| Pages: [1] |
1. Shield Tanks vs Armor Tanks and tanks in general - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Alena Ventrallis wrote: I think hardeners need to go back to their old values and have a fitting restriction of one per vehicle. Screw that noise, modules I wish would go back to pre 1.6 where variety was possible an...
- by Ilkazar - at 2014.06.24 22:33:00
|
2. Shield Tanks vs Armor Tanks and tanks in general - in General Discussions [original thread]
Atiim wrote: Ilkazar wrote: the only change should be to increase the resistance values on armor hardeners. No, because that would break AV vs Vehicle balance. Not if the change was balanced I am only talking bring the value from 30% t...
- by Ilkazar - at 2014.06.24 22:18:00
|
3. Shield Tanks vs Armor Tanks and tanks in general - in General Discussions [original thread]
Hello everyone this is just to give my opinion on the current tanking situation, I have 22 million SP in tanks/vehicles so I think its safe to say I can test almost all the features of them. TL;DR- Shield tanks are now viable, and the weapons are...
- by Ilkazar - at 2014.06.24 22:11:00
|
4. Armored warfware - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lurchasaurus wrote: you need to reevaluate your understanding of tank turrets. its not a difference of 20-30 dps....its a difference of 20-30 damage a shot, with about 7 shots a second on a blaster. the difference is a lot more than a few poi...
- by Ilkazar - at 2013.05.21 09:08:00
|
5. Armored warfware - in General Discussions [original thread]
CharCharOdell wrote: Snaps Tremor wrote: Reality: Troops go first, clear out AV units, tanks move in. Chromosome: WOOOOO CAN'T TOUCH THIS CHECK IT OUT FIFTY KILLS NO DEATHS IT'S BRITNEY BITCHES Uprising: Troops go first, clear out AV unit...
- by Ilkazar - at 2013.05.21 05:12:00
|
6. To all true tanks.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Full Metal Kitten wrote: AV checking in. Shield or armor? Who cares. You both provide a gratifying explosion when you go boom. We scrubs also enjoy the run with tail tucked between legs while chassis in flames maneuver. Agreed Althou...
- by Ilkazar - at 2013.05.21 04:59:00
|
7. The Dropship situation. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shijima Kuraimaru wrote: Um yeah. I like your post except for one thing. FGs don't lock onto target. They're entirely manual aim. So if they let the DS have a warning that a FG is aimed at them, then troopers should get a warning any time any...
- by Ilkazar - at 2013.05.21 04:43:00
|
8. The Dropship situation. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Coming from both sides of the argument having both a character that runs vehicles including DS and a character that is heavily speced into FG AV I know how this feels from both sides. On one hand we have the DS that is supposed to be used by a t...
- by Ilkazar - at 2013.05.20 08:25:00
|
9. Tanks in assault matches - in General Discussions [original thread]
I don't ever post but wow when I read this it makes me sad, cry some more about how you lost a match to a good tanker. I have two characters that I max out every week so I run both good vehicles and AV, and i'll give you the perspective of both. Y...
- by Ilkazar - at 2013.05.20 08:07:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |