| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
xxMemphis
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
16
   |
Posted - 2013.05.11 22:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
First, I understand blowing them for tactical reasons...
I do not understand why you should get +100 for blowing it up when it was not "owned". All this does is cause either a rush to the turrets so you can hack them and blow up the other, tankers to drive around blowing them up instead of fighting, or forge gunners to spend time killing them. I agree with getting points for destroying an enemy installation....I do not agree with 100 points for destroying something that does nothing.
|
Cinnamon267
The Southern Legion
RISE of LEGION
42
|
Posted - 2013.05.11 23:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
Indeed. If you're just point whoring it makes more sense to get an easy 100 so no one else can. And, it makes it easier to attack said position since there won't be a turret. Needs to be rethought.
If it is own and it is destroyed you get 100. If it isn't own... say 25? Maybe. |
The dark cloud
Seraphim Initiative.
CRONOS.
1399
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 00:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
screw that i keep my free 100WP and you can watch how it blows up while attempting to hack it. Only a destroyed installation is a good installation. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
326
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 00:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
And then they don't blow it up, and then then enemy hacks it... nice job. |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
145
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 00:57:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yeah I dunno about that. You do know they buffed the installations for Uprising right? Unmanned blasters acquire infantry easier and at much longer distances than they used to. |
NeoWraith Acedia
Fraternity of St. Venefice
Amarr Empire
329
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 01:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
RECON BY FIRE wrote:Yeah I dunno about that. You do know they buffed the installations for Uprising right? Unmanned blasters acquire infantry easier and at much longer distances than they used to.
Edit: It would also be exploitable. Someone would man it until it is almost dead and then hop out to deny the enemy WPs. A smart gunner does this already, but that simply makes it too exploitable.
Unowned, like when they're still yellow. |
Xender17
Oblivion S.G.X
61
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 01:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
I got 650 points in the first 45 secs of match |
RECON BY FIRE
Internal Error.
Negative-Feedback
145
|
Posted - 2013.05.12 01:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
NeoWraith Acedia wrote:RECON BY FIRE wrote:Yeah I dunno about that. You do know they buffed the installations for Uprising right? Unmanned blasters acquire infantry easier and at much longer distances than they used to.
Edit: It would also be exploitable. Someone would man it until it is almost dead and then hop out to deny the enemy WPs. A smart gunner does this already, but that simply makes it too exploitable. Unowned, like when they're still yellow.
Ohhhhh, I definitely misunderstood that. Still though, I don't think it should lose ALL WPs. Im still not convinced it should lose any WPs. Like someone else mentioned it reduces the want to blow them up so that a red can hack it and start tearing your team up with it. The best players will likely blow them up anyway, I just don't see this being a very good change. I feel a more important, and related, change to this is the way WPs are earned in vehicles. The vehicle kill assists accrued for passengers in vehicles is a bit ridiculous. I can understand the pilot of the vehicle getting them if a passenger gets a kill, but passengers because of the drivers kills? Wtf? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |