| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
2Bee Smith
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
1
   |
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
3079
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision
Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too?
Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too?
Your logic is such fail it's absurd. |
Syther Shadows
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
187
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too? Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too? Your logic is such fail it's absurd.
But there still needs to be a little effort big out put weapon for noobs otherwise they will not get drawn into the game
|
2Bee Smith
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:49:00 -
[4] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too? Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too? Your logic is such fail it's absurd.
No, not at all. Literally everyone can get them, everyone's on an equal playing field. I was there when the TAC-AR was king but I didn't have the chance to use it, why? Because I was saving my skill points for something else.
The abuse problem isn't with the Energizer, its with the Caldari Logi and other OP suits like that.
Edit: I understand that the Energizers are a bit unbalanced in their pure statistical form(But the main problem are the actual dropsuits themselves, not this specific module), but what I'm applauding is the no skill requirement. This should be done with more minor things (like codebreakers, Kinetic Catalyzers) to help the new players |
Nocturnal Soul
Immortal Retribution
23
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:50:00 -
[5] - Quote
its just stupid in its purest form |
Spectral Clone
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
52
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
Syther Shadows wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too? Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too? Your logic is such fail it's absurd. But there still needs to be a little effort big out put weapon for noobs otherwise they will not get drawn into the game
HMG |
Novawolf McDustingham The514th
The Official Mintchip Fanclub
322
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
Why don't you congratulate cancer for its 1 trillionth kill while you're at it. |
KOBLAKA1
Opus Arcana
Covert Intervention
191
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 07:54:00 -
[8] - Quote
Spectral Clone wrote:Syther Shadows wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too? Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too? Your logic is such fail it's absurd. But there still needs to be a little effort big out put weapon for noobs otherwise they will not get drawn into the game HMG
LMFAO
that is all |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
3082
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:09:00 -
[9] - Quote
2Bee Smith wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too? Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too? Your logic is such fail it's absurd. No, not at all. Literally everyone can get them, everyone's on an equal playing field. I was there when the TAC-AR was king but I didn't have the chance to use it, why? Because I was saving my skill points for something else. The abuse problem isn't with the Energizer, its with the Caldari Logi and other OP suits like that. Edit: I understand that the Energizers are a bit unbalanced in their pure statistical form(But the main problem are the actual dropsuits themselves, not this specific module), but what I'm applauding is the no skill requirement. This should be done with more minor things (like codebreakers, Kinetic Catalyzers) to help the new players
....
You're serious aren't you?
You realize your applauding CCP for making armor seem even more like junk? That's not helping noobs - that isolating a part of the community to think, "Wtf am I doing with armor?" |
Vyzion Eyri
The Southern Legion
RISE of LEGION
785
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
2Bee Smith wrote:No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
No, just skills to reduce the CPU costs of all other items of the fitting, as well as the core dropsuit upgrades to increase max. CPU, as well as SP into CPU enhancers just to be able to ensure the fitting is valid.
|
|
|
2Bee Smith
The Unholy Legion Of DarkStar
DARKSTAR ARMY
2
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:19:00 -
[11] - Quote
SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:SoTa PoP wrote:2Bee Smith wrote:At first I was in the same boat as everyone else on the shield energizers requiring no skills but then i realized something while reading a thread. No skills on shield energizers means less SP that new players have to waste.
Honestly this was a BRILLIANT move on your part. It doesn't completely remove the fact that new players get ROFLstomped but it does help it. Thanks for this awesome decision Are you ******* kidding me? Ignore how others can abuse this since noobs can abuse it too? Why not congratz them in the past for OP AR TAC since noobs could pwn anyone with it too? Your logic is such fail it's absurd. No, not at all. Literally everyone can get them, everyone's on an equal playing field. I was there when the TAC-AR was king but I didn't have the chance to use it, why? Because I was saving my skill points for something else. The abuse problem isn't with the Energizer, its with the Caldari Logi and other OP suits like that. Edit: I understand that the Energizers are a bit unbalanced in their pure statistical form(But the main problem are the actual dropsuits themselves, not this specific module), but what I'm applauding is the no skill requirement. This should be done with more minor things (like codebreakers, Kinetic Catalyzers) to help the new players .... You're serious aren't you? You realize your applauding CCP for making armor seem even more like junk? That's not helping noobs - that isolating a part of the community to think, "Wtf am I doing with armor?"
I know that armor is weaker right now, everyone does. I have an alt that I skilled into Amarr Medium w/ Armor tanking.
But they're not making armor seem junky, armor got 2 new plates sure they're kind of bad, but its a start and CCP is trying their best to address the problem. |
SoTa PoP
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
3083
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:23:00 -
[12] - Quote
2Bee Smith wrote:
armor got 2 new plates sure they're kind of bad,
2Bee Smith wrote: Thanks for this awesome decision
 |
KEROSIINI-TERO
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
515
|
Posted - 2013.07.03 08:26:00 -
[13] - Quote
Consider this cheap zero-SP time as testing time.
Testing before they get their own skill. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |