| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
8721. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Cosgar wrote: 1.7 hits, Ion Pistol, Magsec SMG, Rail Rifle, and some kind of plasma grenade comes out. Which suit is better then? Logi? They said nothing about an Ion Pistol, magsec SMG or a plasma grenade....
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:19:00
|
8722. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: Long time, no meow. +1 Meow :)
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:18:00
|
8723. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Well put. +1 Also holy $/## you're back! Silly human, SoTa has been trolling since before you were born, no way that y...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:17:00
|
8724. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Mr Machine Guns wrote: logo should do less damage and can't use damage mods, they should do 5 to 10 percent less damage or you have to do something to assault there is no advantage for assault over logis, people are going to say sidearms but wh...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:12:00
|
8725. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cosgar wrote: 1.7 hits, Ion Pistol, Magsec SMG, Rail Rifle, and some kind of plasma grenade comes out. Which suit is better then? Logi? They said nothing about an Ion Pistol, magsec SMG or a plasma grenade. What we know for sure is the combat...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:07:00
|
8726. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Well put. +1 Also holy $/## you're back! Silly human, SoTa has been trolling since before you were born, no way that you were waiting for the Rail Rifle since then :P...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:06:00
|
8727. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: Cat Merc wrote: gbghg wrote: *notices cat merc* here kitty kitty, c'mere kitty, you know you want a cuddle. murr? :3 *rubs cat merc's belly* now kitty, i have a job for you, chase the red laser! *pulls out a laser pointer...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:04:00
|
8728. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Justin Tymes wrote: Assaults don't need a second EQ slot, Scouts should have that way more than Assaults. Heavy = 0 Assault = 1 Scout = 2 Logi = 3/4 That should be the EQ slot formula. I approve of that actually.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 21:03:00
|
8729. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Luk Manag wrote: A better solution would be to give the assault class 2 equipment slots and put the nerf hammer back in the closet. In case you didn't notice, I gave a non nerf suggestion of just buffing the CPU/PG of all suits except the logi.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:56:00
|
8730. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Cat Merc wrote: Spectral Clone wrote: Thread approved. +1 You do not approve the cat, the cat approves you. Silly human. In america cat approves you, in soviet Sweden approve cats you. In short, cats appro...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:50:00
|
8731. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Soldner VonKuechle wrote: Well put. +1 Also holy $/## you're back! Silly human, SoTa has been trolling since before you were born, no way that you were waiting for the Rail Rifle since then :P
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:46:00
|
8732. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
Spectral Clone wrote: Thread approved. +1 You do not approve the cat, the cat approves you. Silly human.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:42:00
|
8733. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: I am eating a Tuna and mayonnaise sandwich right now..... :3 lol, same thing.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:42:00
|
8734. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: *notices cat merc* here kitty kitty, c'mere kitty, you know you want a cuddle. murr? :3
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:40:00
|
8735. Why proto logis are a problem - in General Discussions [original thread]
What most people fail to realize that when people say "logi is OP", they don't mean that logi is simply a better fighter. It's that they're pretty much the same as the assault (with a few swaps, like less speed but more eHP) BUT get 3-4 equipment ...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:37:00
|
8736. Be careful what you wish for. (Pro logi thread) - in General Discussions [original thread]
Like they're doing it right now? I get revived by f'ing assault suits more often than I do by logis. Reps? Only from rep nanohives that they're standing on to get 394032942 kills. Ammo? Any assault that knows what's good for him carries a nanohi...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:12:00
|
8737. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Make the thread about the active scanner being a multiplier of scan precision so I can like and support it. Done: https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1470208#post1470208
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 20:06:00
|
8738. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: True Adamance wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Oh god it's you. I swear to God you are the same person! Huehuehue. Arkena plus Cats= CATPOCALYPSE. I have seen these horrors before, w...
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 19:54:00
|
8739. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
True Adamance wrote: Arkena Wyrnspire wrote: Oh god it's you. I swear to God you are the same person! Nah, he's just my agent. If you read this your memory is now wiped and you don't know what I just said.
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 19:45:00
|
8740. Humans - in General Discussions [original thread]
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Make the thread about the active scanner being a multiplier of scan precision so I can like and support it. rgr
- by Cat Merc - at 2013.11.06 19:44:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |