Not sure how your coming up with your numbers mate. Some of us have done a much better job at this. I have something in the works, that will hopefully be online soon.

Maybe you should leave the numbers to the pros ;)

war points are just a measure of how much you do... you're basically comparing kills to hacks/repairs/assists . not a valid measure of skill imo. also kills give warpoints themselves (50 in most cases)

Well first I have to make sure posting the calculator on the net won't break the NDA, then I will provide a link and you can see for yourself.

Your formula directly penalizes support actions and is not a good measure of Kills/Time. The people who score highest on your list are people who are doing nothing except killing - no assists, no destroyed vehicles, no hacks. I won't say that makes them bad players, but I am not sure that makes them the best.

Well for one, we look at more than just kills, we take into account the type of game dust is, and well we know how to do math.

three stats can become nine, it's all in knowing how to use them.

which means all your doing is killing, not hacking, capping, or helping your team in anyway. this game isn't about just killing things, if that's all it was, nukes are the answer.

You sir, have no imagination, and that's why your numbers are useless.

Because you also earn 50 WP per kill. So K divided by WP is Kills/(50*Kills+Support WP). As support WP approaches 0, your "score" approaches 1, the max value on your system.

Being the best on your scale means you are proportionally least likely to do ANY support actions. You proved it yourself.

Nobody wants to sit in that long ass walmart line doe

I have to agree with Noc, Willful Stupidity can not be cured, sorry.

fine you want a stat, .59

that is you sir, the second lowest score out of over 100 entries I have in my spread sheet. I'm done here, enjoy your tiny little world.

Why do you need him on your team? Is it because against disorganized, average-skill players you only have a 4.72 KDR?

diggehh a homie doe

Is that all you poor people care about? Bread and circuses?

If you divided kills by war points then the smaller the number is the more war points the player earns per kill. So 10 kills and 10 war points gives a 1.0 ratio and 10 kills to 10000 war points gives a 0.001 ratio. So by YOUR numbers listed you are the worst on that list (no offense) giving me the best ratio for NON-tank drivers.

Sorry if someone else pointed this out, I didn't read most of the posts.

Now about this PDIGGY show your math and explain where you numbers came from in detail and maybe people will actually care. Until then you are just a troll with an ego. Since the leaderboards aren't on the forums you we can't see your numbers without getting into game. Post them and show your work.

I just killed you 3 times in-game the other day within 5 minutes. I don't know where you're getting your "facts."

Divide 1 by 50 to get WP per kill. That gives 0.20, assuming no bonuses from squad commands.

So, the closer to 0.2, the more kills you get compared to any other type of gameplay e.g. hacking, uplinks, etc.

We can safely assume that 75% of your game is killing.

Take your kills and multiply by 50.

Kills * 50 = Base War Points earned by kills

That's the base amount of War Points earned for kills. I'll shorten this to KWP.

Take the Total War Points (shortened to WP) and divide by the KWP:

WP / KWP

This will give you a number above (or in special cases exactly equal to) one.

In the result, "1" is an understood representation of war points earned through kills. So to get a value that is a reflection of war points outside of kills, subtract one from this number to get an adjusted war point value for actions outside of kills (shortened to Action War Points or AWP).

(WP / KWP) - 1 = AWP

The closer this number is to 0 (zero) the more heavily the individual relies on kills to earn war points.

As the number approaches 1 it suggests the individual earns almost equally the same amount of war points outside of kills as they do for kills. (If it's exactly 1 they earn an equal amount of war points for other actions as they do for kills)

Any number above 1 means they earn more war points for other actions than they do for kills. (More than 50% of their war points are other actions)


So in terms of placing things in perspective:


1. Omnipotens Zitro: (988,718 / 649,350) - 1 = .523

2. STB-sticarlos989 EV: (1,005,601 / 539,600) - 1 = .864

3. Alex-ZX: (597,621 / 452,850) - 1 = .320

4. xprotoman23: (566,878 / 442,650) - 1 = .281

5. Jim Bill 420Warrior: (1,152,277 / 417,400) -1 = 1.761

6. xspn187x: (593,740 / 412,600) -1 = .439

7. Sha Kharn Clone: (639,302 / 393,150) -1 = .626

8. YoUnGcUz: (680,968 / 387,200) -1 = .759

9. Ruthra25: (778,617 / 380,350) -1 = 1.047

10. Noc Tempre: (901,463 / 359,550) -1 = 1.507

31. PDIGGY22: (348,304 / 276,400) - 1 = .260

Myself (For my own humility): (224,791 / 101,500) - 1 = 1.215

Wow you missed the point. You are the one trying to prove you math is right pretend this is school and show your damn work or stfu. Otherwise you prove nothing as the rest of us have no basis to check your work. I just want to see you show your stats and then the order of operations you used to get your numbers.

You are the one intent on stroking your epeen just show us what numbers you used. Don't tell me show me. I have kids I can't just turn the game whenever I want to look up your stats. Just humor me unless of course you are afraid that you made a mistake in your math.

Edit
BTW I am not dumb my IQ is probably 25 points higher than yours just based on the average compared to mine.

I pay little mind to the hoi polloi when they lash out against their betters.
They can't help being the way they are what with their substandard upbringing and low financial standing.

Its okay someone posted the numbers for you now I just want to know did you divide kills by war points or war points by kill?

No sorry bro, your math is right but your interpretation of the data is wrong. When dividing a small number (kills) by a large number (war points) it approaches zero. The closer the number gets to zero the larger the war points value was, conversely this also works for a lower kill total.

That is why tank drivers have a better ratio because they get kills and assist but also vehicle kills and assist for just being in the tank.

Sorry pdiggy you are wrong others have pointed this out you pulled out these numbers and you're the worst on the list. I'm not trying to be a **** but I'm pointing out fact.

ReGnUm DEl arena battles will be the true test. I use a prototype swarm launcher, prototype SMG, and repairing nano hives to help my team, I don't just play for kills I play for the win. So I consider this beef done until the Great Gladiator Arena Expansion of 2013.

No doubt in my mind that PDIGGY is a killer, a good FPS player, not just with kills, but he does do objectives. He has great gun game, much like Proto, and these guys do it in an assualt suit, not some glitchy recon suit or OP tank.
BUT, as for your logic and numbers.....

I can get 20 kills in a game which should equal 1000 WP, however, many times i am squad leader and I ensure objectives being marked so I can get 2500 WP, 125 wp per kill and 250 per objective taken. The point is, there are far too many variables to use WP as a basis of time spent within the game esp when we do not know how it is used to modify SP gained. If you wanted an ego boost just jump into a game and rack up some kills, and if that doesn't do it for you anymore, PDIGGY, you are a swell player, but an ass :)

Eh PDIGGY is a putz who barely knows how to write a sentence let alone make it coherent.

Edit
I hate my smart phone sometimes.

k.

Because you don't specify that YOUR opinion is that having a majority of your WP be from kills makes you a more skilled player. Most players feel that getting WP from other aspects helps the team out more so than just kills. I feel that a person who gets kills, assists, hacks, and destroys vehicles is better than someone who only gets points from kills, assists, and hacks. So Therefore STB-stlcarlos989 EV >> PDIGGY22.

BTW in math terms ">>" means significantly greater than.

Compare our Kill to WP ratios. As of 11:30pm CST.

PDIGGY22: 5,547 kills and 349,454 War Points
STB-stlcarlos989 EV: 11,075 kills and 1,030,784

For every kill PDIGGY22 averages 62.9987 War Points
For every kill STB-stlcarlos989 EV averages 93.0730 War Points

Point proven.

Yeah so your point is? Also you and I both know who wins our 1v1s.

You're a great player and I'd love to have you in my corp but the point you're arguing doesn't make sense.

Oh and in your example player B is the better player.

Your math is equally flawed. By your math, and the deductions you make from it, bigger number=better yes? Scenario:

Player A: 20 kills 1000WP
Player B: 20 Kills 1500WP

Player A only killed other players. He hacked no objectives, killed no vehicles, nothing but killing. Player B hacked 5 objectives in addition to his killing. Using your math player A scores a .02 while player B scores a .013333, which by your math and logic makes player A the better player when he clearly was not.

PDIGGY22 you tell yourself what you need to but the top guns who have faced us know who they would rather see on the other team.

Also I average 25+ kills a game and I've never seen you out kill me in a game, and I use a prototype SL and SMG so I sacrifice killing potential to destroy vehicles in order to help my team more so than just getting kills and hacks.

Turn your brain around and circle back, i do believe you missed the point. Or you didn't and now you're just trolling.

Fact: Your math proves the same amount of nothing as you think everyone elses does

Fact: That means you have a higher percentage of war points from kills than all other actions which earn War Points.

Fact: That means you do more killing than anyone else for the amount of non-killing you do.

Fact: That still has NO bearing on how valuable you are to your team.

Conclusion: Rethink your math, and "learn to read" isn't a fact.

Fact: That still doesn't actually mean anything

Here's your mistake.

Kills per war points isn't relevant to what you're claiming it means unless you can confirm how many War Points you earn per match.