| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Godin Thekiller
Ghost Wolf Industries
Alpha Wolf Pack
269
   |
Posted - 2013.07.13 13:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
Compressed: Worse Damage than the Scattered, lowest ROF, higher heat buildup than every last blaster, and the lowest range. The thing's bloody useless. Might as well remove it.
Stabilized: I'm assuming it's supposed to be fittable on Caldari HAV's (it's a ranged blaster), but why does does it have the highest total PG requirements? Shouldn't it have the lowest?
Peace, Godin  |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command
Caldari State
263
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 16:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Hmm, I don't use hybrids on my wimpy Sica, so these are a new issue to me.
All need to be fixed. What I want is that the turret mount on to match the rest of the vehicle, so my tank doesn't look so wanky when I fit blasters. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
846
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 17:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Godin Thekiller wrote:Compressed: Worse Damage than the Scattered, lowest ROF, higher heat buildup than every last blaster, and the lowest range. The thing's bloody useless. Might as well remove it. Stabilized: I'm assuming it's supposed to be fittable on Caldari HAV's (it's a ranged blaster), but why does does it have the highest total PG requirements? Shouldn't it have the lowest? Peace, Godin
its Gallente, its not meant to be fitted on Caldari in normal fitting. actually all the large blaster are not meant to be fitted on caldari as a gallente weapon, but its don't really work the other way round. missiles are caldari and meant to be fitted on caldari HAVs but not meant to be fitted on gallente HAVs normally but they can easy. so yea.... and rails have nearly the same fitting requirements as missiles. but hey it supports CCP ideals that gallente HAVs are meant to beat caldari's in every single way. i dare anyone to prove me wrong, the whole resistance versus missiles doesn't really count because their repairers. |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command
Caldari State
264
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 17:55:00 -
[4] - Quote
So, I'm using CalHAV, so I have to use lolMissiles?
It's like saying that those Abaddens out there with large auto cannons are not doing it right?
You should get bonuses to the reduction in fitting resources for fitting a Missle on a CalHAV, and for fitting a blaster on a GalHAV.
But your argument that CalHAVs shouldn't be fitting Blasters, would relegate CalHAVs to long range rail snipers. |
shaman oga
Nexus Balusa Horizon
DARKSTAR ARMY
291
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 19:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
only in the ADV version compressed do less damage than the scattered, but i agree with you on the stabilized its pg/cpu requirement is too high, it should require the same pg/cpu of the other versions or do the same damage of another blaster to justify this requirements.
Almost everybody use scattered and they work well, that's why i haven't read any request on the other variants of blasters before. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
Lokun Listamenn
846
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 20:15:00 -
[6] - Quote
Meeko Fent wrote:
But your argument that CalHAVs shouldn't be fitting Blasters, would relegate CalHAVs to long range rail snipers.
im guessing this is a reply to my post about the type of large turrets, as i said armor has no problem fitting them(armor wins here so they can't even do that), but i was going off of basic/standard normal fits for each
blaster gunnlogi w/ a heavy extender& heavy can fit the basic blaster, barely with 2 local piwergrid upgrades(the 15%ers.)
while a maddy w/ a 180mm plate& heavy rep can fit an advanced blaster. just from the normal ones
that is 15 points of damage per shot more and everyone knows that armor has the most tank, speed, resistance & regen ability, so add damage on top of that so CalHAVs are doomed to sit on the sidelines and wait for a change for the better. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |