They're so kind like that aren't they

It's not quite secure yet.

Check out this helpful post about Enjin security!

You guys are adorable.

already did and improved upon

Cool, I just posted on your shoutbox, though. Tidy that up a little.
Probably shouldn't have given me the tag names or detailed the permissions changes, either. "SECURITY CLEARED" would have taken a bit of guesswork to give myself those permissions.

now lets find mith ip

This will be retracted or personal details are fair game.

This is your only warning to acknowledge the distinction between RL and the game.

so still unsecure huh? i must say enjin sux security balls.

Btw that was a test.
I don't know if you know IP ban doesnt work for unregister users

It was a poor test but the threat was clear. I can promise you that's not a line you want to cross or even get close to because I will escalate like a proper sociopath.

let's stick with ingame. stuff

ok how about now. hows yyour opinion on forum? worst than enjin?

It's still Enjin.

All of your members need to hide their posts, because I can still go here and read each poster's posts individually to reconstruct the conversations. The thread I linked explains how to do that.

ok i just check with a new login it seems to show other ppl post's on there enjin. it also show me my error code when trying to connect to fsc site without permission. is there a way i could block member list i read your guide and it doesn't say anything

ok ty. +1 for being help. And if i were to guess your a computer tech?

Might as well acknowledge it here, seeing as other players already know. Former pen-tester, now in counter-fraud.

You two are adorable. Now kiss.

This will be retracted or personal details are fair game.

This is your only warning to acknowledge the distinction between RL and the game.

Your threat of revealing personal details is unnecessary and runs contrary to that idea, however.

My IP address is part of my personal details. It contains information about my real life. Not easily usable information, admittedly, but personally identifying information all the same. The threat was made on FSC's side first, to track down my IP. I explained that this was unacceptable and demanded that the threat be retracted lest I escalate to the same level in the interests of fairness.

Suggesting that I just outright threatened to reveal personal information is a result of your being either misinformed or disingenuous. I'm going to give the benefit of the doubt and assume the former.

Might as well acknowledge it here, seeing as other players already know. Former pen-tester, now in counter-fraud.

In what, Bacon? Or Tears?