| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lynn Beck
Forsaken Legion-0
9
   |
Posted - 2013.04.22 16:41:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sounds a bit weird. but i've seen so many matches where one team demolishes the other. It would be a nice idea to have a game mode where you have 3 teams fighting over 5 objectives:
SO. If team 1 has all 5 objectives, then they now have to fight against 2 other teams. On the other hand though. If one team starts pounding a single other team, then the 3rd team notices that and goes for them to "knock them out" of the match, would be an interesting battle.
Remember htough, in real combat not all battles are 2 sided. |
0 Try Harder
Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz
Noir. Mercenary Group
266
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 18:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
I love your idea. Three team skirmish would be fun. |
ladwar
Dead Six Initiative
195
|
Posted - 2013.04.22 18:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
... maybe |
Lynn Beck
Forsaken Legion-0
15
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 13:25:00 -
[4] - Quote
Bump? 3 team matches to help "alleviate" no matter how slightly, the level of "other team has all 5 objectives, let's snipe" mentality that blueberries have. |
Iskandar Zul Karnain
Hellstorm Inc
League of Infamy
354
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 14:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Seriously?
No one thought of this sooner?
I love this idea. |
I-Shayz-I
ZionTCD
Unclaimed.
220
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
The problem is which MCC is shooting at which?
It also doesn't make sense to do this when most battles are only from two sides.
You know what the problem is with skirmish?
Well imagine the 4 point map we have now, and imagine if instead of bases on either side, we had bases at diagonals, with spawn points on each side of the square.
This would mean that side A doesn't have to always go for A and B first, and side B doesn't have to go for C and D first.
In other words, you'd have more of a choice of directions to go, with only one objective closest to you.
Also, why do we have CRU's right next to bases? They should be in between objectives like in that 5 point map with the CRU in between C and B. |
Lynn Beck
Forsaken Legion-0
30
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:24:00 -
[7] - Quote
Simple: Add another turret on each, or give that decision to the Commander. For null cannons: first person that initiates the hack and completes all the way through gets a Left Dpad/Right Dpad prompt. Like star wars: Battlefront 2 when you get the hero.
Up: pass it up to someone else
Left:Yes
Right:No, hold on to it for later.
How this could apply to 3 team Skirmish: Up: Let someone else handle it. Right: Attack Gallente MCC(let's say Red.) Left: Attack Minmatar MCC(Let's say Purple) Also, full functionality to firing, jump, weapon switch, grenades. and all usual stuff is retained, as to not murder the player. |
Xender17
Oblivion S.G.X
46
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
+1 also if one team runs out of clones they should stay in the battle until they are killed off. What about a ghost player for when there are no clones left? |
General Regret
PSU GHOST SYNDICATE
0
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 22:33:00 -
[9] - Quote
Could see this happening, more fighting more competitive more tactical especially in skirmish. Niceee |
Forlorn Destrier
ZionTCD
Unclaimed.
962
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 22:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
Lynn Beck wrote:Sounds a bit weird. but i've seen so many matches where one team demolishes the other. It would be a nice idea to have a game mode where you have 3 teams fighting over 5 objectives:
SO. If team 1 has all 5 objectives, then they now have to fight against 2 other teams. On the other hand though. If one team starts pounding a single other team, then the 3rd team notices that and goes for them to "knock them out" of the match, would be an interesting battle.
Remember htough, in real combat not all battles are 2 sided.
+1 OP
Great idea. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 :: [one page] |