| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
1261. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alpha 443-6732 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: We can all agree that heavy armor is well, heavy and should slow you down. Shields are weightless and should not weigh anything. shields need to be faster. In eve, gallenete are second fastest and c...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 03:35:00
|
1262. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Yes, one V one situations. tanks need to be balanced for 1v1 because that also effects times when ppl intervine. For Exmaple: What if the stronger tank recives help against the unbalanced, weaker tank?...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 03:34:00
|
1263. Heavies need two nade slots - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sadly i disagree, 2 grenade slots jus adds to the heavys ability to own face and they already own all the face. Other qualitys of the suit should be improved instead
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 03:17:00
|
1264. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: Shield tanks are disgustingly underpowered this build, the distance between these two tanks are too much to even consider going sheild tanks. for Exmaple, i have 15.5 million SP into sheild tanks and have literally everythin...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 03:13:00
|
1265. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cody Sietz wrote: Another way to truly fix vehicles is to make mods that only fit to certain vehicles. Tanks would get there own set of mods, so would dropships and lavs. Why? So CCP can adjust mods and cpu/pg usage accordingly. No more fi...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 03:04:00
|
1266. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Cosgar wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: .... Passive shield tanking needs to become viable on vehicles. I agree, and it should be done on shield tanks and not armor tanks. Vice versa for active tanking,...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 03:03:00
|
1267. loltankers - in General Discussions [original thread]
Void Echo wrote: SENATOR KODOS wrote: Stop calling yourself tankers. Its embarrassing to witness. who is this towards? towards anyone trying to tank in Uprising. particularly shield tanks
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 02:58:00
|
1268. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dr Allopathy wrote: Tanks do not need to be balanced 1v1. If everything was balanced 1v1 (shield vs armor, different weapons etc) then there would be no need for tactics ingame. Point and shoot like everyone else. Stop the QQ. You guys move ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 02:54:00
|
1269. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: .... Passive shield tanking needs to become viable on vehicles. I agree, and it should be done on shield tanks and not armor tanks. Vice versa for active tanking, like it is now
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 02:47:00
|
1270. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vyzion Eyri wrote: Are all you tankers talking about tank vs. tank, in a 1v1 situation? I'd like the point of view of tankers who have (semi-)dedicated tank crews who stick with the tank with repair tools and AV weapons to add their voices to ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 02:46:00
|
1271. Tired of Armor v Shield Tanking (Actual Tanks, gtfo Dropsuits) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Shield tanks are disgustingly underpowered this build, the distance between these two tanks are too much to even consider going sheild tanks. for Exmaple, i have 15.5 million SP into sheild tanks and have literally everything maxed out that matter...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.10 02:24:00
|
1272. Pilot dropsuit stacking? - in General Discussions [original thread]
The dark cloud wrote: I was thinking about one of the old quotes in terms about if passanger skills affect the vehicle performence (dameg on turrets etc.) So my concern is that the pilot dropsuit could stack with itself. Like you get 3 guys wit...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 20:21:00
|
1273. Occupy New Eden!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chimichanga66605 wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Ana Mosity wrote: Changes will always happen. Tweaks will always be made because people will always cry nerf and say someone else has it better. The only people that may ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 20:12:00
|
1274. Occupy New Eden!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: People should probably just stop providing feedback all together and AFK in the MCC like any good EVE player. Dat Metagame. yes, afterall, spying is part of the metagame and were is a better spying point than the mcc?
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 20:10:00
|
1275. were supposed to be getting anit-air tanks next. why? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chunky Munkey wrote: Let assault dropships whack swarm launchers on their front turret, THEN we can have a discussion about AA tanks. Even if the DS gets buffed enough to be a force again rails and expescially the OP forge gun will OHK your ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 20:07:00
|
1276. Occupy New Eden!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Exmaple Core wrote: Ana Mosity wrote: Changes will always happen. Tweaks will always be made because people will always cry nerf and say someone else has it better. The only people that may ever deserve a respec are heavies. Not because of ...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 20:03:00
|
1277. Occupy New Eden!!! - in General Discussions [original thread]
StubbyDucky wrote: Reported Good Day Sir *Tips Hat* Quote: 3. Ranting is prohibited. A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of com...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 20:03:00
|
1278. were supposed to be getting anit-air tanks next. why? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: For the same reason that we need a Bomber Dropship, duh. hahah, yeah when that comes out ill still one hit it in my railgun from a distance were my spool speed dont matter
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 19:58:00
|
1279. were supposed to be getting anit-air tanks next. why? - in General Discussions [original thread]
dropships are litterally the worst investment of dust atm and no tank, rail to missle has difficulty destroying them now. Why do we need a tank specifically made to destroy these flying poops? no one is going to skill into them, or dropships
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 19:50:00
|
1280. More 3x SP no respects - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: Exmaple Core wrote: Your even worse off than tanks. a shame, right? Im pretty done with hoping, CCP does listen to us and they will read this. with some luck and alittle bit of hope anyway, they will see the light in the po...
- by Exmaple Core - at 2013.07.08 19:42:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |