DUST Search - PC Battles make no sense

iceyburnz wrote:

SoTa PoP wrote:

Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash.

I miss my old Beta excuse as this game sure as hell does seem like a beta.

No one is happy here anymore. Nothing we were promised was given:

No RTS element
No sandbox element (Oh yay we can switch a single building around to somethin we've seen x100 in pubs)
Can't drive MCC
Can't drop installations
No roles
No incentive to grind for months for new players to create there perfect soldier because there's no such thing - they have to work within the boundaries of CCP's idea of what's balance.
No balance to begin with in weaponry and vehicle.
No good game modes
Player count in battles are pathetically small for what they claimed.

I know I know.

I agree 100%, personally will yo keep playing and paying until the end of the year. CCP always plays thier hand close to thier chest, you start to suffer burn out and then suddenly, they whip out a new feature and your like "oh man, I guess I'll play a little more".

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2461	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:31:00 - [1] - Quote Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash. I miss my old Beta excuse as this game sure as hell does seem like a beta. No one is happy here anymore. Nothing we were promised was given: No RTS element No sandbox element (Oh yay we can switch a single building around to somethin we've seen x100 in pubs) Can't drive MCC Can't drop installations No roles No incentive to grind for months for new players to create there perfect soldier because there's no such thing - they have to work within the boundaries of CCP's idea of what's balance. No balance to begin with in weaponry and vehicle. No good game modes Player count in battles are pathetically small for what they claimed. And worst of all - No promises to fix any of this before a year.
HowDidThatTaste Imperfects Negative-Feedback 2633	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:32:00 - [2] - Quote Band wagon https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=85966&find=unread
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2461	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:33:00 - [3] - Quote HowDidThatTaste wrote: Band wagon All aboard the CCP sux train express! Choot choot!
Assert Dominance Ahrendee Mercenaries Omega Commission 31	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:39:00 - [4] - Quote How much isk for a front row seat?
SATAN'S PRODIGY D3LTA FORC3 Orion Empire 5	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:44:00 - [5] - Quote 100% accurate post.
iceyburnz Crux Special Tasks Group Gallente Federation 616	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:44:00 - [6] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash. I miss my old Beta excuse as this game sure as hell does seem like a beta. No one is happy here anymore. Nothing we were promised was given: No RTS element No sandbox element (Oh yay we can switch a single building around to somethin we've seen x100 in pubs) Can't drive MCC Can't drop installations No roles No incentive to grind for months for new players to create there perfect soldier because there's no such thing - they have to work within the boundaries of CCP's idea of what's balance. No balance to begin with in weaponry and vehicle. No good game modes Player count in battles are pathetically small for what they claimed. I know I know. I agree 100%, personally will yo keep playing and paying until the end of the year. CCP always plays thier hand close to thier chest, you start to suffer burn out and then suddenly, they whip out a new feature and your like "oh man, I guess I'll play a little more".
Chilled Pill Pro Hic Immortalis 87	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:49:00 - [7] - Quote Agreed. For a moment I thought about buying a Vet or Elite Pack....then the moment passed. And I flushed.
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2463	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:50:00 - [8] - Quote iceyburnz wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash. I miss my old Beta excuse as this game sure as hell does seem like a beta. No one is happy here anymore. Nothing we were promised was given: No RTS element No sandbox element (Oh yay we can switch a single building around to somethin we've seen x100 in pubs) Can't drive MCC Can't drop installations No roles No incentive to grind for months for new players to create there perfect soldier because there's no such thing - they have to work within the boundaries of CCP's idea of what's balance. No balance to begin with in weaponry and vehicle. No good game modes Player count in battles are pathetically small for what they claimed. I know I know. I agree 100%, personally will yo keep playing and paying until the end of the year. CCP always plays thier hand close to thier chest, you start to suffer burn out and then suddenly, they whip out a new feature and your like "oh man, I guess I'll play a little more". more content won't be coming for 4-5 months though. So suffering a burn out this early is a really bad sign. Even corps that are winning PC matches are pulling out now... -.-
Tectonious Falcon Phaze O n e 523	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:52:00 - [9] - Quote Free seats for your PR guy?
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2463	Posted - 2013.06.09 11:53:00 - [10] - Quote Tectonious Falcon wrote: Free seats for your PR guy? Seats are all yours ^_^ Here's some friend passes too - not like anyone else is playing this game anymore to come watch lol

Allah's Snackbar Forty-Nine Fedayeen Minmatar Republic 92	Posted - 2013.06.09 12:41:00 - [11] - Quote Assert Dominance wrote: How much isk for a front row seat? CCP marketing are preparing to release AUR forum popcorn.
Surt gods end Demon Ronin 258	Posted - 2013.06.09 12:52:00 - [12] - Quote Hahaha. I noticed that a bit back. But was waiting to see who was going to say something about it. PC= Corp battle. Your right. Makes bloody no sence. It suppose to be your land which should always put you guys as defenders. you shouldn't have to cap objectives.
BIingBIaine Ringer For Hire 2	Posted - 2013.06.09 17:40:00 - [13] - Quote http://youtu.be/9md61EpQ9sw Here is an educated answer to your issue
Alaika Arbosa Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc. 336	Posted - 2013.06.09 17:42:00 - [14] - Quote Chilled Pill wrote: Agreed. For a moment I thought about buying a Vet or Elite Pack....then the moment passed. And I flushed. When I see legitimate movement in a direction I approve of, then I'll spend cash again.
Zatara Rought TeamPlayers EoN. 193	Posted - 2013.06.09 18:39:00 - [15] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash. I've suggested that all objectives should be capped red at the beginning but that the cannons must be activated by the soldier perhaps because they don't have coordinates for which target to attack until entered, or maybe they all begin red for the attacker and you have to hack it..that'd def be an advantage. And possibly, if amiable you could give the defender and advantage because while the enemy team must hack it the defending team only must remove the hack, and provide like a bonus to their hack speed when defending. Just throwing out ideas. XD
Cenex Langly D.A.R.K L.E.G.I.O.N D.E.F.I.A.N.C.E 32	Posted - 2013.06.09 18:52:00 - [16] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash. I miss my old Beta excuse as this game sure as hell does seem like a beta. No one is happy here anymore. Nothing we were promised was given: No RTS element No sandbox element (Oh yay we can switch a single building around to somethin we've seen x100 in pubs) Can't drive MCC Can't drop installations No roles No incentive to grind for months for new players to create there perfect soldier because there's no such thing - they have to work within the boundaries of CCP's idea of what's balance. No balance to begin with in weaponry and vehicle. No good game modes Player count in battles are pathetically small for what they claimed. And worst of all - No promises to fix any of this before a year. I agree with everything you have said.
VEXation Gunn Imperfects Negative-Feedback 165	Posted - 2013.06.09 18:59:00 - [17] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Why does the defending side need to cap neutral objectives? They OWN the district - it's THERE LAND. shouldn't they have a defense set up and ready for attacks? Trying to defend this crap of a game to new players who ask questions is impossible. Everyone has some good reason to think DUST is trash. I miss my old Beta excuse as this game sure as hell does seem like a beta. No one is happy here anymore. Nothing we were promised was given: No RTS element No sandbox element (Oh yay we can switch a single building around to somethin we've seen x100 in pubs) Can't drive MCC Can't drop installations No roles No incentive to grind for months for new players to create there perfect soldier because there's no such thing - they have to work within the boundaries of CCP's idea of what's balance. No balance to begin with in weaponry and vehicle. No good game modes Player count in battles are pathetically small for what they claimed. And worst of all - No promises to fix any of this before a year. why you copycat my thread idea. Get your on "dust is bad thread idea"


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page