| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
281. Why Tanks are not OP ( Av ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALT2 acc wrote: Defy Gravity wrote: ALT2 acc wrote: Samuel Zelik wrote: The right conclusion (to an extent), but the wrong reason. Blasters, dual reps, dual harda are op There not invincible though. Infantry are infantry & Tank...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 16:33:00
|
282. Why Tanks are not OP ( Av ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Henchmen21 wrote: Slow tanks down and or buff prox mines. Problem solved. I've thought about that before. but they should do both in the end..
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 16:31:00
|
283. Why Tanks are not OP ( Av ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ares 514 wrote: Dear OP. **** you. :) Love you to. :D
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 16:30:00
|
284. Why Tanks are not OP ( Av ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Necandi Brasil wrote: Your MLT costs less than my proto swarms fitting and you can - 1 hit kill me - Destroy me with machine gun fire - run over me - Redline Rail kill me If you consider this balance, then I shall consider you stupid! Tank...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 16:29:00
|
285. Why Tanks are not OP ( Av ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
ALT2 acc wrote: Samuel Zelik wrote: The right conclusion (to an extent), but the wrong reason. Blasters, dual reps, dual harda are op There not invincible though. Infantry are infantry & Tanks are Tanks.... superior to infantry obvio...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 16:26:00
|
286. Why Tanks are not OP ( Av ) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Ever since the tank update came out people cry about how OP they are which they are not. If you get one other person to work with you you can kill any tank. It takes TEAMWORK to destroy tanks. If you can get 1 other person or even your whole s...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 15:49:00
|
287. Just In Case Anyone Didn't Know - in General Discussions [original thread]
Auris Lionesse wrote: Does gallente heavy have 6 eyes? Im afraid to look and be disappointed. no it looks bad ass
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 00:08:00
|
288. When We Get the Arena... - in General Discussions [original thread]
ha fame lmao
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.02 00:07:00
|
289. Just In Case Anyone Didn't Know - in General Discussions [original thread]
.
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.01 22:09:00
|
290. Just In Case Anyone Didn't Know - in General Discussions [original thread]
you can find whatthe racial varants of the heavy and scout and vehicals will look like here on this page. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=567021
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.03.01 21:55:00
|
291. let's talk dust:how many of the 'original' corps are left? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sinboto Simmons wrote: Clockin in fo STB! Edit:original= atleast open beta Imperfects but no one gives a **** about them anymore
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.14 05:53:00
|
292. So you want to destroy a Tank? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Lots may look over tanks as "Over Powered" But if you have a squad with friends working together you can dominate AV for the match your in! It may not be an easy task gathering your friends and coordinating them to do what you say but once you've...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.13 00:30:00
|
293. If we went back in TIME - in General Discussions [original thread]
Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Stopped at the mass driver part. First: Mass drivers got their clip buff going into chromosome; the 4 round clip was in codex. Second: Mass drivers were a joke when they had the 4 round clip because their hit detectio...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:58:00
|
294. If we went back in TIME - in General Discussions [original thread]
Tectonic Fusion wrote: I don't know how to explain this but, the game felt more arcade-like in chromosome. It was a lot more fun with the scout suits. But what you failed to mention was damage mods had no stacking penalty and kin cats were OP b...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:51:00
|
295. Rail Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Roy Ventus wrote: Bleh. Rail Rifle is nasty. Combat Rifle is nasty. Scrambler Rifle is nasty. But the AR is decent. I still use the AR but man does it feel like every other weapon outdoes me, even in optimal range and efficiency. Same
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:37:00
|
296. Rail Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
CrotchGrab 360 wrote: Just went 46-3 with ADV rail rifle and scanner Congrats! You get nothing but destroyed when I see you in game!
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:31:00
|
297. If we went back in TIME - in General Discussions [original thread]
Gavr1lo Pr1nc1p wrote: KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Shotgun didn't get any stat changes from Chromosome from what I remember, and hit detection for shotguns was worse. . Actually, in chromosome, the shotgun fire spread was equivalent to w...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:28:00
|
298. If we went back in TIME - in General Discussions [original thread]
Aero Yassavi wrote: Chromosome was good, but it very overrated. It wasn't THAT good. We are in a much better place now. Adapt or die. I know It wasn't THAT good but I miss some of the features from it that made it ddecent
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:21:00
|
299. If we went back in TIME - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Everything seems better in the past, but if you could go back you would find it overrated and much worse than the current state of things. I'm not happy with the current state of the game, but I strongly disagree th...
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:18:00
|
300. If we went back in TIME - in General Discussions [original thread]
Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: The feel is so different now. Yep
- by Defy Gravity - at 2014.01.10 23:10:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |