I've noticed that the t...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 11:07:00
|
677. Some perspective for the people who think the game sucks, yet keep playing it - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ric Barlom wrote: SoTah Pawp wrote: Uprising shocked a lot of us. I used to have much faith in this game - but now a days It feels like that faith is hanging by a thread. If that offends you - sorry - but I am allowed to speak my mind. And...
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 09:13:00
|
678. Some perspective for the people who think the game sucks, yet keep playing it - in General Discussions [original thread]
Words of wisdom from the, OP. lol "cunty" I like that word.... +1
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.31 09:10:00
|
679. who else went negative ? can you beat me? - in General Discussions [original thread]
yeah that's game breaking... you're looking at one full month of free fits. IF you do 50 ambushes a day.... or just send in a HD ticket, and try to get your equipment liquidized.
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.30 13:42:00
|
680. Perhaps the most hilarious Dust moment I've ever seen - in General Discussions [original thread]
That was good. +1.
- by Jathniel - at 2013.05.30 09:40:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |