The main point I was trying to make is that the infantry have little feedback from the officers as to their performance. Also, there is no currently accepted channel available for the infantry to provide feedback to the officers as to the officer performance. I suggested a post-match "debriefing" where it was possible for both the officers and the infantry to kind of "exchange notes", but this was ignored.

Personally, I think that improved communication between officers and infantry can only be of benefit to the corp as a whole. We all have lives outside the game and many of the skills that we have acquired over the course of our lives can be of benefit to the corp. The benefits of these skills can only be leveraged through communication.

Let me provide a brief example... PC.

I'm pretty sure that none of us expected to maintain our foothold for long, but thanks to the swiftness in the actions of peg and star, we acquired a region straight away. We fought well for that region and eventually lost it. I don't see this as a loss, I see this as a victory in both experience and knowledge. In the first battle we were outnumbered, outgunned, out-skilled and out-trained, but we still managed to hold an objective to the end. The second battle was less successful, but we put up a good fight and avoided a redline.

The officers had a post-match "debriefing" after each of these battles (apparently) and made decisions based on our performance, however nothing of the results of these discussions was passed on to the infantry. We fought for the corp mostly expecting to lose, but with the possibility of success motivating us to fight on. We didn't expect hugs, kisses, cute toys and conciliatory notes when we lost, but we didn't expect to be ignored either.

Even if the loss can be mostly attributed to "they had better gear than us", this is a poor summary of the battle. We did many things right that would have gone better if we had better gear, we did things wrong that would still have resulted in a lack of success if we had better gear. "They had better gear than us" is true, but is a cop-out. "They got to the compound before us" is true, but when they did we were in complete disarray and had no fallback position.

Star has said that "too much information confuses them". This is completely insulting to people who manage far more information than a basic battle plan with a couple of contingencies on a daily basis as a part of their professional careers. It is a poor reason for not properly formulating a battle plan. If you do have a properly formulated plan then tell us. If you want us to "trust the officers" then show us that they are trustworthy.

I don't think I'm alone in wanting more than "Trust The Officers" as a response when I ask what can be done to improve the corp's performance. We are a team... All of us. I would like it if the officers could acknowledge this.

But back to my original point...

Communication is important. From the officers to the infantry, but also from the infantry to the officers. The infantry have a lot to give, in addition to our time and our suits. Feedback (both ways) following a momentous battle would be beneficial to both the infantry and the officers (not to mention the corp as a whole through providing a community spirit).

One possible way of achieving this is a "debriefing", which I visualize as an informal after-match discussion between the whole team. The infantry can give feedback on officer de

So... why did you post this and why do you think anyone would care about a 15 man corp? o . 0

So... why did you post this and why do you think anyone would care about a 15 man corp? o . 0

But regardless sounds like some tough times, least the infantry understand communication is important - always a good first step lol

Wait.

You gave money to a group called T-SCAM?

Wait.

You gave money to a group called T-SCAM?

Wait.

You gave money to a group called T-SCAM?

+1 qft

I posted it in the hope that their current "recruitment drive" doesn't waste any other player's time. Also in the hope that the current members wake up to the situation that they are in.

This corp actually changed the name of their public channel after kicking me so I couldn't talk to anyone directly. LOL

My thoughts were such a threat to them that they took more drastic action after kicking me than they did when they were robbed.

And the second point... Yeah, the infantry knows communication is important, but the officers don't have a clue.

What the op does not tell you that every member wanted him out

He never shuts up and always thought he knew better then everyone else no one wanted to squad up with him just because he acts like a 12 year old girl and he never listened to orders either and wondered why he died.

And yea i m not the best at this fps game and never claimed to be so no idea why he named me in his 1st post and corpse get your fact right i do a lot on the field with my dropship but your dieing to much to even c what is killing you.

And as for the money we asked for donates we never made you give money over and it went in to pc which you were in both battles.

And do you think i tell my fleets in eve what the plan is no cause they dont need to they trust me cause 9 of 10 time we get results for all i know we have a spy so why would i give my hand a way before i need to

Learn how new edan works fool

The op is mad he got kicked and that no one wanted to play with him and thought he would come here and try to make us look bad but whatever every corp has one of these guys i m sure but please dont take my word for it ask anyone in the corp.