DUST Search

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

LAVS

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 99	Posted - 2013.04.09 22:20:00 - [1] - Quote LAVS need a buff I recommend making the LAV a 4 seat heavy armored vehicle instead of having a gunner on the back the passenger next to the driver seat would control a gun on top of the vehicle via remote. LAV would have tops and sides to protect the driver from incoming AV weapons. If not redesigning the LAV then make this another kind of fast light ground vehicle. LAVS are pointless and the gunners get shot down to fast they need some form of protection. sorta like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Saudi_Arabian_Humvee.jpg but the passenger next to the driver seat controls the gun. Style of the humvee would of course be more dust and faction style.
Rowdy Railgunner Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 14	Posted - 2013.04.09 22:25:00 - [2] - Quote Eris Ernaga wrote: LAVS need a buff I recommend making the LAV a 4 seat heavy armored vehicle instead of having a gunner on the back the passenger next to the driver seat would control a gun on top of the vehicle via remote. LAV would have tops and sides to protect the driver from incoming AV weapons. If not redesigning the LAV then make this another kind of fast light ground vehicle. LAVS are pointless and the gunners get shot down to fast they need some form of protection. sorta like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Saudi_Arabian_Humvee.jpg but the passenger next to the driver seat controls the gun. Style of the humvee would of course be more dust and faction style. You could kill that guy just as easy as now, and the people in that vehicle would be killed by a .22 through the doors and windows.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 99	Posted - 2013.04.09 22:26:00 - [3] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: LAVS need a buff I recommend making the LAV a 4 seat heavy armored vehicle instead of having a gunner on the back the passenger next to the driver seat would control a gun on top of the vehicle via remote. LAV would have tops and sides to protect the driver from incoming AV weapons. If not redesigning the LAV then make this another kind of fast light ground vehicle. LAVS are pointless and the gunners get shot down to fast they need some form of protection. sorta like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Saudi_Arabian_Humvee.jpg but the passenger next to the driver seat controls the gun. Style of the humvee would of course be more dust and faction style. You could kill that guy just as easy as now, and the people in that vehicle would be killed by a .22 through the doors and windows. Thats why lav needs buff and make no windows in the lav just a front window of camera so you can see. There to fragile right now.
Rowdy Railgunner Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 14	Posted - 2013.04.09 22:28:00 - [4] - Quote So you want the LAV to be a HAV.
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 1199	Posted - 2013.04.09 22:42:00 - [5] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: So you want the LAV to be a HAV. No, the OP wants LAVs to be MAVs. But it would still be awesome if we had something to protect us from getting shot out.
Ulysses Knapse Nuevo Atlas Corporation 207	Posted - 2013.04.09 22:58:00 - [6] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: LAVS need a buff I recommend making the LAV a 4 seat heavy armored vehicle instead of having a gunner on the back the passenger next to the driver seat would control a gun on top of the vehicle via remote. LAV would have tops and sides to protect the driver from incoming AV weapons. If not redesigning the LAV then make this another kind of fast light ground vehicle. LAVS are pointless and the gunners get shot down to fast they need some form of protection. sorta like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Saudi_Arabian_Humvee.jpg but the passenger next to the driver seat controls the gun. Style of the humvee would of course be more dust and faction style. You could kill that guy just as easy as now, and the people in that vehicle would be killed by a .22 through the doors and windows. For all you know, the windows could be made of an advanced futuristic membrane. Either way, it still offers more protection than a standard LAV.
Rowdy Railgunner Resheph Interstellar Strategy Gallente Federation 14	Posted - 2013.04.09 23:06:00 - [7] - Quote Ulysses Knapse wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: LAVS need a buff I recommend making the LAV a 4 seat heavy armored vehicle instead of having a gunner on the back the passenger next to the driver seat would control a gun on top of the vehicle via remote. LAV would have tops and sides to protect the driver from incoming AV weapons. If not redesigning the LAV then make this another kind of fast light ground vehicle. LAVS are pointless and the gunners get shot down to fast they need some form of protection. sorta like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Saudi_Arabian_Humvee.jpg but the passenger next to the driver seat controls the gun. Style of the humvee would of course be more dust and faction style. You could kill that guy just as easy as now, and the people in that vehicle would be killed by a .22 through the doors and windows. For all you know, the windows could be made of an advanced futuristic membrane. Either way, it still offers more protection than a standard LAV. Actually they are, it is an invention called plastic. Way ahead of its time.
Ulysses Knapse Nuevo Atlas Corporation 209	Posted - 2013.04.09 23:09:00 - [8] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Ulysses Knapse wrote: Rowdy Railgunner wrote: Eris Ernaga wrote: LAVS need a buff I recommend making the LAV a 4 seat heavy armored vehicle instead of having a gunner on the back the passenger next to the driver seat would control a gun on top of the vehicle via remote. LAV would have tops and sides to protect the driver from incoming AV weapons. If not redesigning the LAV then make this another kind of fast light ground vehicle. LAVS are pointless and the gunners get shot down to fast they need some form of protection. sorta like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/87/Saudi_Arabian_Humvee.jpg but the passenger next to the driver seat controls the gun. Style of the humvee would of course be more dust and faction style. You could kill that guy just as easy as now, and the people in that vehicle would be killed by a .22 through the doors and windows. For all you know, the windows could be made of an advanced futuristic membrane. Either way, it still offers more protection than a standard LAV. Actually they are, it is an invention called plastic. Way ahead of its time. I meant in Dust.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 99	Posted - 2013.04.10 00:30:00 - [9] - Quote Rowdy Railgunner wrote: So you want the LAV to be a HAV. no not a hav a buff to the lav with a redesign for safer movement around the battle field and an additional two passenger seats in the back. A removal of the gunner seat and let the passenger control the gun with a remote/computer built into the lav dashboard.
Thrillhouse Van Houten DIOS EX. 59	Posted - 2013.04.10 00:53:00 - [10] - Quote I think LAVs need a true buff. No need to change anything on them... ...they should add a bulletproof shield to the front of the turret. Open above the gun but still provides a modicum of protection from frontal fire. As it is right now, I can literally stare down a LAV from the front (assuming it isn't hauling ass to run me down) and gun down a turret gunner before he can gun me down. The turrets are hilariously underpowered unless you have the most advanced ones. An Exile AR shouldn't be stronger than a militia 20GJ Blaster...they are in the same tier for goodness sakes and one is a MOUNTED TURRET. I picked two gunners out of a DS yesterday before the third finally got a bead on me and took me out and I could have easily stepped back and hid. All vehicle types need a massive buff. AV grenades need to be explode on contact but NOT seeking. Buff the other AV stuff just slightly. Make some goon with two packed AV grenades less of a threat to every vehicle on the road. My dream vehicle situation is an artillery vehicle that is ultra long range firing mortar style rockets using a pop up map requiring infantry to laser tag targets in order to acquire them. Slow and generally vulnerable to AV guys and good LAV guys, but dynamite against HAVs. Then they could make HAVs something to seriously fear.

Valkreena Haederox Royal Uhlans Amarr Empire 31	Posted - 2013.04.10 02:52:00 - [11] - Quote LAVs are light assault vehicles. They are by nature, fragile and poorly armored. They are for harrassing motions and moving speedily from point A to point B. What you want poster, is not light. You want an APC. That would likely be an MAV.
Bojo The Fantastic Bojo's Grand Bazaar 0	Posted - 2013.04.10 06:01:00 - [12] - Quote Yeah this is a "Buff" in the wrong direction kiddo. A buff would be removal of free LAVs followed by a soft nerf on AV. AND I MEAN SOFT.
Eris Ernaga GamersForChrist 99	Posted - 2013.04.10 06:28:00 - [13] - Quote Bojo The Fantastic wrote: Yeah this is a "Buff" in the wrong direction kiddo. A buff would be removal of free LAVs followed by a soft nerf on AV. AND I MEAN SOFT. I'm not a kiddo and I feel you are jumping to conclusions. Hows does a lav effect av being nerfed makes no since to me.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]