Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Not Guilty EoN.
802
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Why not |
Krom Ganesh
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
180
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
Because War Points are supposed to be an estimation of your contribution to the battle. A dead merc is a dead merc regardless if you put 1 bullet in his head or 3 in his chest. |
Meeko Fent
Seituoda Taskforce Command Caldari State
248
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
No Headshot WP.
A Headshot HUD indication, but no extra WP. |
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Not Guilty EoN.
802
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
So what you're telling me is efficiency on the battle field with your limited bullets should be frowned upon? |
Krom Ganesh
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
180
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
However, you bring your own guns to the battle. The cost of ammo is on you (technically), not the person paying you who does care about your contribution to the battle (even if that employer is currently an automated isk printing machine...). |
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Not Guilty EoN.
802
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:16:00 -
[6] - Quote
You don't find that your contractors who pay for your clones, wouldn't rather have a team that finishes the enemy as quick as possible? |
Oso Peresoso
RisingSuns
272
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:35:00 -
[7] - Quote
Krom Ganesh wrote:Because War Points are supposed to be an estimation of your contribution to the battle. A dead merc is a dead merc regardless if you put 1 bullet in his head or 3 in his chest.
Considering the proliferation of nanite injectors since they've been fixed (and the willingness of people to wait to be picked up), getting a headshot can be the difference between a completely superficial contribution or a important one.
Yes OP, more WP for headshot. Exactly 5 more WP than without a headshot. |
Malkai Inos
Opus Arcana Covert Intervention
646
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sponglyboy Squaredoo wrote:You don't find that your contractors who pay for your clones, wouldn't rather have a team that finishes the enemy as quick as possible? Sure, but they couln't care less about how it's done.
Edit for interesting idea:Oso Peresoso wrote: Considering the proliferation of nanite injectors since they've been fixed (and the willingness of people to wait to be picked up), getting a headshot can be the difference between a completely superficial contribution or a important one.
Yes OP, more WP for headshot. Exactly 5 more WP than without a headshot.
That is actually a good point. Then again there are other ways for overkilling an enemy. Make it a +5wp for overkill now matter how it's done and you have my support. |
Krom Ganesh
Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire
181
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 20:40:00 -
[9] - Quote
^ This seems reasonable and accomplishes your goal |
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Not Guilty EoN.
802
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 21:59:00 -
[10] - Quote
Malkai Inos wrote:[quote=Sponglyboy Squaredoo]You don't find that your contractors who pay for your clones, wouldn't rather have a team that finishes the enemy as quick as possible? Sure, but they couldn't care less about how it's done.
False. A headshot finishes the enemy. A normal body shot would allow the enemy to get revived |
|
Sinboto Simmons
Sver true blood Public Disorder.
611
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 22:02:00 -
[11] - Quote
Considering my mass driver puts hostiles down for good this mean I get +5 for that too? |
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Not Guilty EoN.
803
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 22:13:00 -
[12] - Quote
Sinboto Simmons wrote:Considering my mass driver puts hostiles down for good this mean I get +5 for that too? Sure. Not much people use mass driver anyway. This could increase the mass driver population |
Buster Friently
Rosen Association
1099
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 22:16:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sponglyboy Squaredoo wrote:You don't find that your contractors who pay for your clones, wouldn't rather have a team that finishes the enemy as quick as possible?
Headshots are, frankly, a stupid mechanic anyway.
It's far from the most efficient way to kill. Why would you shoot at the most heavily armored piece of a dropsuit anyway?
If you're going for efficiency, I'd say sniper kills to the body, or forge gun kills maybe, or sniper tank kills or RE kills, hell even grenade kills could be far more efficient than attempting head shots even with the stupid extra multiplier to head damage we have in game now.
Besides, anyone now, can shoot at the bleeding out clone to finish them off. |
Sponglyboy Squaredoo
Not Guilty EoN.
803
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 22:18:00 -
[14] - Quote
Buster Friently wrote:Sponglyboy Squaredoo wrote:You don't find that your contractors who pay for your clones, wouldn't rather have a team that finishes the enemy as quick as possible? Headshots are, frankly, a stupid mechanic anyway. It's far from the most efficient way to kill. Why would you shoot at the most heavily armored piece of a dropsuit anyway? If you're going for efficiency, I'd say sniper kills to the body, or forge gun kills maybe, or sniper tank kills or RE kills, hell even grenade kills could be far more efficient than attempting head shots even with the stupid extra multiplier to head damage we have in game now. Besides, anyone now, can shoot at the bleeding out clone to finish them off. Lets not get off topic now. We are talking about "BULLETS" |
KING CHECKMATE
A.N.O.N.Y.M.O.U.S. League of Infamy
363
|
Posted - 2013.07.11 22:26:00 -
[15] - Quote
Krom Ganesh wrote:Because War Points are supposed to be an estimation of your contribution to the battle. A dead merc is a dead merc regardless if you put 1 bullet in his head or 3 in his chest.
I think rewarding mercenaries for good aim is a plus. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |