Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
241. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: So you are one of the forum trolls? Why are you here kid? Pointing out the irony of your statement is hardly trolling.
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.18 11:01:00
|
242. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sir Petersen wrote: Gaelon Thrace wrote: I think simply opening up the market for DUST mercs to trade with each other as well as with EVE pilots would help immensely . The market will be a HUGE update for the game among other things.. Bu...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.18 10:40:00
|
243. PlayStation Vita - in General Discussions [original thread]
Eurydice Itzhak wrote: Shadow heat wrote: So, i just got a right new PS3 to play exclusively Dust 514, and now i have to buy a Vita for the "Neocom mobile application" ? Why can't you release a normal Android App ? I getting tired of giving ...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.18 08:55:00
|
244. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Dustin Peril wrote: Another dust is doomed thread, dont you get it you cant kill dust, it keeps getting better If it keeps getting better, why is the long term trend in playercount heading down?
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.18 08:21:00
|
245. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
RoundEy3 wrote: The whole player count concern is like worrying about a stock market shift of a few pennies. Day by day obsession of them will make you suicidal. In the big picture it all becomes clear and calm. This would be true if we were...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 15:42:00
|
246. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Sgt Buttscratch wrote: You should have played Brink, 8v8, near te end there, you'd have 6 bots in the match easily, and the human players you could gues who they would be. This game is far from in trouble, but lil nuggets like the OP and the ha...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 15:40:00
|
247. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Rynoceros wrote: A more significant connection EvE isn't the key to player retention. It's all in the gameplay. While I'm certainly not downplaying the importance of good gameplay, I am using the experience of EVE in postulating that more ...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 13:38:00
|
248. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Smiley McCloud wrote: I also believe that many of these anti-dust/negative forum posts are being posted by the compitition. Anyone who believes otherwise, I have a bridge to sell you. If you believe that the competition need to create accoun...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 13:05:00
|
249. Very worrying signs for Dust's future - in General Discussions [original thread]
Allah's Snackbar wrote: I see the AUR division is still pumping out stuff though. Even creating extended down times to add items to the store. What kind of system is that? One can never have too many of the same thing with a different name...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 12:40:00
|
250. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Wolfica wrote: well if LAV's are faster then missles. top speed 106mph base. they missiles are going way to slow I'm not a vehicle driver. I'm usually the one with the swarm launcher. But even I think those poor bastards deserve a break, and...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:39:00
|
251. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Wolfica wrote: ok. still think missiles should be faster though. I felt a great disturbance in the Forums, as if millions of HAV drivers and dropship pilots suddenly cried out in terror and were never silenced.
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:31:00
|
252. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: I like to spend my lunchtimes slapping down little whiny cod boy mercs like you , that do nothing but call for unreasonable nerfs that eventually ruin the game. It's a good thing you have a phone to do this! Otherwise y...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:27:00
|
253. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Wolfica wrote: well its 4:17 AM here... why hate on Cheetos? ehh I got lost after the first comment. what would the objective that the jets try to hold look like/be? just don't think they should be limited by Air to Air combat only Cer...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:24:00
|
254. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Tectonious Falcon wrote: Did these guys even read the OP? Lol did you? Or are you the ops alt trying to regain so.e cred You've run out of credit for your 'phone', you say?
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:21:00
|
255. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Aran Abbas wrote: pegasis prime wrote: Aran Abbas wrote: pegasis prime wrote: As a hav driver I welcome one of tge provided counters to jets that has been mentiond anti air havs . The op is worried that hell hav...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:17:00
|
256. Gallente Week AUR items from 18th until 25th! - in General Discussions [original thread]
Chibi Andy wrote: lol whats the point of having camo when there isnt anything to blend in with? we stand out pretty much as it is, no amount of camo will hide us They're going to camo up the inside of the MCC so no-one can see our shame.
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:13:00
|
257. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: Aran Abbas wrote: pegasis prime wrote: As a hav driver I welcome one of tge provided counters to jets that has been mentiond anti air havs . The op is worried that hell have to watch up as well as I front of him. And ...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:12:00
|
258. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Wolfica wrote: 1) instead of nurfing jets so they are only Air to Air capable why not boost missile speed, that would solve two problems. since missiles need a speed boost. 2) jets are faster then LAV's to answer your question. 3) All inform...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:11:00
|
259. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
pegasis prime wrote: As a hav driver I welcome one of tge provided counters to jets that has been mentiond anti air havs . The op is worried that hell have to watch up as well as I front of him. And I ask the op what balance deatg from above on...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:03:00
|
260. Jets should have nothing to do with the ground, directly - in Feedback/Requests [original thread]
Zyrus Amalomyn wrote: Aran Abbas wrote: Wolfica wrote: +1 pegasis prime. maybe look into the lore and then come back with a reasonable comment. The lore would have it that a capital ship can glass an entire map. Roleplay nergasms are s...
- by Aran Abbas - at 2013.06.17 11:00:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |