They weren't ment to be fast in the first place. Caldari vehicles are ment to be long range support, not the charging bulls, which is Gallente. Know your facts.


Peace, Godin

They weren't ment to be fast in the first place. Caldari vehicles are ment to be long range support, not the charging bulls, which is Gallente. Know your facts.


Peace, Godin

then give all caldari a range buff. we do not have a range buff so this is just a lie to keep the shield HAVs down.

You have a missile range buff instead of blaster, and missiles go further than blasters. Bingo, done. Your tanks also have better CPU which makes fitting railguns easier on them, so there's even more range.

Also shields regenerate naturally while armor does not. And you have way more High Slots for your defense, so you can invest in damage mods in your low slots.

Chassis, idk. I agree that they should be back. Anyways, Gallente is always faster than Caldari, because they fit stronger thrusters on their ****. It takes us slightly longer to accelerate, but we will hit a higher top speed This is because we use blasters, which has the shortest range of any other turret type. That means we need to get in close, which is why we use stronger thrusters. Caldari uses missiles and rails, and snipes targets. Therefore, they don't need speed. They just sit and snipe. Therefore, all of you are doing it wrong.


Peace, Godin

You have a missile range buff instead of blaster, and missiles go further than blasters. Bingo, done. Your tanks also have better CPU which makes fitting railguns easier on them, so there's even more range.

Also shields regenerate naturally while armor does not. And you have way more High Slots for your defense, so you can invest in damage mods in your low slots.

By speed, I was referring to both top speed and acceleration (top speed would be solved if chassis hadn't been removed). And ,as well, by your logic, caldari should have the advantage in a rail battle, due to mobility/faster acceleration (i.e. caldari should be able to relocate and set up in a sniping position very easily) unfortunatly this is not the case because the caldari seem to have suffered some kind of reduction to acceleration since uprising. I used to run a Jovian but now not even that helps (it doesn't even fell like it is doing anything at all now).

Yor acceleration is the same, your speed got nerfed (or rather switched). With 3 hardners, a extender, and regenerator, and dual damage mods on a Gunnlogi should do wonders. You will be able to survive OB's and dish out enough damage to make other HAV's fear you.


Peace, Godin

People need to learn how to friken read. How the hell is armor supposed to be faster than shields? (simple answer is that it should not be because of armor penalty). Were shield tanks faster in chromosom? Is it fair to game balance that shield tanks are so much weaker than armor tank yet do not make up for it in another aspect (such as speed).

Why don't you think a little bit about what others are saying before you go around just trying to talk down to people dip****.

People need to learn how to friken read. How the hell is armor supposed to be faster than shields? (simple answer is that it should not be because of armor penalty). Were shield tanks faster in chromosom? Is it fair to game balance that shield tanks are so much weaker than armor tank yet do not make up for it in another aspect (such as speed).

Why don't you think a little bit about what others are saying before you go around just trying to talk down to people dip****.

even in the last build swarms did more damage to armor than shields

1. You can easily equip I a rail turret to an armor tank and still make it far more survivable than a shield tank. I am full proto tanks and have been in such battles

2. If you can do this with an armor tank missiles are going to do you little good in a distance battle, since missiles have flight time.

3. The original question I posed was: has the speed on shield tanks been reduced in uprising and if so why? Because it sure does feel like speed has been reduced. And why do we not have chassis? No one has as of yet adressed this.