Bald Crusader Two
Kang Lo Directorate Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2013.03.01 13:42:00 -
[1] - Quote
John,
I'm not sure what you are doing but I'd like to draw your attention to this. You should recognize it, you only copy/pasted it three days ago.
Quote:The DUST 514 Community Team operates a tiered system of warnings and associated forum suspensions of various lengths, depending on the severity and number of transgressions of the rules. The list below shows the structure of our warning and suspension policy. Please be aware that if a transgression of the rules is severe enough, this policy may be bypassed completely in favor of permanent revocation of a forum userGÇÖs posting privileges.
1ST OFFENCE GÇô WARNING 2ND OFFENCE GÇô 14 DAY SUSPENSION 3RD OFFENCE GÇô 30 DAY SUSPENSION 4TH OFFENCE GÇô 90 DAY SUSPENSION 5TH OFFENCE GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION 6+ OFFENCES GÇô 180 DAY SUSPENSION (OR PERMANENT BAN IF TRANSGRESSION IS SEVERE ENOUGH) You're not exactly practicing what you preach here are you?
A bit more of the CCP tendency to tell the public one thing, do another thing in private? Feels familiar.
I'm trying to stay positive about your underlying motivations, but your actions are farcical. However, you already know that.
Now I've read some of your work and I'm sure someone like yourself with a school boy's talent for words would have recognized that DEV blog for what it was. Somewhat bland, disjointed through a lack of cohesive narrative and without the polish one would expect from a typical CCP DEV blog.
And even if it wasn't (and this is important for everyone) anyone should be able to make reasonable comment on their like or dislike for one without sanction - or CCP breaking their own rules in a knee jerk response to critism.
If you prefer I can be more eloquent with my feedback in the future, but you need to keep in mind some of us aren't paid to sit on forums all day so my responses aren't always essay length.
I know you're still annoyed at me for all that skill point caveat back and forth from the other night, but really this was no way to respond.
All I am doing here is trying to promote consistency and transparency. Things that for some reason CCP have repeatedly lashed out against.
It would be a shame if you fell into that same trap John as when I see these behaviors I'm simply going to keep calling them out.
|