| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
921. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Kaeralli Sturmovos wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: gbghg wrote: But i can see large corps like PRO mounting wave attacks if they have to. So if you successfully defend a district they can instantly field a new team and basically repeat the proc...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 12:50:00
|
922. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Maken Tosch wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: Jeremiad R Doomprofit wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: ... O_O I may have talked to much... Back to work for me. Oow, I love it when y'all talk too much. Speaking of talking... This topic of pl...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 11:59:00
|
923. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vaerana Myshtana wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: You bring up something that has been really hard for us to figure out. There are so many factors that go into it and finding other examples to base ideas off is really hard because almost no one ha...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 11:50:00
|
924. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: HowDidThatTaste wrote: As I understand it they don't want to make it zerg and alienate the smaller corps. But I still don't understand how it will work, if larger corps do just attack over and over, I don't see that...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 11:42:00
|
925. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Baal Roo wrote: I see no reason why attrition shouldn't be a viable tactic. It's just important to make sure it's not the ONLY viable tactic. /agree Attrition should be an option to larger organizations. Someone who owns one district shoul...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:56:00
|
926. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
SILENTSAM 69 wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: In terms of priority I would rather see the ability to contract other corporations to take a district for you. That would also mean contracting other corporations to help you defend your district as wel...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:51:00
|
927. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
gbghg wrote: But i can see large corps like PRO mounting wave attacks if they have to. So if you successfully defend a district they can instantly field a new team and basically repeat the process until they finally take control. part of me wor...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:47:00
|
928. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Vance Alken wrote: gbghg wrote: Morathi III wrote: Telcontar Dunedain wrote: gbghg wrote: Its a difficult system to balance because if you go too far one way you will see small corps with most if not all of their members getting int...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:34:00
|
929. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP Nullarbor wrote: The really nice thing about our design is that (hopefully) it will let small corps hold a small part of space and big corps can own a big part and better corps will own more for their size. This is i...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:32:00
|
930. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Well you guys sure made a few posts over the night. I shall read through the last few pages and see if there are things to respond to. :) p.s. /facepalm at thread title change >.<
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 10:30:00
|
931. Extended down time.... - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sorry guys, todays update was mostly EVE stuff and as Odiain Suliis pointed out a few backend updates for DUST. If anything hopefully you notice some battle server improvements, but other then that there shouldn't be any noticeable change. :(
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.27 09:56:00
|
932. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Telcontar Dunedain wrote: gbghg wrote: Telcontar Dunedain wrote: gbghg wrote: Telcontar Dunedain wrote: One thing - Talking about districts is a failure. It's either you own the whole planet or its nothing. Having to fight 14 sim...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 23:00:00
|
933. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Telcontar Dunedain wrote: gbghg wrote: Telcontar Dunedain wrote: One thing - Talking about districts is a failure. It's either you own the whole planet or its nothing. Having to fight 14 simultaneous districts at a time to take or hold...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 22:49:00
|
934. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Iron Wolf Saber wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: General Tiberius1 wrote: a way to counter the above is to make defending pay more. the more you own the more you make. the attackers don't make much initially, but if they manage to take control ...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 22:47:00
|
935. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Telcontar Dunedain wrote: One thing - Talking about districts is a failure. It's either you own the whole planet or its nothing. Having to fight 14 simultaneous districts at a time to take or hold a planet would be complete crap. In other w...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 22:46:00
|
936. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
General Tiberius1 wrote: a way to counter the above is to make defending pay more. the more you own the more you make. the attackers don't make much initially, but if they manage to take control of the area, once they start getting attacked, t...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 22:38:00
|
937. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: PLEASE LET US TRANSFER DISTRICTS TOO!!!! I would love to be able to buy/sell districts but there needs to be a actual build in contract tranfers and there needs to be roles/8 hour window for it Not sure I would put much eff...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 22:34:00
|
938. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
Free Beers wrote: CCP FoxFour wrote: 0 Try Harder wrote: Right now there's almost never an ISK incentive to do a corp battle. I like them, but I still have to get all of my isk from pub stomping. Giving me isk from pve isn't going to mak...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 21:47:00
|
939. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
I DOUBLE POSTED! :D I feel initiated now.
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 21:32:00
|
940. FW Economic Model Concerns -CCP Nothin- - in General Discussions [original thread]
0 Try Harder wrote: Right now there's almost never an ISK incentive to do a corp battle. I like them, but I still have to get all of my isk from pub stomping. Giving me isk from pve isn't going to make me feel better either, as I want to have ...
- by CCP FoxFour - at 2013.02.26 21:25:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |