Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc
256
|
Posted - 2013.04.19 12:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
I've been perusing these forums for awhile and itGÇÖs obvious that threads typically come in "waves". I find this interesting that Tuesday may be Nerf Heavies, Heavies OP, Heavies UP day. Then the next day is Push to talk or something else and Today seems to be frame rates suck day.
What do you think causes this wave effect of related post coming in at the same time. Does everyone have alts they are logging in to start new threads they already started? Do people see one thread and decide they are so prima donna they need to be heard and start a new thread?
Would it be more useful if we had a GÇ£topicsGÇ¥ sub-forum where issues that have enough votes get to have a thread placed where no duplicate threads can be placed?
|
Mithridates VI
DUST 411
856
|
Posted - 2013.04.19 12:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote: I've been perusing these forums for awhile and itGÇÖs obvious that threads typically come in "waves". I find this interesting that Tuesday may be Nerf Heavies, Heavies OP, Heavies UP day. Then the next day is Push to talk or something else and Today seems to be frame rates suck day.
What do you think causes this wave effect of related post coming in at the same time. Does everyone have alts they are logging in to start new threads they already started? Do people see one thread and decide they are so prima donna they need to be heard and start a new thread?
Would it be more useful if we had a GÇ£topicsGÇ¥ sub-forum where issues that have enough votes get to have a thread placed where no duplicate threads can be placed?
Most online communities experience "waves" similar to those you are describing. These forums seem to have a really short lifecycle when it comes to that sort of thing, recycling material and in general being a pretty volatile bunch collectively.
Some of it can be attributed to new threads instead of replies to old threads, either because the poster thinks their opinion warrants a pedestal of its own or because they have genuinely forgotten that the thread inspired the thought they've been having and think they are starting a new conversation. Some of it is the hivemind that communities get when they are all exposed to the same stimuli and environment.
I don't know whether a topic subforum would work. It's similar to having a massive FAQ but without forum moderation involving deletions/mergers instead of purely locks, we would just end up with a dozen threads in which people had commented "CHECK THE GODDAMN TOPICS FORUM HOW HARD IS THAT?" |
Aeon Amadi
WarRavens
1164
|
Posted - 2013.04.19 12:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote:Daedric Lothar wrote: I've been perusing these forums for awhile and itGÇÖs obvious that threads typically come in "waves". I find this interesting that Tuesday may be Nerf Heavies, Heavies OP, Heavies UP day. Then the next day is Push to talk or something else and Today seems to be frame rates suck day.
What do you think causes this wave effect of related post coming in at the same time. Does everyone have alts they are logging in to start new threads they already started? Do people see one thread and decide they are so prima donna they need to be heard and start a new thread?
Would it be more useful if we had a GÇ£topicsGÇ¥ sub-forum where issues that have enough votes get to have a thread placed where no duplicate threads can be placed?
Most online communities experience "waves" similar to those you are describing. These forums seem to have a really short lifecycle when it comes to that sort of thing, recycling material and in general being a pretty volatile bunch collectively. Some of it can be attributed to new threads instead of replies to old threads, either because the poster thinks their opinion warrants a pedestal of its own or because they have genuinely forgotten that the thread inspired the thought they've been having and think they are starting a new conversation. Some of it is the hivemind that communities get when they are all exposed to the same stimuli and environment. I don't know whether a topic subforum would work. It's similar to having a massive FAQ but without forum moderation involving deletions/mergers instead of purely locks, we would just end up with a dozen threads in which people had commented "CHECK THE GODDAMN TOPICS FORUM HOW HARD IS THAT?"
They're pretty quick with it too. If you're five minutes late on new information, they'll nail you to a cross and hang you by your neck from the nearest cliff just so that you are positively, 100% sure that the information posted was five minutes later than someone else who posted it - even if you bring something new to the table that the other guy didn't mention.
http://www.troll.me/images/willy-wonka-gene-wilder/so-im-conceited-huh-once-you.jpg |
Daedric Lothar
Onslaught Inc
257
|
Posted - 2013.04.19 12:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mithridates VI wrote: I don't know whether a topic subforum would work. It's similar to having a massive FAQ but without forum moderation involving deletions/mergers instead of purely locks, we would just end up with a dozen threads in which people had commented "CHECK THE GODDAMN TOPICS FORUM HOW HARD IS THAT?"
With the idea I meant about saving CCP time and effort having to read every thread. They would just look at the ones that got good enough votes and they could have a policy where they "will" comment directly about their ideas if a thread obtains enough votes and that we can track which issues are trending and it will give a clearer roadmap to the future picture.
|
Planetside2Bomberr
Chatelain Rapid Response Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 05:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote:Mithridates VI wrote: I don't know whether a topic subforum would work. It's similar to having a massive FAQ but without forum moderation involving deletions/mergers instead of purely locks, we would just end up with a dozen threads in which people had commented "CHECK THE GODDAMN TOPICS FORUM HOW HARD IS THAT?" With the idea I meant about saving CCP time and effort having to read every thread. They would just look at the ones that got good enough votes and they could have a policy where they "will" comment directly about their ideas if a thread obtains enough votes and that we can track which issues are trending and it will give a clearer roadmap to the future picture. Be your own Judge. What game looks like more fun to you? Dust.........Or these other F2P games coming this year.........
Planetside 2 (19 GOTY Awards)
Coming to PS4 this year...
|
calisk galern
BurgezzE.T.F
533
|
Posted - 2013.07.13 05:59:00 -
[6] - Quote
Daedric Lothar wrote: I've been perusing these forums for awhile and itGÇÖs obvious that threads typically come in "waves". I find this interesting that Tuesday may be Nerf Heavies, Heavies OP, Heavies UP day. Then the next day is Push to talk or something else and Today seems to be frame rates suck day.
What do you think causes this wave effect of related post coming in at the same time. Does everyone have alts they are logging in to start new threads they already started? Do people see one thread and decide they are so prima donna they need to be heard and start a new thread?
Would it be more useful if we had a GÇ£topicsGÇ¥ sub-forum where issues that have enough votes get to have a thread placed where no duplicate threads can be placed?
organized whiners.
they sit in a shadowy backroom chat, hosted by the imperfects and discuss what to whine about and get nerfed tommorrow.
that's simple to figure out, what's truly confusing is what the guy above me gets out of posting that crap repeatedly every week.
even if he has it programmed as a spam bot, the effort required to make that spam bot seems like it would even be too much, if he does it by hand that's a ******* full time job, he should be sterlized as stupidity of that level should not be permitted to reproduce.
I sure hope he's at least getting paid by some PS reps, as stupid and unlikely as that is, it's the only thing that would ever make me show that form of dedication to not playing a game. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |