|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
14
   |
Posted - 2013.03.18 08:44:00 -
[1] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:People mean that the Advanced and (especially) the Proto Heavy need a buff, not the Heavy in general. I see CCP's problem tho, The type 1 can happily fit 2x complex dmg mods and a MH-82 HMG but not much else, any buff in suits you just start adding to whats balanced...
I'm going to have to try that fit out and see if the 65K+ isk price tag is worth it.
Further, yes heavies need to be buffed. On the inside of my over-sized jacket coattails there are six f@nny packs. Three on each side. So all of my heavy suites deserve to have six Equipment slots.
edit note: For some reason f@anny is being detected a a curse word...  |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
14
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 09:09:00 -
[2] - Quote
WyrmHero1945 wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:People mean that the Advanced and (especially) the Proto Heavy need a buff, not the Heavy in general. I see CCP's problem tho, The type 1 can happily fit 2x complex dmg mods and a MH-82 HMG but not much else, any buff in suits you just start adding to whats balanced... I'm going to have to try that fit out and see if the 65K+ isk price tag is worth it. Further, yes heavies need to be buffed. On the inside of my over-sized jacket coattails there are six f@nny packs. Three on each side. So all of my heavy suites deserve to have six Equipment slots. edit note: For some reason f@anny is being detected a a curse word... Let's just say that slots, equipment and CPU/PG are in the backpack. Logis have the largest followed by assault. Then heavy has smaller backpack than assault, which means fewer slots than assault and no equipment. Heavies have a ton amount of HP, people just have to stop pretending they're invincible with the heavy suit and take more cover.
Don't dis the f@nny packs Bro.
I started out as the Sentinel class and have never thought heavies should get Equipment slots. In fact I think the number of equipment slots on non-logis should be fewer. If the Artificer has to give up his Side-Arm slot and be stuck with an SMG (which is a side-arm, how funny is that?) the least CCP could do is keep his role special. Upper tier Assault and Scouts don't really need them anymore. |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:22:00 -
[3] - Quote
ChromeBreaker wrote:Rusty Shallows wrote:ChromeBreaker wrote:Bendtner92 wrote:People mean that the Advanced and (especially) the Proto Heavy need a buff, not the Heavy in general. I see CCP's problem tho, The type 1 can happily fit 2x complex dmg mods and a MH-82 HMG but not much else, any buff in suits you just start adding to whats balanced... I'm going to have to try that fit out and see if the 65K+ isk price tag is worth it. You need a CPU upgrade in the low. Or decent skills ofcourse. Im lucky enough to get logi "heavy" squads so dont notice much, and tbh for a heavy suit that isnt expensive (my FG suit is expensive! lol)
CromeBreaker you are indeed a lucky devil. I have to put on a pink tank-top and do unspeakable things to even get a logi to think about repping me. So I generally roll in a cheap 30k to 40k suite.
Yes I do have decent (or at least OK) fitting skills so the only question is which armor repair module can be shoehorned in there. It sure is rough fitting the suites when HMGs have higher fitting requirements than the assault rifle equivalents. Although from your costs reaction my guess is you roll with at least meta 8 HMGs and measure your fatty suites like some people do militia tanks.
I still remember way back when HMGs were completely useless. So it wouldn't surprise me if CCP accidentally nerfed them to that place again. |
Rusty Shallows
Creative Killers
15
|
Posted - 2013.03.18 19:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
fahrenheitM wrote:Onlything Heavies need is their skirt removed. Why are they wearing a dress? 
Sometimes we like to turn around and moon our foes Braveheart style.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2OC7ExGmXI |
|
|
| |
|