| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
441. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Thaddeus Reynolds wrote: Breakin Stuff's Escelation of Force reasoning makes sense from a gameplay perspective...especially if the LAV is made so that it isn't trivial to take out even with AV weaponry I highly doubt he wants to buff its def...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 17:43:00
|
442. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: It seems a little odd to require specialized AV weapons to take out a jeep. That depends, a lot of comparisons here are using "real world" arguments... But in this fictional universe what if the LAV is actually made of the ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 15:03:00
|
443. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Fox Gaden wrote: Derpty Derp wrote: it seems like a bad design decision to allow bullets aimed at the license plate to deal enough damage to disable the whole vehicle, even if it wasn't a super high tech, futuristic vehicle. I would be fi...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 14:51:00
|
444. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Derpty Derp wrote: Living up to your name Quit cherry-picking things and then taking the quote out of context to prove your point. Your arguments have been absolutely one-sided, and you're bluntly not doing anything ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 09:20:00
|
445. DUST 514 NOTICES?? - in General Discussions [original thread]
DUST Fiend wrote: CCP is probably the only company that actively develops games on maybes :/ Pretty sure all game development is maybe until it's released... Even if confirmed to be developed something can be canned.
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 04:08:00
|
446. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I think that DUST requiring Heavy Anti-vehicle options to kill the most basic vehicles set the bar of expectation the wrong way. Swarm launcher, plasma cannon, grenades, remote explosives and proximity mines are all not...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.13 04:03:00
|
447. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dreis ShadowWeaver wrote: By that logic, we should get rid of all ISK so we can reinforce that 'live, die, learn, repeat' thing. Personally, ISK was my favourite part of the game. I loved how for immortal mercenaries, money was the only thing...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.10 16:51:00
|
448. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: Derpty Derp wrote: Breakin Stuff wrote: I have picked pilots out of driver seats with forge guns. Just because it was possible does not mean it was balanced. And troop transport derpships were the best balanced. F...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.09 19:42:00
|
449. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: I have picked pilots out of driver seats with forge guns. Just because it was possible does not mean it was balanced. And troop transport derpships were the best balanced. Forge guns aren't light weapons, I'm talking ju...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.09 18:50:00
|
450. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: And no, LAVs were not the best-balanced vehicle in the game. The equivalent of an Army Hummvee required anti-tank weapons to kill, and cost more than the power armor. Modern solution to a hummvee is "Riddle it with bullets...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.09 16:31:00
|
451. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
Breakin Stuff wrote: One of the stupidest things ever envisioned was making jeeps immune to small arms fire. When the ADS were introduced, for over a year they racked up an AVERAGE K/D rating of 50/1. And people defended this, saying that was...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.09 05:30:00
|
452. Rework ADS, HAVs require main gunner, LAV passengers can shoot, etc - in General Discussions [original thread]
FraggerMike wrote: ADS -- don't think those who fly them well will like the idea of not being able to shoot - makes them more of a Chauffeur. I think you'll find most ads pilots just really liked flying them, if anything having to point tha...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.07 17:13:00
|
453. Vehicles Deserve Better - in General Discussions [original thread]
Remove vehicles and the eve connection, that really never was, from Dust and tell me what it's unique selling point was? Was it the shoddy hit-scan? Dust was interesting due to its attempts to be more strategic than your usual FPS, vehicles may ...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.07 04:25:00
|
454. Vehicles Deserve Better - in General Discussions [original thread]
One Eyed King wrote: The KTM Duke wrote: LOOKMOM NOHANDS wrote: I will say it...... Vehicles killed Dust. If only dev resources that were used on constant balance and design had gone into infantry weapons and map design. If only map...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.06 18:32:00
|
455. Happy 4th fellow Americans! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Marston VC wrote: And the second highest obesity rate! Bad news, according to "teh internetz" you've dropped to 12th... Better get a few more burgers.
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.05 19:27:00
|
456. Vehicles Deserve Better - in General Discussions [original thread]
Pokey Dravon wrote: shaman oga wrote: Mobius Wyvern wrote: shaman oga wrote: They also deserve eject button and locked driving seat. Eject? Why? If you stay in until the last second you should die with your asset. Eject useless bl...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.05 19:13:00
|
457. Vehicles Deserve Better - in General Discussions [original thread]
Bigger maps would solve a lot of problems with vehicles not having a role. For me the main issue was how small the maps got towards the end, which I'm pretty sure was down to infantry complaining about how vehicles got to the objective before the...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.05 16:23:00
|
458. Vehicles Deserve Better - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vehicles deserve their own game... 10/10 would play RDV simulator on my phone.
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.04 23:47:00
|
459. Moving On - in General Discussions [original thread]
TERRORIST NO 1 wrote: i started playing eve now, idk what im doing Taking Jihad jeeping to the next level? Jihad space shipping! From one jihad to another, may we not have exploded into the side of people, tanks, sometimes dropships that wer...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.07.02 14:27:00
|
460. The real MVP! - in General Discussions [original thread]
DAAAA BEAST wrote: I hope they allow DS3 controller too through apps like Motioninjoy. It can be kind of a annoying for some to be stuck to game with a keyboard that has cheetos bits between the keys while other rich spoiled brats MLG stomp me...
- by Derpty Derp - at 2016.06.30 21:32:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |