DUST Search - [Request]WP for equipment destruction

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[Request]WP for equipment destruction

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Phelix Mark Renegades for Life 0	Posted - 2013.07.29 03:38:00 - [1] - Quote I would be great if we could receive a reward for destroying enemy equipment. Maybe 2 WP per?
Meeko Fent Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State 407	Posted - 2013.07.29 04:22:00 - [2] - Quote 10 WP. There. Go flux some uplinks.
ALPHA DECRIPTER M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 176	Posted - 2013.07.29 07:55:00 - [3] - Quote Phelix Mark wrote: I would be great if we could receive a reward for destroying enemy equipment. Maybe 2 WP per? Seems like a no brainer... DO IT! `Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST .
Fenrir XIII Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 4	Posted - 2013.07.29 09:06:00 - [4] - Quote hmmmmmm +15. no lower than 10.
DS 10 G I A N T EoN. 629	Posted - 2013.07.29 13:12:00 - [5] - Quote 15 for Uplinks, 10 for all others. Only reason I say more for Uplinks is because Uplinks are the most important.
Sleepy Shadow L.O.T.I.S. RISE of LEGION 44	Posted - 2013.07.29 13:41:00 - [6] - Quote DS 10 wrote: 15 for Uplinks, 10 for all others. Only reason I say more for Uplinks is because Uplinks are the most important. I say 25-50 for uplinks, because they are that important. Maybe that would stop people spamming them as much as well, seeing as how you would be just giving points to the enemy team. I would love hunting enemy equipment on my scout alt. I do that anyway, but points for doing it would be great! 10 is fitting for hives, I think.
Dirks Macker Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 42	Posted - 2013.07.29 13:50:00 - [7] - Quote I would go with no more than 5 WP. Any higher and people would exploit.
Phelix Mark Renegades for Life 0	Posted - 2013.07.29 22:34:00 - [8] - Quote Dirks Macker wrote: I would go with no more than 5 WP. Any higher and people would exploit. Exactly! That's why I suggested 2 per. Obviously there would most likely be an excessive amount of equipment when i a fire fight so anymore than 5 is ridiculous.
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis Covert Intervention 1337	Posted - 2013.07.29 22:48:00 - [9] - Quote +2-5 per destruction but also allow deployed equipment to be hacked by the opposing team provided they have a codebreaker of equal or higher type equipped (Prototype codebreakers would enable a Merc to hack all types of deployed equipment). 0.02 ISK Cross ps ~ fix uplinks being seeing everywhere and patch the ability for uplinks to be glitched into solid objects.
Phelix Mark Renegades for Life 2	Posted - 2013.07.29 22:56:00 - [10] - Quote Nah. I think destroying them would prove more practical. It's like Meeko Fent said, Meeko Fent wrote: Go flux some uplinks.

Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis Covert Intervention 1337	Posted - 2013.07.29 23:02:00 - [11] - Quote Phelix Mark wrote: Nah. I think destroying them would prove more practical. It's like Meeko Fent said, Meeko Fent wrote: Go flux some uplinks. Providing both options allows for tactical flexibility as well as greater diversity in role specialization, providing more uses for hacking skills/mods. Allowing for both methods also puts heavy weight on tactical decision making regarding when and how to deploy equipment as it could become a part of the opposing sides defense/attack if hacked, or feed them WP if destroyed. Either aspect alone adds a bit more to game play but both combined enhances depth beyond what either method achieves singly. Cheers, Cross ps ~ been fluxing uplinks since closed beta, it's a good option by why settle for one option when you could have two?
Thurak1 Psygod9 RISE of LEGION 18	Posted - 2013.07.30 05:37:00 - [12] - Quote i really like both idea's on getting WP for destroying them and being able to hack them (and of course a couple wp for hacking)
Phelix Mark Renegades for Life 3	Posted - 2013.07.30 16:17:00 - [13] - Quote Cross AtupÇì Providing both options allows for tactical flexibility as well as greater diversity in role specialization, providing more uses for hacking skills/mods. Allowing for both methods also puts heavy weight on tactical decision making regarding when and how to deploy equipment as it could become a part of the opposing sides defense/attack if hacked, or feed them WP if destroyed. Either aspect alone adds a bit more to game play but both combined enhances depth beyond what either method achieves singly. Cheers, Cross ps ~ been fluxing uplinks since closed beta, it's a good option by why settle for one option when you could have two? [:pirate: wrote: True having both would prove to be s great help to logistics. How ever, you might want to consider the likelihood of it actually being implemented in the game. Sure have a large amount of WP rewarded for destroying uplinks equal to the amount for teams spawns would be lovely but that ridiculous. People use so much equipment in a battle that WP logistics would receive would make it unbalanced. There is just so much equipment that's always being used. As for receiving WP for hacking, that makes less sense. When go to the trouble of hacking something that can easily be destroyed. There all limited use and have as much health(actually less) than that of the combined shield/armor of a light dropsuit. sure, that many WP would be great but I like to go for more of a realistic approach when making requests. If your looking for something that would give a large number of WP for hacking and perhaps: [quote=Cross AtupÇìps ~ fix uplinks being seeing everywhere and patch the ability for uplinks to be glitched into solid objects.[/quote] as Cross Atu suggested, that seems like something the should be suggested when calling installations are implemented.(If they decided to even add it)
Bettie Boop 2100190003 A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. League of Infamy 70	Posted - 2013.07.30 18:32:00 - [14] - Quote 1 WP Militia, 3 WP Advanced, 5 WP Prototype, and 10WP Arum. Anything more than 5 WP and it just turns into an WP exploit.
Rusty Sandstorm Raven Accord Black Core Alliance 2	Posted - 2013.07.31 00:39:00 - [15] - Quote 25 wp. The same amount you get for having someone spawn on an uplink. If it's in the game, people are going to find a way to exploit it.... like the teams who know what they're doing and drop 15 uplinks around the map, and you don't get any points for destroying them.
ALPHA DECRIPTER M.E.R.C. Conventional Forces D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 179	Posted - 2013.07.31 00:44:00 - [16] - Quote If I could hack equipment then I would have a use for my hacker fit in ambush games... go for it 2-5 WP is enough as my hacker fit is designed to place uplinks, hack, and destroy equipment and business is already pretty good . `Sigh. Just another fun game of DUST .


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.