DUST Search - Time to lol at the Tac rifle Patch.

All Channels

General Discussions

Time to lol at the Tac rifle Patch.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
TheReaper545 Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 6	Posted - 2013.06.06 04:40:00 - [1] - Quote The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time.
THEDRiZZLE Aqua teen Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 5	Posted - 2013.06.06 04:42:00 - [2] - Quote Dmg is srill to high but that wouldnt matter if ccp made it so bullets went more then 20 feet it wouldnt even be a problem
Don Von Hulio Not Guilty EoN. 295	Posted - 2013.06.06 04:43:00 - [3] - Quote Ya i dont understand all this boohoo about it. It was OP and now its not and those who grew accustomed to it want it back. Kinda like the USAS+Frag Rounds in BF3.... the TAC wasnt as OP as it was, but damn when it was taken away people cried like none other.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:03:00 - [4] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please...
Malkai Inos Opus Arcana Orion Empire 310	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:06:00 - [5] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Sucks to be the only one who is still QQing about his toy, heh.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 4219	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:08:00 - [6] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... He's lying, the tac rifle sucks. What you should REALLY spec into now is the mass driver, that thing is sooo amazing, it shoots grenades, you'll be going 70/0 with it, trust me. Keep demanding that CCP gives you a respec for those AR skills you now regret now that the tac rifle is dead, then spend the skills all on mass driver.
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1762	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:09:00 - [7] - Quote Malkai Inos wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Sucks to be the only one who is still QQing about his toy, heh. lol, Pidgey, while a good at the game, is also an idiot
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:10:00 - [8] - Quote Malkai Inos wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Sucks to be the only one who is still QQing about his toy, heh. I can play any weapon in this game and still be the best, Hell I don't even need a gun and I'd still be better then the majority. It's the principle of catering to players who aren't good at the game and don't play it at it's highest levels, there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:11:00 - [9] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Sucks to be the only one who is still QQing about his toy, heh. lol, Pidgey, while a good at the game, is also an idiot say's the guy who can't figure out how to be good at a video game
TheReaper545 Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 6	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:16:00 - [10] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Or instead of dis-belief and possible "possible" qq pick the gun back up and actually attempt to use it I shouldn't have to prove the gun still works you have to prove it to yourself that the gun still works.

Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1762	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:17:00 - [11] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: Malkai Inos wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Sucks to be the only one who is still QQing about his toy, heh. lol, Pidgey, while a good at the game, is also an idiot say's the guy who can't figure out how to be good at a video game
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:19:00 - [12] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Or instead of dis-belief and possible "possible" qq pick the gun back up and actually attempt to use it I shouldn't have to prove the gun still works you have to prove it to yourself that the gun still works. What game mode simple question?
Commander Tuna KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 55	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:22:00 - [13] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. Not here to argue about wether the nerf was successful but don't tell me that the tac ar is still good for cqc.
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1762	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:24:00 - [14] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 233	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:24:00 - [15] - Quote The delay actually bugs me to no end since its no longer truly semi auto, its just a slightly more powerful breach with a smaller clip size now
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:27:00 - [16] - Quote Delta 749 wrote: The delay actually bugs me to no end since its no longer truly semi auto, its just a slightly more powerful breach with a smaller clip size now Kid goes 23/2 in a 20 min game mode and thinks the guns still good, that's assuming he actually used only his gun for every kill
Delta 749 Kestrel Reconnaissance 234	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:28:00 - [17] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Delta 749 wrote: The delay actually bugs me to no end since its no longer truly semi auto, its just a slightly more powerful breach with a smaller clip size now Kid goes 23/2 in a 20 min game mode and thinks the guns still good, that's assuming he actually used only his gun for every kill Im betting he stole a lot of kills that match, its like the guy that hides behind the red line with a thales bragging about going 50/0 in a match
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:30:00 - [18] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528 They fixed it, so who's the dumb one?
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1762	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:33:00 - [19] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528 They fixed it, so who's the dumb one? Still you.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:36:00 - [20] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528 They fixed it, so who's the dumb one? Still you. I don't know what's worse, your abilities as a troll or your gaming.... If your going to attempt to troll me, at least be witty and creative, your neither....

The Black Art Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION 67	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:37:00 - [21] - Quote The RoF needs to upped to about 500, or at least 450. Why should I be punished because I have a "trigger finger"? Also, it's ridiculous that shooting above the RoF forces the gun to stutter. It should at least fire at it's maximum RoF, not punish me. It's not the end of world, but it's now a very situational gun.
TheReaper545 Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 6	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:39:00 - [22] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Or instead of dis-belief and possible "possible" qq pick the gun back up and actually attempt to use it I shouldn't have to prove the gun still works you have to prove it to yourself that the gun still works. What game mode simple question? Game mode was standard skirmish but then I played domination and still did just as good.
xprotoman23 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1880	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:42:00 - [23] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528 They fixed it, so who's the dumb one? ^^^ that actually was a bug.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:43:00 - [24] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. game mode? and video please... Or instead of dis-belief and possible "possible" qq pick the gun back up and actually attempt to use it I shouldn't have to prove the gun still works you have to prove it to yourself that the gun still works. What game mode simple question? Game mode was standard skirmish but then I played domination and still did just as good. Exactly my point, in a 20 min game mode you managed to average 1 kill per minute, Which is god awful no matter the end results And that's Assuming you used your gun for every kill and giving you the benefit of assuming you killed players at full health We can group up right now in a 50 clone ambush I bet you don't come close to 10 gun kills
Croned The Penguin Society 4	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:43:00 - [25] - Quote I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****.
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1762	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:43:00 - [26] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528 They fixed it, so who's the dumb one? Still you. I don't know what's worse, your abilities as a troll or your gaming.... If your going to attempt to troll me, at least be witty and creative, your neither....
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:45:00 - [27] - Quote Croned wrote: I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****. Group up, put up scores or STFU
Croned The Penguin Society 4	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:45:00 - [28] - Quote I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****.
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1762	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:46:00 - [29] - Quote xprotoman23 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: there are counters to everything but you guys are too dumb to figure it out. A tactical AR is not a valid counter to the tactical AR Speaking of dumb though... https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=59528 They fixed it, so who's the dumb one? ^^^ that actually was a bug. Was it? Because the recoil from hip-firing transferring over to ADS makes perfect sense to me.
Croned The Penguin Society 4	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:47:00 - [30] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****. Group up, put up scores or STFU Look who's raging.

EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 98	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:47:00 - [31] - Quote Oh yea for future reference a general rule of thumb for what's a good score for every respawn shooter: 1 kills per min Bad 2 kills per min decent 3 kills per min pretty good 4 kills per min good 5 kills per min beast mode
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 100	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:50:00 - [32] - Quote Croned wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****. Group up, put up scores or STFU Look who's raging. I'm cool and calm, text doesn't translate to emotion, especially when your talking to people who are irrelevant and teaching those who are clueless, I don't respect anyone's opinion on a message board especially those who are bad at the game. On top of being in a generation where everyone think that they are "LULZTROLLING"
Aqua-Regia Ahrendee Frontlinez 152	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:56:00 - [33] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth **. Group up, put up scores or STFU Look who's raging. I'm cool and calm, text doesn't translate to emotion, especially when your talking to people who are irrelevant and teaching those who are clueless, I don't respect anyone's opinion on a message board especially those who are bad at the game. On top of being in a generation where everyone think that they are "LULZTROLLING" RUUUN! EVEry DUSTOID! RUUUUN FASTER! EVEry DUSTOID! RUUUUUUUUUN**!
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1763	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:56:00 - [34] - Quote You sure QQ hard for a guy who.... Quote: can play any weapon in this game and still be the best, Hell I don't even need a gun and I'd still be better then the majority. Can we expect a MD video anytime soon?
Croned The Penguin Society 4	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:58:00 - [35] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****. Group up, put up scores or STFU Look who's raging. I'm cool and calm, text doesn't translate to emotion, especially when your talking to people who are irrelevant and teaching those who are clueless, I don't respect anyone's opinion on a message board especially those who are bad at the game. On top of being in a generation where everyone think that they are "LULZTROLLING" So you admit you're trolling? You don't respect anyone's opinion on a message board, and yet you feel the need to reply to a multiude of posts with irrelevant comments. Call it what you'd like.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 101	Posted - 2013.06.06 05:59:00 - [36] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: You sure QQ hard for a guy who.... Quote: can play any weapon in this game and still be the best, Hell I don't even need a gun and I'd still be better then the majority. Can we expect a MD video anytime soon? Quote: I don't respect anyone's opinion He thinks people care if he cares about their opinion MD and flux is easy, just have to get a proto variant...
Immortal Solder Alpha Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Universal Accord 5	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:01:00 - [37] - Quote Commander Tuna wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. Not here to argue about wether the nerf was successful but don't tell me that the tac ar is still good for cqc. Were they ever? I wouldn't know, cause that is what the SMG is for.
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1767	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:04:00 - [38] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: MD and flux is easy, just have to get a proto variant... I look forward to it. You might even get some nerf MD threads started
Immortal Solder Alpha Cyberdyne Systems and Technology The Universal Accord 5	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:07:00 - [39] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Croned wrote: I honestly thought this was a well-balanced nerf. It takes actual skill to aim now, and the smaller clip makes each shot more meaningful. Anyone who says it was nerfed too much obviously can't aim worth ****. Group up, put up scores or STFU Damn, you sound angry? Hostile even.
The Black Art Pro Hic Immortalis RISE of LEGION 67	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:09:00 - [40] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: MD and flux is easy, just have to get a proto variant... I look forward to it. You might even get some nerf MD threads started MD isn't THAT bad. On my alt I spec'd into them. Got the EXO, with flux nades, first game ever using MD went 15/3, no sidearm cause logi.

TheReaper545 Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 6	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:09:00 - [41] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Oh yea for future reference a general rule of thumb for what's a good score for every respawn shooter: 1 kills per min Bad 2 kills per min decent 3 kills per min pretty good 4 kills per min good 5 kills per min beast mode Until you redline them so hard they sit in the mountains and camp like little girls then your tac can't touch them. Your time proportions relate to ambush and ambush alone cause people can't hide in the red line in ambush
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 101	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:27:00 - [42] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Oh yea for future reference a general rule of thumb for what's a good score for every respawn shooter: 1 kills per min Bad 2 kills per min decent 3 kills per min pretty good 4 kills per min good 5 kills per min beast mode Until you redline them so hard they sit in the mountains and camp like little girls then your tac can't touch them. Your time proportions relate to ambush and ambush alone cause people can't hide in the red line in ambush open spot in my sqd, i'll add you, you break 10 kills with it
Zatara Rought TeamPlayers EoN. 166	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:48:00 - [43] - Quote I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 101	Posted - 2013.06.06 06:59:00 - [44] - Quote Zatara Rought wrote: I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average. 25 kills in 6 min, half the kill count, someone is bad at math
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1767	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:01:00 - [45] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average. 25 kills in 6 min, half the kill count, someone is bad at math lol, you counting that OB? 9 kills from OB puts you at 16, 16 puts you at slightly above decent
DJINN leukoplast Hellstorm Inc League of Infamy 515	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:13:00 - [46] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. This is good, it means CCP didn't nerf it into oblivion. A few more small adjustments, and it should be just right.
Zatara Rought TeamPlayers EoN. 166	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:13:00 - [47] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average. 25 kills in 6 min, half the kill count, someone is bad at math Oh I must have read wrong when you said gun kills. Not proto nades, re's, and a 9 (was it 9 sloth?) OB.
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 101	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:14:00 - [48] - Quote DJINN leukoplast wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. This is good, it means CCP didn't nerf it into oblivion. A few more small adjustments, and it should be just right. Reaper has been added as a friend but has yet to get in a squad and duplicate results
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 101	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:18:00 - [49] - Quote Zatara Rought wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average. 25 kills in 6 min, half the kill count, someone is bad at math Oh I must have read wrong when you said gun kills. Not proto nades, re's, and a 9 (was it 9 sloth?) OB. Kills per min not gun kills per min
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1769	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:20:00 - [50] - Quote Zatara Rought wrote: (was it 9 sloth?) OB. Aye, counted them 1 by 1 off the kill feed.

Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1769	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:22:00 - [51] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average. 25 kills in 6 min, half the kill count, someone is bad at math Oh I must have read wrong when you said gun kills. Not proto nades, re's, and a 9 (was it 9 sloth?) OB. Kills per min not gun kills per min Do it without a squad, or at least when you're not squad leader
Zatara Rought TeamPlayers EoN. 166	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:22:00 - [52] - Quote I double edited my other post but was 2 lazy to make sure it got visibility. Edit: NEADS MOAR VILISBULLITY!
EVEry DUSTOID United Planetary Soldiers 101	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:26:00 - [53] - Quote Sloth9230 wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: EVEry DUSTOID wrote: Zatara Rought wrote: I think diggy, even on one his best matches...barely got 10...atleast maybe he did. Just barely...not bad considering the title is "Modded trigger finger" Our evidence But if his scale is 5 a minute...then he's average. 25 kills in 6 min, half the kill count, someone is bad at math Oh I must have read wrong when you said gun kills. Not proto nades, re's, and a 9 (was it 9 sloth?) OB. Kills per min not gun kills per min Do it without a squad, or at least when you're not squad leader I have clips of me killing 10+ people in less then 60 seconds in my montage, What do i care?
Sloth9230 Reaper Galactic ROFL BROS 1769	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:29:00 - [54] - Quote EVEry DUSTOID wrote: I have clips of me killing 10+ people in less then 60 seconds in my montage, What do i care? Clearly you do if you feel the need to record your l33tness and post it on Youtube
Commander Tuna KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 55	Posted - 2013.06.06 07:59:00 - [55] - Quote Immortal Solder Alpha wrote: Commander Tuna wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. Not here to argue about wether the nerf was successful but don't tell me that the tac ar is still good for cqc. Were they ever? I wouldn't know, cause that is what the SMG is for. Unfortunately they were beastly for cqc with their near perfect hipfire accuracy. Also unfortunately ccp went overboard and made their hipfire accuracy only slightly better then a sniper rifle!
Bullets2yaface Red Star. EoN. 11	Posted - 2013.06.06 13:38:00 - [56] - Quote 400RPM what kind of **** ** is that CCP it cant even keep up with how fast i hit the controller you should be ashamed of such an extreme drop and hey lets drop 6 rounds from a clip that'll make a HUGE difference. God you guys dont know how to nerf something worth a god damn get a clue just because people are crybabies doesn't mean you have to give in to what they want. When you suck you find something to whine about no matter what. You gonna nerf my flaylocks cuz people are too stupid to jump around a little more? Gonna nerf Caldari logi cuz of the whining? Whats the point of destroying every weapon and every suit. Assault suits suck besides Caldari but did i cry no I SWITCHED TO CALDARI everything has an answer if you dont wana be killed by a tac rifle from range guess what use the tac rifle.
Omen Astrul Holdfast Syndicate Amarr Empire 5	Posted - 2013.06.06 13:50:00 - [57] - Quote Well I just went 18/2 using a basic assault rifle. Must be op. Tbh, that's the extent of the logic in this thread. TAR seems to be nerfed adequately imo. Clip size limits you to about 1 kill per clipGÇö2 if they're running in straight lines and you're placing your shots. Still effective at range but worse than regular AR at CQC. Seems about right.
Bullets2yaface Red Star. EoN. 11	Posted - 2013.06.06 14:18:00 - [58] - Quote Omen Astrul wrote: Well I just went 18/2 using a basic assault rifle. Must be op. Tbh, that's the extent of the logic in this thread. TAR seems to be nerfed adequately imo. Clip size limits you to about 1 kill per clipGÇö2 if they're running in straight lines and you're placing your shots. Still effective at range but worse than regular AR at CQC. Seems about right. Yep you better watch out or THEY'LL NERF YOU
Full Metal Kitten Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation 708	Posted - 2013.06.06 14:53:00 - [59] - Quote If it was any other weapon TheMatkOfShame would be laughing and trolling the standard "get gud scrub". We know you are a good FPS player. I respect what you can get done in a match, but if you're so good why all the tears? You are better known for using logi as a slayer with REs than the TAC anyway. You are basically complaining that in a 16 man squad you can no longer grab more than 50% of the kills for yourself. Boo hoo. I sure hope things get better for you, man. Nobody likes to see an elite slayer reduced to a pool of salty tears crying for a respec. I'll go ahead and submit a petition for you.
Zauis Gallente Net Warriors Z 4	Posted - 2013.06.06 15:02:00 - [60] - Quote It was supposed to be overpowered, it should be overpowered for that much SP spent on them...

TheReaper545 Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 6	Posted - 2013.06.06 15:31:00 - [61] - Quote Commander Tuna wrote: Immortal Solder Alpha wrote: Commander Tuna wrote: TheReaper545 wrote: The only thing that got changed is the clip size and that delay in between shots. Hip fire is still pretty good and the gun is still pretty nice in CQC. Just went 23/2 with the Codewish Tac Duvolle. All in all I think the Tac is better because with that delay instead of just spamming the trigger I now take time and aim and kill the target in half the time. Not here to argue about wether the nerf was successful but don't tell me that the tac ar is still good for cqc. Were they ever? I wouldn't know, cause that is what the SMG is for. Unfortunately they were beastly for cqc with their near perfect hipfire accuracy. Also unfortunately ccp went overboard and made their hipfire accuracy only slightly better then a sniper rifle! I wouldn't say slightly better than a sniper. It has much better hipfire then that in its current state. EVEry DUSTOID wrote: -snip- You must hang out on the Dust514 facebook's most active group page to much with all this e-peen swinging.
TheReaper545 Onslaught Inc RISE of LEGION 6	Posted - 2013.06.06 15:36:00 - [62] - Quote I just realized Every Dustoid is the author of the Tac is dead thread he must def be a butt hurt little boy that his crutch got steam rolled and it actually takes real skill to use it now.
martinofski Les Rebelles A Qc 170	Posted - 2013.06.06 15:48:00 - [63] - Quote TheReaper545 wrote: I just realized Every Dustoid is the author of the Tac is dead thread he must def be a butt hurt little boy that his crutch got steam rolled and it actually takes real skill to use it now. Totally agree with this. Not like we didn't know a week after the release that this gun was problematic.


Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.