Let's evaluate here all of your responses to my posts:
Pardon my cinicism, but seeing how you are in Team Players (cause being in teamplayers means you go protostomp noobs all day when our 2 most visible players, Cubs and our CEO Hightimes run in 32k fits in every pub match they play), I would bet all those 23k adn 7.0 came from proto stomping noobs.
(You were wrong about your assertions here.)
I thought the only reason to protostomp was to have a kdr of of at least 7. (Never verified, a wrong dubious assertion here again) I am not gonna argue against that he is a beast or a god or a stud, I don't know who he is and I don't care. I am saying that kdr of 7 is possible with just about any weapon when proto stumping. (proved you were wrong about this one as well because i have proof from the players who do have that kind of KDR vs you who just dismissed it because that's all you could do.) So, it's a weak argument for why MD is a viable and balanced weapon. (No, if a good player can use it well, then why should I believe you're not just a noob who would be qq'ing over the HMG when it's perfectly fine like people are currently doing? or people qq'ing about nova knives being OP?) -_-
My response:
I respectfully disagree.
the plasma cannon cannot get a kdr of seven, and if the MD was as busted as it is then obtaining a 7 KDR would be impossible.
the lazer cannot get you a kdr of seven, and if the MD was as busted as it is then obtaining a 7 KDR would be impossible.
People can achieve a KDR of 7 with the mass driver and maintain it post uprising, so it seem like that is evidence in favor of my r
Even some of the best pubstomping campers can't get a kdr of 7. Like I said, there are fewer than 50 people on dust that have a kdr of 7 or higher (that have more than 8k kills and actually play) and even fewer if you really consider that many of those people are tankers. It proves a lot...name one bad player that has that 7 or higher KDR and I will rescind. (see this providing leeway for me to change my opinion? notice you never include any such statements in yours? Hmm)
Your response:
Oh come on. KDR is such a lame metric in this game. I wont be able to name anyone simply because I dont pay attention to KDR. (and of course because it's impossible even if you chose to
) KDR is something that protostomping corps use when they recruit and compare epeens inside the corp. (Oh so that's how you assume it goes cause you've been in how many of those corps?
the butthurt is strong with this one) It has zero relevance to the game play and is a poor correlate to the skill. (in truth, as aforementioned, a player with that high of a KDR can't be a bad player using proto, they can't even be a good player using proto like Nikia Bethune, or King Kobrah, is has to be someone extremely exceptional, but of course it's easier for you to deny that and proffer weak arguments against it so please feel free) I can't tell you how many times I ve seen players from negative feedback back out from pub games when they play solo on a losing side (even if their side does not lose but comes close) just to save their KDR status (assuming intent
) If it was all about inflating KDR then they wouldn't be the most winningest corp on dust
). Yes, it's true that a bad player won't get KDR of 7 no matter what. (a welcome submission) Beyond that anyone with average skill can get that KDR if they want it. (Proof it's not an assertion? oh wait, you don't want to do that, you just want to throw out assertions without fact behind it cause that's easier than using facts and data and people's experiences sans your own
) In this game it's too easy to stack up proto equipment in your favor and then just carefully pick your fights. (maybe sometimes, but not always...or every decent sniper would have a 100 kdr
and all these tryhards would just redline snipe right?
) The reason why there are not more ppl with a high KDR is because actually few ppl care that much about it to try to maintain it. (Exactly, meaning the ones who achieve that are the ones who earned 7 or higher kdr's, another wecome submission
) I am saying all of that to say that your argument about using one MD user maintaining a high KDR as an example to support you argument that MD is not a weak weapon is weak. (I think we're done here
)