| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
321. Opinions on EVE ships! Amarrian style. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Go munch on your baguette heathen. I'm curious about the ships that act for the will of the Goddess.
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:30:00
|
322. Opinions on EVE ships! Amarrian style. - in General Discussions [original thread]
If anyone can give me their opinion on the Battleships they use in EVE, it would be greatly appreciated! I'm so indecisive by nature
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:23:00
|
323. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Yup, the irony here is that you're still doing the same thing. The joke is on you because you are the frustrated one and your attempts to upset me have failed. I could say the same thing to you, but you obviously wouldn't ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:16:00
|
324. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I truly enjoy purifying the weak miners i come across and running from everything that scares me.... but one day i actually want to experience null sec pvp as a two man operation (my brother alongside me). Are drones actually worth it now to inv...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:12:00
|
325. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
While you are poking around this thread True. What's more bad ass to you EVE wise : A glorious Amarr laser gunboat, or a laser ship using drones? I came back to EVE and noticed all the awesome drones and relevant skills they added. Yet i can'...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:09:00
|
326. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Again, hypocrisy must be the newest "cool". Yes, it is very hilarious I've explained to you why things are the way they are and you refused to believe me. Then ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:07:00
|
327. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: pegasis prime wrote: Loving the show guys keep it up. *munches popcorn and hands True and Collins a can well deserved beer. * Takes the beer.....mmmmm wait what is this? Budwieser? Hmmmmmm chugs beer down. The ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 07:00:00
|
328. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Again, hypocrisy must be the newest "cool". Yes, it is very hilarious I've explained to you why things are the way they are and you refused to believe me. Then you turned to your insult tactic and have...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:56:00
|
329. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dovallis Martan JenusKoll wrote: Duran Lex wrote: I'm not gonna lie, i only read the second paragraph. If you weren't designed to be able to kill both infantry and vehicles with ultimate ease, why is it you can kill both vehicles and infan...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:53:00
|
330. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Ld Collins wrote: You said tanks weren't a support role I'm claiming that they are a support role and are far better at supporting the team rather than just kill...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:42:00
|
331. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alena Ventrallis wrote: Yes, it should absolutely take 3 or more AV to kill my tank. No, my main turret should not be controlled by a second player. No, I should not be able to kill infantry easily with my main turret. Large turrets need to ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:41:00
|
332. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Cotsy8 wrote: 1. Limit the number of tanks on the battlefield. If you wanted to be an ******* about it you can require pilots and a partner. Pilots drive tanks aren't the ones actually shootings he main turret, i know its a...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:39:00
|
333. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Ld Collins wrote: You said tanks weren't a support role I'm claiming that they are a support role and are far better at supporting the team rather than just killing infantry which you are to ignorant to...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:35:00
|
334. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: You said tanks weren't a support role I'm claiming that they are a support role and are far better at supporting the team rather than just killing infantry which you are to ignorant to comprehend. You believe killing infan...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:29:00
|
335. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: HAV's are a SUPPORT role? Hahahahaha. I'll go to sleep on that one. Sorry that you are unwilling to listen but yes tanks are far better at supporting than killi...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:21:00
|
336. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
I'm truly going to sleep now...have been distracted for far too long. Continue though True on claiming i said something i didn't. Continue random guy that I want tanks removed...even though i don't. My posts says it all. A single asset shoul...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:14:00
|
337. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: HAV's are a SUPPORT role? Hahahahaha. I'll go to sleep on that one. Sorry that you are unwilling to listen but yes tanks are far better at supporting than killing. Tanks clear large areas for infantry ...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:09:00
|
338. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
MINA Longstrike wrote: I'm not even going to bother here Duran, you're an argumentative biggot with an axe to grind just looking for a fight because you apparently hate vehicles and want them removed from the game. There is no intelligent discu...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:08:00
|
339. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Look you believe HAV are wholly unbalanced units piloted only by the selfish and mean spirited out to destroy this community and personally "get you"..... I believe that that is not the case, that while vehicle vs AV is unb...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:07:00
|
340. AV vs HAV. My technically repeated opinion. - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ld Collins wrote: Duran Lex wrote: Teamwork kills everything possible in this fuckin game. The issue is : Why should one playstyle require teamwork when the other doesn't? That's the entire problem. One option can kill everything in the dam...
- by Duran Lex - at 2014.04.09 06:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |