| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
184
   |
Posted - 2013.03.28 21:51:00 -
[1] - Quote
is that... per side????
Peace
B |
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
3279
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago) |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2180
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:13:00 -
[3] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago)
So in the next build, they're going to "increase" the player count up to WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY?
I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as an "increase" here in the real world. |
BASSMEANT
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
184
|
Posted - 2013.03.28 22:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
yeah i was gonna say what the dude said above but minus the yelling.
see when i read the notes i saw
squads increased to 6 (which incidentally should scare the CRAAAAAP outta the casuals. that's like a 40% decrease to their kd right there)
but then they also said the title thing so in relation to the statement, if i read it correctly, they are bumping it up to a REAL number and those rooms are going to be 64 player rooms.
which is a legit and holy thing.
if it doesn't laaaaag like a bufu.
things might actually be lookin up
Peace
B |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:35:00 -
[5] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago) So in the next build, they're going to "increase" the player count up to WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY? I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as an "increase" here in the real world.
What we have right now is 12v12, that is 24 players.
they are increasing it to 32, that's 16v16
more than bf3 can handle, so quit your bitchin. |
Moochie Cricket
SyNergy Gaming
184
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:42:00 -
[6] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago) So in the next build, they're going to "increase" the player count up to WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY? I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as an "increase" here in the real world. What we have right now is 12v12, that is 24 players. they are increasing it to 32, that's 16v16 more than bf3 can handle, so quit your bitchin.
You are wrong. We already have 16v16. So quit your bitchin. |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2189
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
tribal wyvern wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago) So in the next build, they're going to "increase" the player count up to WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY? I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as an "increase" here in the real world. What we have right now is 12v12, that is 24 players. they are increasing it to 32, that's 16v16 more than bf3 can handle, so quit your bitchin.
...you sure?
I haven't played today, and I've just overdosed myself on codeine (not deliberate), so I'm not at my most coherent, but I'm at least 90% sure - possibly more - that we're already running 16 vs. 16.
EDIT: Ninjaed with confirmation I was right. Thank you Moochie! |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
315
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:43:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tis true. We already have 16v16. Probably going up to 32v32. |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
714
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Moochie Cricket wrote:tribal wyvern wrote:Garrett Blacknova wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago) So in the next build, they're going to "increase" the player count up to WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY? I'm pretty sure that doesn't count as an "increase" here in the real world. What we have right now is 12v12, that is 24 players. they are increasing it to 32, that's 16v16 more than bf3 can handle, so quit your bitchin. You are wrong. We already have 16v16. So quit your bitchin.
I was so sure it was 12v12 lol, I stand corrected.
|
Maken Tosch
Planetary Response Organisation
Test Friends Please Ignore
1821
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
I've been playing since Replication (closed beta) and I have been seeing 16v16 for a long time since then. Take a look at the roster more often. |
|
|
Bling Blaine
FrontLine-Coalition
5
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
Laheon wrote:Tis true. We already have 16v16. Probably going up to 32v32.
Now your talkin, on the way to actual battlefields. 
As I heard CCP state in a video interview their maps are developed to support over 100 players per match.
So 32vs32 would seem very logical to me, or they made a big typo stating "raising player count to 32" |
crazy space 1
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
977
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
I thought it was going up to 24v 24 next?
6 man squads
4 squads per team |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2190
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:56:00 -
[13] - Quote
Bling Blaine wrote:So 32vs32 would seem very logical to me, or they made a big typo stating "raising player count to 32"
Or the typo was the "pub matches" part, since the Corp Battles (which will now be based around Planetary Conquest) are going up to 32. |
Laheon
Osmon Surveillance
Caldari State
315
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 00:56:00 -
[14] - Quote
The numbers make sense, but it's possible that the two are left over. One for a pilot, one for a command suit? Or another tactical commander. Or something. |
Sloth9230
Reaper Galactic
663
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 01:03:00 -
[15] - Quote
BASSMEANT wrote:
squads increased to 6 (which incidentally should scare the CRAAAAAP outta the casuals. that's like a 40% decrease to their kd right there)
Kitten, i'm gonna go back into the negatives  |
Garrett Blacknova
Codex Troopers
2193
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 01:17:00 -
[16] - Quote
Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago)
I'm about 70% sure that one of the Devs (not a GM) mentioned that 48 players would probably be coming in "the next build" near the beginning of Chromosome. IIRC (which I probably don't), it involved something along the lines of "we plan to have" rather than being a definitive statement. |
tribal wyvern
ZionTCD
Legacy Rising
715
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 01:37:00 -
[17] - Quote
Maken Tosch wrote:I've been playing since Replication (closed beta) and I have been seeing 16v16 for a long time since then. Take a look at the roster more often.
I'm a closed beta player too, playing for a year. I just never noticed the player count as the board in the war room does not display full players, some of the players are off screen and I don't always look at the in game board.
|
Iron Wolf Saber
BetaMax.
CRONOS.
3286
|
Posted - 2013.03.29 03:52:00 -
[18] - Quote
Garrett Blacknova wrote:Iron Wolf Saber wrote:total. as for the 48 I am investigated where it was stated outside the original sales pitch of the game. (48 was promised way long ago) I'm about 70% sure that one of the Devs (not a GM) mentioned that 48 players would probably be coming in "the next build" near the beginning of Chromosome. IIRC (which I probably don't), it involved something along the lines of "we plan to have" rather than being a definitive statement.
That's why I am looking around for a fresh source. they're easily drowned out when this has been promised for a long time and can easily slip under the radar, I mean who notices a new raincloud in the middle of a rain storm? |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |