If Activision, EA, and Valve were paying this guy to blatantly leave a big steaming pile on the game he could have at least talked about the real problems instead of making stuff up.

-Horrible hit detection and server latency.
-Unplayable levels of lag on complex maps and different server hosts.
-Flawed terrain rendering that causes invisible walls.
-Imbalanced weapons.
-Constant nerfings to niche playstyles while priority is given to generic ones.
-Lack of matchmaking and tutorials for new players.
-Seemingly pointless interaction with EVE Online, even in PC and especially FW.

See that? I just listed several things that could have been covered to warrant such a bad score but I used actual facts. You don't need to lie about Dust 514's problems when there are so many that are as subtle as a kick to the groin.

He was doing work with the SP and HMG which actually do work so his aim isn't that shotty. But my point is that you can tell he simply played for ~5 battles in the academy and went on to almost completely bash the game with the bias of a greased palm. MMOHUT spends more time reviewing games than this guy did reviewing the game. Nothing about vehicles, the different suit classes, weapon types, or anything about the squad dynamic. Quite frankly, I'm disappointed because he was aiming for half ass but wound up with 1/16th. The only thing he did get right were the tutorials and the lack of EVE involvement.

I expected it to be bad, but dayum, 4.4. Dust gets a solid 6 in my book as a shooter, and 9-10 for potential. Nevertheless, their main criticisms were perfectly valid, although there were some plain mistakes in the review.

I've been warning about the poor gunplay for months, and have said several times the game was released too early. It is a closed beta quality product now, and should have not been given out to the masses, yet. CCP can only blame themselves.