Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Alena Ventrallis
Vengeance Unbound
2255
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 09:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Please increase the amount carried to about 6-8. Bandwidth and hard caps means spamming them is next to impossible, and it would really help logis move around the battlefield and set up shop without having to run to a supply depot every minute or so.
Do not go gentle into that good night;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
|
Sinboto Simmons
Murphys-Law General Tso's Alliance
6713
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 12:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
which equipment, what tier, why is smamming them needed?
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 5 Prof 1
Born of the Brutor tribe
|
SirManBoy
Molon Labe. General Tso's Alliance
707
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 15:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:which equipment, what tier, why is smamming them needed?
Because of the bandwidth system, higher equipment carried numbers aren't really a spam threat. Bandwidth caps the number of active pieces of equipment you can have on the field at any one time and carrying more doesn't change that. With a higher carried figure, players are simply much more likely to pop their own equipment. However, it does give support players greater longevity in their suits, which prevents them from having to make such frequent trips to the supply depot. |
John Demonsbane
Unorganized Ninja Infantry Tactics
4922
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 16:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
I approve this message.
(The godfather of tactical logistics)
|
Dubya Guy
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
88
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 16:47:00 -
[5] - Quote
Needs to happen.
FPS = First Person Support. Kills win battles but it's kinda hard to kill if you're dead and out of ammo.
|
Alena Ventrallis
Vengeance Unbound
2258
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 17:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:which equipment, what tier, why is smamming them needed?
All equipment.
All tiers.
Did you not read the part where you can't spam them with this change?
Do not go gentle into that good night;
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
|
shaman oga
Dead Man's Game
3415
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 17:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Wait i've posted the same without looking at other threads, going to delete mine.
Situational awareness also known as passive scan.
|
Kallas Hallytyr
Skullbreakers
1100
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 17:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
[Edit: Oh, I should mention that I support this ]
One thing that I think would be a good addendum to the Bandwidth system is to prioritise same equipment type for deletion. Example:
Logi player has a ton of links and hives as support for their squad. First drop is a link for quick spawns Second, third and fourth (now at max BW for simple example) are all hives as the battle moves. Fifth equipment goes down (let's say it's still a hives as the squad is still fighting at the point but the line as moved a little) but since #1 is the link, that link pops first.
While more carried would definitely help, since you could much more easily replace the popped link, but if equipment destroyed like-for-like then you'd have a better idea of what you're destroying rather than having to remember everything you've dropped before and if something has been used up or not. Might not be necessary or possible, just some food for thought.
Alt of Halla Murr. Sentinel.
|
Sinboto Simmons
Murphys-Law General Tso's Alliance
6720
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 20:53:00 -
[9] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Sinboto Simmons wrote:which equipment, what tier, why is smamming them needed?
All equipment. All tiers. Did you not read the part where you can't spam them with this change? I was confused due to the short OP and was trying to get a longer explanation like the cpm gave.
Sinboto - The True Blood Minja
Forum Warrior level 5 Prof 1
Born of the Brutor tribe
|
Mister Goo
Abandoned Privilege Top Men.
101
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 21:50:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kallas Hallytyr wrote:[Edit: Oh, I should mention that I support this ] One thing that I think would be a good addendum to the Bandwidth system is to prioritise same equipment type for deletion. Example: Logi player has a ton of links and hives as support for their squad. First drop is a link for quick spawns Second, third and fourth (now at max BW for simple example) are all hives as the battle moves. Fifth equipment goes down (let's say it's still a hives as the squad is still fighting at the point but the line as moved a little) but since #1 is the link, that link pops first. While more carried would definitely help, since you could much more easily replace the popped link, but if equipment destroyed like-for-like then you'd have a better idea of what you're destroying rather than having to remember everything you've dropped before and if something has been used up or not. Might not be necessary or possible, just some food for thought.
I like this idea very much, so easy to keep track of links, hives, or RE's
Closed Beta Vet
Minmatar Logistics I Repair, Revive, and Replenish. Leave the slaying for Assaults and Heavies.
|
|
Jaysyn Larrisen
OSG Planetary Operations Covert Intervention
1381
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 23:18:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alena Ventrallis wrote:Please increase the amount carried to about 6-8. Bandwidth and hard caps means spamming them is next to impossible, and it would really help logis move around the battlefield and set up shop without having to run to a supply depot every minute or so.
Spamming is not quite the word you are looking for. Basically with the current BW and depending on your set up you will need to resupply often, thus taking you out of the fight or extended periods.
"Endless money forms the sinews of War." - Cicero
Skype: jaysyn.larrisen
Twitter: @JaysynLarrisen
|
Vicious Minotaur
1461
|
Posted - 2014.12.12 23:27:00 -
[12] - Quote
Needs to happen yesterday.
Rattati: For every day that goes by and this is not done, I will kick Joey's Rattata.
I am a minotaur.
a+üa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa+üa¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça¦ça+üa+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+¦a+üa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa+üa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ëa¦ë
|
RedBleach LeSanglant
Hellstorm Inc General Tso's Alliance
708
|
Posted - 2014.12.13 00:00:00 -
[13] - Quote
The proposed equipment changes in the CPM: Logi Feedback request speak directly to this point. I would recommend it.
Look at the Google Doc and I believe it is the last tab that talks about the increase in actual equipment carried but divides the overall nanos, spawns, etc among the increased number.
You don't have to agree with all of it, but since this is already on the CPM's table I would suggest it as a resource.
The Logi Code. Creator, Believer, Follower
Trust CROSS
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |