|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
722
   |
Posted - 2013.05.04 23:48:00 -
[1] - Quote
As a heavy, I will tell you that I fear Assault Rifles and Mass Drivers more than another Heavy. Also, I end up being the one suppressed rather than the suppressor...
Simply put, AR > HMG with these changes and the lack of mobility overshadows the barely 100 HP buff to the Suit we got. (Base eHP for Type I heavy I believe is 700-750? Am i correct?) |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 00:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Also double post but you seem to favor lacing your posts with higher vocabulary and uncommon theories and concepts in order to establish your own validity? Sorry, I don't really want to know why you consider yourself so credible.
Just tell me your opinions, try and back it up with facts, and if you must explain a relevant concept but don't rattle off a list of how you imply you somehow are more educated. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 00:07:00 -
[3] - Quote
Logi Bro wrote:I'm pretty sure we aren't getting those no movement penalty armor plates this build, I would love a link if you have confirmed we will though.
I don't think we are, perhaps I worded my response wierdly, I was saying that our continued lack of mobility and low eHP, combined with the nerf to range AND DAMAGE on top of the removal of HMG sharpshooter makes us a sitting duck for other weapons especially when Assault users can out manuever and out DPS us at range, it just is really a huge slap to heavies no matter how you look at it. |
J'Jor Da'Wg
KILL-EM-QUICK
RISE of LEGION
722
|
Posted - 2013.05.05 00:13:00 -
[4] - Quote
Keyser Soze VerbalKint wrote:J'Jor Da'Wg wrote:Also double post but you seem to favor lacing your posts with higher vocabulary and uncommon theories and concepts in order to establish your own validity? Sorry, I don't really want to know why you consider yourself so credible.
Just tell me your opinions, try and back it up with facts, and if you must explain a relevant concept but don't rattle off a list of how you imply you somehow are more educated. Dafuq? Gave you facts, gave you also insights into where common mistakes in opposition arguments exist. I don't lorde my education over anyone but when i speak i factor in that not everyone reading it understands the logic that leads to my conclusions. It reduced confusion and needless back and forth. Its actually a workflow of stepwise logic. Since facts are meaningless if not put into context.
I don't think you were intentionally doing that, and you did put various stats, but your one post in particular mentioned a bunch of concepts that might have had somethin to do with the argument but had no explanation of them or how they specifically relate.. So they were in "context" but lacked an implication and/or explanation of what that even meant.
Please dont take my comment as an insult I was merely saying how it might come off as intellectual condescending to other people.
Bah, we are gettig off topic here. Forget it. |
|
|
| |
|