| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
21. Where's the 1 million SP and ISK? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, if it doesn't arrive today I'm sorry for getting you guys' hopes up. I thought it would be here today since it was monday last week. They may just be waiting for the new build though.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 13:39:00
|
22. Ragnarok Unltd. recruitment topic. - in General Discussions [original thread]
So, seeing as how there's nothing at all on these forums for those of us looking to side with the Caldari for the faction war, I decided to take matters into my own hands. This corp is aimed towards those with a desire to play the faction war ext...
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 05:01:00
|
23. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kengfa wrote: Daedra Lord9 wrote: Alhanna Ridgeway wrote: Apparently everyone thinks that is a tanks job, to just move troops around. You know wanting to make the driver not be in control of the gun and all. So we have APC's already, just...
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:54:00
|
24. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kengfa wrote: Daedra Lord9 wrote: Even HAVs don't have quite the sturdiness I'm thinking of. I figure we need a dedicated transport, slower and less maneuverable than a dropship, but tougher. Slower and less maneuverable wouldn't be good...
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:50:00
|
25. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Alhanna Ridgeway wrote: Apparently everyone thinks that is a tanks job, to just move troops around. You know wanting to make the driver not be in control of the gun and all. So we have APC's already, just got to put the armor back on them. T...
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:47:00
|
26. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Even HAVs don't have quite the sturdiness I'm thinking of. I figure we need a dedicated transport, slower and less maneuverable than a dropship, but tougher.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:42:00
|
27. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Also, with the maps getting bigger, I can see the need to move troops around quickly without too much fear of swarms.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:31:00
|
28. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, I see them more as corporate tools. No practical use outside of coordinated teams.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:28:00
|
29. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I dunno, I just feel like arming it would take away the role of LAVs, and if it were armed, then you wouldn't really be able to armor it enough to serve as a breakthrough.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:21:00
|
30. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, APCs are typically armed, at least in some way, which is why I didn't call it that. I just feel like a relatively cheap, very sturdy vehicle that can be fitted with various modules to support infantry, withstand sustained fire, or spawn infa...
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:15:00
|
31. Business Interaction between DUST and EVE? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well, if EvE players can make Dust gear, which they would never use, so what makes Dusters any different. I'd gladly build some ships with the sole intent of selling them.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:11:00
|
32. Anyone else feel like we need a ground transport? - in General Discussions [original thread]
Something heavily armored, but completely unarmed. Something of a breakthrough vehicle. I don't mean something like the LAVs that we have now, more like a land version of the dropship, but, well, what I said before. Thoughts?
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 02:01:00
|
33. Trailer to game - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sleepy Zan wrote: and one day we will With CCP, this is probably true. They'll keep building until we have everything we've dreamed of and more.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 01:31:00
|
34. Thowing grenades INTO tanks - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maybe damage, but I wouldn't say destroy.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 01:29:00
|
35. Preferred turret? - in General Discussions [original thread]
I tend to give gunners cycled, due to the fact that at least a couple have to hit, regardless of skill.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.17 00:16:00
|
36. Not op my *** - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
I agree on both points, but to make the tactical require charging, it should have a tad bit more damage per shot.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.16 23:38:00
|
37. C27-N Specialist Sniper Rifle - in General Discussions [original thread]
Unique salvage. There're several different weapons like it, most of which are quite good.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.16 23:29:00
|
38. To the people who spawn in a Dropship, From a Dropship Pilot - in General Discussions [original thread]
I too wish that those who spawn in my dropship would get out over objectives. That said, I wish there were more people that actually spawn in it. I'm sick of flying around objectives only to have one person spawn in, then decide they want to just ...
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.16 23:19:00
|
39. the i win button - in General Discussions [original thread]
It's an insanely situational weapon though, unlike the tank. AV grenades ONLY work on vehicles. Tanks work against everything.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.16 21:50:00
|
40. I broke the 50 Like Mark! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Xavier Hastings wrote: I feel so loved. Not that it matters. I like this.
- by Daedra Lord9 - at 2012.09.16 20:15:00
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |