| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
1341. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: So: Corp A holds a district Corp B attacks it Corp B is "invading" the district and depleting Corp A's loyalty Corp A has to kick them out How does Corp A do that? How do we schedule a match between th...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 17:55:00
|
1342. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: /me just wants to have a discussion about random stuff :'( "Perhaps you think you're being treated unfairly? Good. You know it would be unfortunate if I had to leave a garrison here." Mmmm Star ...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 17:51:00
|
1343. IGN Live Stream - in General Discussions [original thread]
Zacaria Zen wrote: what time is the live stream then? http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/02/25/ign-live-presents-dust-514 12 -> 13 Pacific. Should make it 20 -> 21 GMT (or EVE time)
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 17:49:00
|
1344. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Free Beers wrote: Dust can't be turned in to a 23/7 job. Free Beers wrote: because the timer Idea would be horrible in dust Care to expand upon this? The purpose of timers in EVE is to eliminat...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 17:38:00
|
1345. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Laurent Cazaderon wrote: Beers, where do you see anything related to a SI-IMP grudge ? oO If the guy disagrees, like i do, and he's SI doesnt mean its because you're an IMP. I get the tone is a bit rough, but what you're s...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 16:47:00
|
1346. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Free Beers wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: The really nice thing about our design is that (hopefully) it will let small corps hold a small part of space and big corps can own a big part and better cor...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 16:45:00
|
1347. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Cyn Bruin wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Free Beers wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: The really nice thing about our design is that (hopefully) it will let small corps hold a small part of space and big corps can own a big part and better corp...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 16:37:00
|
1348. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: Dust can't be turned in to a 23/7 job. Free Beers wrote: because the timer Idea would be horrible in dust Care to expand upon this? The purpose of timers in EVE is to eliminate having to be on 23/7 and know that if you...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 16:31:00
|
1349. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Laurent Cazaderon wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: D Roc43 wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: I'm also seeing possible scenarios where teams may post contracts for cheap to see if weak teams will take the bait to attack their own districts in hope tha...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 16:04:00
|
1350. A nice break from DUST 514 QQ - in General Discussions [original thread]
:D /tear Makes us all real happy to hear things like this. So glad you guys are enjoy the game and cannot wait to see what you think of our upcoming plans. p.s. yes, I will use ever opportunity I can get to tease you. :P
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 15:58:00
|
1351. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
D Roc43 wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: I'm also seeing possible scenarios where teams may post contracts for cheap to see if weak teams will take the bait to attack their own districts in hope that they make money on the salvage. There are goi...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 15:26:00
|
1352. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Beren Hurin wrote: I'm also seeing possible scenarios where teams may post contracts for cheap to see if weak teams will take the bait to attack their own districts in hope that they make money on the salvage. I see nothing wrong with this,
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 15:25:00
|
1353. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Omniscient wrote: I HATE it when DEV's talk like this. I can never tell if they are suggesting things that should be possible soon, or if they are thinking long run. DON'T TOY WITH MY HEART! How about honest question?
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 13:11:00
|
1354. VIDEO - TEAM TANK TROLL - Gratuitous Tank SPAM - in General Discussions [original thread]
That was a great video and awesome commentary. Thank you very much for sharing! :D
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 13:10:00
|
1355. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaeralli Sturmovos wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: gbghg wrote: But i can see large corps like PRO mounting wave attacks if they have to. So if you successfully defend a district they can instantly field a new team and basically repeat the proc...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 12:50:00
|
1356. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Jeremiad R Doomprofit wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: ... O_O I may have talked to much... Back to work for me. Oow, I love it when y'all talk too much. Speaking of talking... This topic of pl...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 11:59:00
|
1357. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vaerana Myshtana wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: You bring up something that has been really hard for us to figure out. There are so many factors that go into it and finding other examples to base ideas off is really hard because almost no one ha...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 11:50:00
|
1358. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HowDidThatTaste wrote: As I understand it they don't want to make it zerg and alienate the smaller corps. But I still don't understand how it will work, if larger corps do just attack over and over, I don't see that...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 11:42:00
|
1359. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: I see no reason why attrition shouldn't be a viable tactic. It's just important to make sure it's not the ONLY viable tactic. /agree Attrition should be an option to larger organizations. Someone who owns one district shoul...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:56:00
|
1360. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
SILENTSAM 69 wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: In terms of priority I would rather see the ability to contract other corporations to take a district for you. That would also mean contracting other corporations to help you defend your district as wel...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:51:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |