DUST Search - I know this will get QQ and Hate but...

All Channels

General Discussions

I know this will get QQ and Hate but...

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 300	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:12:00 - [1] - Quote CCP has done a Decent Job, Good by no means, but for 30-ish people this aint too bad, coding on an all new engine that they had to work with, dealing with the mess known as the PS3, and making a game that is different from anything they have had experience with Big Good thing Doing so much with so little in so little time with such great expectations, on a dying system. Big Bad thing Less than ideal interactions with the community (slow, listens to extremes on both sides, doesn't look at player ideas as viable solutions) Minor Good things Can't think of many At the moment Minor bad things Too Heavy on Nerfs and Buffs Balencing issues, Tanks/AV or Armor/Shields on Dropsuits and Vehicles Lack of Matchmaking Gives only one section of the playerbase most of their possible choices (Medium Suits) What Do you think? How would you fix these problems?
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 300	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:12:00 - [2] - Quote Reserved for fixes.
EternalRMG Ostrakon Agency Gallente Federation 443	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:14:00 - [3] - Quote you forgot the worse thing: Making Dropships useless and super expensive No WP for us or or things like that or the fact, that a LLAV acn survive more than a tank
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 300	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:15:00 - [4] - Quote EternalRMG wrote: you forgot the worse thing: Making Dropships useless and super expensive That is under Vehicles vs AV
Niuvo The Phoenix Federation 289	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:15:00 - [5] - Quote I hope they are trying hard.
GTA-V FTW Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation 133	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:20:00 - [6] - Quote Meh broke game is broke. But hey its free and you do get what you pay for.
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 300	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:21:00 - [7] - Quote Niuvo wrote: I hope they are trying hard. They lack an EP (Executive Producer not Epeen) so I will give them some slack but FoxFour has posted often on the forums so at least one dev is listening or shows that he is.
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 300	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:22:00 - [8] - Quote GTA-V FTW wrote: Meh broke game is broke. But hey its free and you do get what you pay for. Any Constructive Critisism or just QQ?
GTA-V FTW Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation 133	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:26:00 - [9] - Quote Killar-12 wrote: GTA-V FTW wrote: Meh broke game is broke. But hey its free and you do get what you pay for. Any Constructive Critisism or just QQ? I am not QQing I am saying it is a F2P lobby FPS with broke core mechanics and to not get your hopes up. Broke game is broke game you get what you pay for and if you don't hold high exspectations then you won't QQ.
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 301	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:28:00 - [10] - Quote GTA-V FTW wrote: Killar-12 wrote: GTA-V FTW wrote: Meh broke game is broke. But hey its free and you do get what you pay for. Any Constructive Critisism or just QQ? I am not QQing I am saying it is a F2P lobby FPS with broke core mechanics and to not get your hopes up. Broke game is broke game you get what you pay for and if you don't hold high exspectations then you won't QQ. Okay how would you fix the game? I general Ideas are nice stats are awesome.

Spectre-M The Generals EoN. 6	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:33:00 - [11] - Quote I think thier new stance on doing more frequent smaller fixes is good. It gives us less wait time to tryout new changes and achieve a little blanace sooner. It also means they dont have to bite off so much in one update only to find out something doesnt work as they wanted. granted there are alot of core mechanics that need attending to, but at least they are polishing what we do have, and maybe impliment larger fixes in a more comfortable pace.
GTA-V FTW Mannar Focused Warfare Gallente Federation 135	Posted - 2013.07.23 22:43:00 - [12] - Quote Killar-12 wrote: GTA-V FTW wrote: Killar-12 wrote: GTA-V FTW wrote: Meh broke game is broke. But hey its free and you do get what you pay for. Any Constructive Critisism or just QQ? I am not QQing I am saying it is a F2P lobby FPS with broke core mechanics and to not get your hopes up. Broke game is broke game you get what you pay for and if you don't hold high exspectations then you won't QQ. Okay how would you fix the game? I general Ideas are nice stats are awesome. You see I do not feel as though I should have to tell CCP how to fix their broke game. Why waist my time, we see how well that is going for the Derpship pilots don't we? This is what CCP needs to do, they need to fix the core mechanics. In fact this game should not have been released with such poor game design. CCP fix your broke core mechanics, as you being a game developer I would hope we the gamers would not have to hold your hands on this one. What CCP needs to hear from me is hey your game is still broke go back to the drawing board and fix it.
Robocop Junior The Surrogates Of War 6	Posted - 2013.07.24 00:55:00 - [13] - Quote Mess that PS3 is? Dying system? I am confuzzled.
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 306	Posted - 2013.07.24 01:00:00 - [14] - Quote Robocop Junior wrote: Mess that PS3 is? Dying system? I am confuzzled. PS3's have a reputation for being difficult to make games for due to their unique hardware setup. PS4 is coming out = dying, It still will work but wont be where new games go so.
Eriknaught Vader's Taco Shack 104	Posted - 2013.07.24 01:02:00 - [15] - Quote Killar-12 wrote: CCP has done a Decent Job, Good by no means, but for 30-ish people this aint too bad, coding on an all new engine that they had to work with, dealing with the mess known as the PS3, and making a game that is different from anything they have had experience with Big Good thing Doing so much with so little in so little time with such great expectations, on a dying system. Big Bad thing Less than ideal interactions with the community (slow, listens to extremes on both sides, doesn't look at player ideas as viable solutions) Minor Good things Can't think of many At the moment Minor bad things Too Heavy on Nerfs and Buffs Balencing issues, Tanks/AV or Armor/Shields on Dropsuits and Vehicles Lack of Matchmaking Gives only one section of the playerbase most of their possible choices (Medium Suits) What Do you think? How would you fix these problems? I think this game RULES. Been here for awhile now & stand by that. The whole "potential only goes so far" argument is understandable, but what else am I gonna play to get my Space Marine on? Halo? No thank you. Sure this game has problems, but I don't care. Long live Dust514, o7 That is all. Eriknaught out. END TRANSMISSION.
J'Jor Da'Wg KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 860	Posted - 2013.07.24 01:12:00 - [16] - Quote Where the heck did you get that they only have 30 people working on this from?
Killar-12 Intrepidus XI EoN. 307	Posted - 2013.07.24 01:50:00 - [17] - Quote J'Jor Da'Wg wrote: Where the heck did you get that they only have 30 people working on this from? I can't find the thread But remember seeing it some where


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.