I've posted in all those threads. Also I can't make a list in feedback forum, So General discussion will have to do.

If you get too patient and friendly with CCP they'll get lax and blow it off for the next 6 months. The revive/nanite injector issue should of been a week one patch, just to prove my point.

You gotta be firm and show them you mean business, serious business. I know some of you don't agree but that's ok. That's why I'm here to do and say the things that others will not.

That's why I'm here to do and say the things that others will not.

You're acting as if this is the first time someone made a "Fix this or I leave" thread.

You don't have to thank me.

Kindly leave your stuff in my quarters on the way out.

some of this may take more than a hotfix to deploy... best of luck though and add dropship WP to the list!

So in other words your saying you have no faith in CCP to actually fix these issues? Thank you for emphasizing my point.

You made another "do what I say or else" thread. I'll repeat myself - Kindly leave your stuff in my quarters on the way out.

Also, to assume I have no faith in CCP is absolutely wrong. I've been playing Eve for the past two and a half years (you're probably an '04 character upon reading that) and have been nothing but impressed with their dedication to the fanbase.

Hello, Thank you for ..

Flaylock splash is fine. It's nearly nonexistent as it is.

Then you my friend, is what's wrong here. Continue to accept 3-6 month to a year wait times for fixes with critical issues in the game. Continue to give them your cash from your wallet despite the fact they would rather put out shiny AUR items sooner than polishing a broken product first.

Continue to give CCP a pat on the back for getting EVE to a playable state after 4 years. I gather you would do the same again for Dust 7 years down the line when we no longer have to worry about our framerate dropping with the PS5.

Tbh, I've been trying to decide whether or not to grab myself a vet pack over the past few days. Gonna go ahead and grab it.

And I will continue to happily accept long wait times for issues. If we were to rush things like you want the developers to do, we'd most likely introduce more bugs than we were fixing. This isn't Activision or EA that only cares about spitting out garbage every year. These guys actually listen to us, despite what you may think. I mean, how many people lost their jobs when CCP started talking about Aurum ships? They watch the community, take our reactions into account, listen to feedback, and deliver. Granted, that timeframe might not cater to CoD fanbois, but it gets done.

Also, didn't Eve celebrate its 10th anniversary not too long ago? Just sayin' that bad companies don't last that long.

It also appears that I have rustled your jimmies, good sir. I apologize for that.

Flaylock is fine. Why nerf an already niche weapon?

Squad leaders backing everyone out of deployment I find to be really nice and I'm glad they added it. Why do people have a problem with that feature?

Confirmed CCP Fanboy.

I think your confused, that feature isn't in the game. currently if the squad is waiting for deployment and the squad leader cancels his deployment, the rest of the squad remains waiting in deployment.

OP Is asking for Squad leader to Cancel deployment automatically for all those in squad.

You must not have your flaylock operation and proficiency up. Flaylock definitely has to much damage and radius for a sidearm pistol that's based on the Mass Driver which comes up short to the flaylock in just about every way.

You can add what - 25% radius - that is what you are complaining about - its still less than a grenade and it is easily avoided if enemy jumps.

If anything the MD and Plasma Cannon need to be properly buffed to make AR users think twice about where and when to engag

OP has hit every issue on the head with a sledgehammer, well played sir