DUST Search - Make Skirmish Queue tied to FW??

All Channels

General Discussions

Make Skirmish Queue tied to FW??

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Beren Hurin K-A-O-S theory 812	Posted - 2013.07.24 19:00:00 - [1] - Quote Why not make people queueing for skirmish become ringers for FW then you can probably fill more battles? You could sort of make FW a release valve for skirmish. You could say that no more than 25% of players would come from the instant queue just to make sure you aren't putting too many there unwittingly. But if you don't care who you are playing for (which is what you are saying when you queue) then you shouldn't care for FW.
Forlorn Destrier Bullet Cluster 1219	Posted - 2013.07.24 19:06:00 - [2] - Quote Beren Hurin wrote: Why not make people queueing for skirmish become ringers for FW then you can probably fill more battles? You could sort of make FW a release valve for skirmish. You could say that no more than 25% of players would come from the instant queue just to make sure you aren't putting too many there unwittingly. But if you don't care who you are playing for (which is what you are saying when you queue) then you shouldn't care for FW. The only issue with is that I never fight for Caldari or Minmater. There would have to be an option to choose your side, or I would not like this at all.
Beren Hurin K-A-O-S theory 812	Posted - 2013.07.24 19:07:00 - [3] - Quote Forlorn Destrier wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Why not make people queueing for skirmish become ringers for FW then you can probably fill more battles? You could sort of make FW a release valve for skirmish. You could say that no more than 25% of players would come from the instant queue just to make sure you aren't putting too many there unwittingly. But if you don't care who you are playing for (which is what you are saying when you queue) then you shouldn't care for FW. The only issue with is that I never fight for Caldari or Minmater. There would have to be an option to choose your side, or I would not like this at all. Do you leave games in instant battle where you fight for one or the other? Because they have empire NPC corps that you fight for still in instant.
Django Quik R.I.f.t 1047	Posted - 2013.07.24 20:34:00 - [4] - Quote As if FW matches don't already get filled up instantly anyway - it's hard enough to stack 2 or more squads into the same game as it is.
Beren Hurin K-A-O-S theory 814	Posted - 2013.07.24 22:03:00 - [5] - Quote This is more about matching the concern with spawning too many FW battles.
HYENAKILLER X Condotta Rouvenor Gallente Federation 81	Posted - 2013.07.24 22:35:00 - [6] - Quote What is fw?
Kane Fyea DUST University Ivy League 1434	Posted - 2013.07.24 22:37:00 - [7] - Quote HYENAKILLER X wrote: What is fw? Factional Warfare.
True Adamance PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris 824	Posted - 2013.07.24 23:14:00 - [8] - Quote Beren Hurin wrote: Why not make people queueing for skirmish become ringers for FW then you can probably fill more battles? You could sort of make FW a release valve for skirmish. You could say that no more than 25% of players would come from the instant queue just to make sure you aren't putting too many there unwittingly. But if you don't care who you are playing for (which is what you are saying when you queue) then you shouldn't care for FW. Why the hell would you want that? If you don't care about FW and its implications why would you even want FW as an off shoot of Pub matches...... I guarantee you are one of those people who don't care who they fight for....
Beren Hurin K-A-O-S theory 817	Posted - 2013.07.24 23:33:00 - [9] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Why not make people queueing for skirmish become ringers for FW then you can probably fill more battles? You could sort of make FW a release valve for skirmish. You could say that no more than 25% of players would come from the instant queue just to make sure you aren't putting too many there unwittingly. But if you don't care who you are playing for (which is what you are saying when you queue) then you shouldn't care for FW. Why the hell would you want that? If you don't care about FW and its implications why would you even want FW as an off shoot of Pub matches...... I guarantee you are one of those people who don't care who they fight for.... sigh so quick to accuse. The problem right now is they don't wan to spawn too many machete because they are concerned about having too many matches with too few people. So if a match was only slowly filling, the quick match would end up filling it. Right now the choice is small numbers of matches or more matches with the possibility of pubbies. So you think that trying to come up with an idea that generates more FW matches makes me not care about FW?
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 2484	Posted - 2013.07.24 23:40:00 - [10] - Quote Personally, I don't spend money on instant battles I put everything into winning FW I want to know when I'm in a FW battle. If I'm put on the wrong side, I'll just mess around and/or mess up my own team.

Beren Hurin K-A-O-S theory 817	Posted - 2013.07.24 23:42:00 - [11] - Quote Scheneighnay McBob wrote: Personally, I don't spend money on instant battles I put everything into winning FW I want to know when I'm in a FW battle. If I'm put on the wrong side, I'll just mess around and/or mess up my own team. Well you already know where and who you are fighting.
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. Interstellar Murder of Crows 735	Posted - 2013.07.24 23:46:00 - [12] - Quote True Adamance wrote: Beren Hurin wrote: Why not make people queueing for skirmish become ringers for FW then you can probably fill more battles? You could sort of make FW a release valve for skirmish. You could say that no more than 25% of players would come from the instant queue just to make sure you aren't putting too many there unwittingly. But if you don't care who you are playing for (which is what you are saying when you queue) then you shouldn't care for FW. Why the hell would you want that? If you don't care about FW and its implications why would you even want FW as an off shoot of Pub matches...... I guarantee you are one of those people who don't care who they fight for.... Much as I hate to admit it, I have to agree with the PIE pigdog. I mean, as it is now, the only (and I mean ONLY) difference is that you can choose which side you're on. If we were to pull "FW ringers" from the skirmish queue, why have FW at all?


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.