DUST Search - The League of Rational Mercenaries

DigiOps wrote:

Bojo The Mighty wrote:

DigiOps wrote:

So, the rationale to believing these individuals to not be irrational is that you, in addition to the listed individuals, assert them as being rational?

What's the point? Unless the point is that there isn't one in which case the previous two questions are now moot. In such an event, I'll have to default to the following statement: I like trains.

There is no point to it. Most of the list can be considered rational amongst the commons by the comments they receive and the the logic behind their posts.

There is no point, this isn't granting anybody special anything, I just made a list more of reference to the public as to who is more worthwhile to listen to.

A sane person will call themselves sane. An insane person will call themselves sane. Amongst all of those who claim to be sane, who really is?

That's why this thread means nothing other than public reference.

Does this mean you, unlike Nexhawk and myself, are not particularly fond of trains? I see no mention here. I now question your credibility, sir.

Pages: [1] 2 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:11:00 - [1] - Quote Rational People
Icy Tiger Universal Allies Inc. 1026	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:17:00 - [2] - Quote ^+Noc Tempre
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:18:00 - [3] - Quote Icy Tiger wrote: ^+Noc Tempre Updated. Truth.
METR0 THE DESTR0YER Imperfects Negative-Feedback 76	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:20:00 - [4] - Quote Me tooooooo?!?!?!?!?
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:26:00 - [5] - Quote METR0 THE DESTR0YER wrote: Me tooooooo?!?!?!?!? I have no idea who you are. One of the confirmed rationals must vouch for you and provide evidence.
Iron Wolf Saber BetaMax. 2867	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:29:00 - [6] - Quote ? But I didn't drink any of the flavor-aid. ? Also sorry metro never seen you anywhere until today.
Polish Hammer Conspiratus Immortalis 300	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:32:00 - [7] - Quote Zitro's =/= rational.
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:32:00 - [8] - Quote Iron Wolf Saber wrote: ? But I didn't drink any of the flavor-aid. ? Also sorry metro never seen you anywhere until today. You're on the list because you are rational....
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:35:00 - [9] - Quote Polish Hammer wrote: Zitro's =/= rational. You might be right....same about protoman
4447 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 649	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:36:00 - [10] - Quote Me!

Fivetimes Infinity Immobile Infantry 1086	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:39:00 - [11] - Quote How rational is it to make a thread for no purpose other than giving your friends handjobs? Maybe you should take yourself off the list.
Piercing Serenity Pink Fluffy Bounty Hunterz RISE of LEGION 181	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:44:00 - [12] - Quote This is already a 'club'. This thread just gives them a name. Personally, I skim the forums for threads that these guys post in. Seeing Cross, Zan, Garret, and Rorek's name lets me know that not only does the topic merit some thought, it has also been responded to thoughtfully and respectfully. But, at the risk of sounding like a party pooper, I'd like to say congratulations to the League of Rational Mercenaries PS
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:45:00 - [13] - Quote Fivetimes Infinity wrote: How rational is it to make a thread for no purpose other than giving your friends handjobs? Maybe you should take yourself off the list. Most rational comment yet. Updated. List of people who don't spew ****. Some may have gone troll but we all have gone troll. And by no means am I "friends" with Sleepy Zan Kagehoshi Horned Wolf Exmaple Core Skihids Cross Atu Brush Master (can't say for sure) Pimp Macdaddy actually has some sense Zitro (investigation) ugg reset Django Quik Iron Wolf Saber Tectonious Falcon Noc Tempre Polish Hammer who the hell even makes friends over the internet? A few are just my in game allies. If they asked me to give them an HJ I'd break their jaw given the chance.
KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3064	Posted - 2013.02.06 02:56:00 - [14] - Quote Hooray! I'm in a special club :) I nominate Laurent Cazaderon, and Garrett Blacknova
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:03:00 - [15] - Quote KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf wrote: Hooray! I'm in a special club :) I nominate Laurent Cazaderon, and Garrett Blacknova Yeah I remember seeing reasonable stuff from the Garrett guy, Laurent sounds familiar. Provide proof of the rationality.
Necandi Brasil Conspiratus Immortalis 245	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:06:00 - [16] - Quote I'm not Irrational ...
Mithridates VI New Eden Research Foundation 165	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:07:00 - [17] - Quote If OP has any interest in convincing others of the rationality of those listed, evidence beyond a list and an unsupported assertion are going to be required. I mean, I'm not disagreeing. I just need some kind of justification if I'ma update my belief. If you're not in this for the convincing and just need a place to document your opinion... carry on, citizen.
DOCTOR WHO Clone The Last Time-Lord 6	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:10:00 - [18] - Quote I know there is a spot for the Doctor. :)
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:11:00 - [19] - Quote Mithridates VI wrote: If OP has any interest in convincing others of the rationality of those listed, evidence beyond a list and an unsupported assertion are going to be required. I mean, I'm not disagreeing. I just need some kind of justification if I'ma update my belief. If you're not in this for the convcing and just need a place to document your opinion... carry on, citizen. You are only too correct. I'm not really out to convince anybody more just make a public list of people who have enough brain cells to think. But yeah I guess that we're going to have to dig through the posts and provide evidence.
HowDidThatTaste Imperfects Negative-Feedback 2242	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:24:00 - [20] - Quote I like this idea, and sleepy can speak for me.

Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 03:43:00 - [21] - Quote HowDidThatTaste wrote: I like this idea, and sleepy can speak for me. Sure. Updated.
DigiOps DUST University Ivy League 85	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:08:00 - [22] - Quote So, the rationale to believing these individuals to not be irrational is that you, in addition to the listed individuals, assert them as being rational? What's the point? Unless the point is that there isn't one in which case the previous two questions are now moot. In such an event, I'll have to default to the following statement: I like trains.
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:15:00 - [23] - Quote DigiOps wrote: So, the rationale to believing these individuals to not be irrational is that you, in addition to the listed individuals, assert them as being rational? What's the point? Unless the point is that there isn't one in which case the previous two questions are now moot. In such an event, I'll have to default to the following statement: I like trains. There is no point to it. Most of the list can be considered rational amongst the commons by the comments they receive and the the logic behind their posts. There is no point, this isn't granting anybody special anything, I just made a list more of reference to the public as to who is more worthwhile to listen to. A sane person will call themselves sane. An insane person will call themselves sane. Amongst all of those who claim to be sane, who really is? That's why this thread means nothing other than public reference.
Ner'Zul Nexhawk Talos Incorporated 153	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:18:00 - [24] - Quote 1) League of Rational Mercenaries - created by a person who isn't considered rational, as proven by Fivetimes Infinity. 2)Thus, since this person included himself at first, all members' characteristics that put them into the League are identical to that person's characteristics. 3) However, according to the statement #1 and transitioning it into #2, all members of the League are deemed irrational by the creator of the League. I see a contradiction developing here. And I also like trains.
DigiOps DUST University Ivy League 85	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:20:00 - [25] - Quote Bojo The Mighty wrote: DigiOps wrote: So, the rationale to believing these individuals to not be irrational is that you, in addition to the listed individuals, assert them as being rational? What's the point? Unless the point is that there isn't one in which case the previous two questions are now moot. In such an event, I'll have to default to the following statement: I like trains. There is no point to it. Most of the list can be considered rational amongst the commons by the comments they receive and the the logic behind their posts. There is no point, this isn't granting anybody special anything, I just made a list more of reference to the public as to who is more worthwhile to listen to. A sane person will call themselves sane. An insane person will call themselves sane. Amongst all of those who claim to be sane, who really is? That's why this thread means nothing other than public reference. Does this mean you, unlike Nexhawk and myself, are not particularly fond of trains? I see no mention here. I now question your credibility, sir.
Bojo The Mighty Bojo's School of the Trades 431	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:22:00 - [26] - Quote DigiOps wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: DigiOps wrote: So, the rationale to believing these individuals to not be irrational is that you, in addition to the listed individuals, assert them as being rational? What's the point? Unless the point is that there isn't one in which case the previous two questions are now moot. In such an event, I'll have to default to the following statement: I like trains. There is no point to it. Most of the list can be considered rational amongst the commons by the comments they receive and the the logic behind their posts. There is no point, this isn't granting anybody special anything, I just made a list more of reference to the public as to who is more worthwhile to listen to. A sane person will call themselves sane. An insane person will call themselves sane. Amongst all of those who claim to be sane, who really is? That's why this thread means nothing other than public reference. Does this mean you, unlike Nexhawk and myself, are not particularly fond of trains? I see no mention here. I now question your credibility, sir. Only 1" scale and above, none of that HO scale
Ner'Zul Nexhawk Talos Incorporated 153	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:23:00 - [27] - Quote DigiOps wrote: Bojo The Mighty wrote: DigiOps wrote: So, the rationale to believing these individuals to not be irrational is that you, in addition to the listed individuals, assert them as being rational? What's the point? Unless the point is that there isn't one in which case the previous two questions are now moot. In such an event, I'll have to default to the following statement: I like trains. There is no point to it. Most of the list can be considered rational amongst the commons by the comments they receive and the the logic behind their posts. There is no point, this isn't granting anybody special anything, I just made a list more of reference to the public as to who is more worthwhile to listen to. A sane person will call themselves sane. An insane person will call themselves sane. Amongst all of those who claim to be sane, who really is? That's why this thread means nothing other than public reference. Does this mean you, unlike Nexhawk and myself, are not particularly fond of trains? I see no mention here. I now question your credibility, sir. It might be a conspiracy to undermine our sanity, my fellow colleague. Tread carefully.
DigiOps DUST University Ivy League 85	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:23:00 - [28] - Quote Oh... Well in that case, point well taken.
DigiOps DUST University Ivy League 85	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:29:00 - [29] - Quote Ner'Zul Nexhawk wrote: It might be a conspiracy to undermine our sanity, my fellow colleague. Tread carefully. Don't fear for my sake. Its quite obvious what shenanigans this unsavory character is up to. Indeed, this conspiracy has gone on long enough, but such matters require delicate hands. I shall attempt to impregnate their ranks and learn there ways in the hopes of gaining their trust.
Ner'Zul Nexhawk Talos Incorporated 153	Posted - 2013.02.06 04:33:00 - [30] - Quote DigiOps wrote: Ner'Zul Nexhawk wrote: It might be a conspiracy to undermine our sanity, my fellow colleague. Tread carefully. Don't fear for my sake. Its quite obvious what shenanigans this unsavory character is up to. Indeed, this conspiracy has gone on long enough, but such matters require delicate hands. I shall attempt to impregnate their ranks and learn there ways in the hopes of gaining their trust. I most sincerely wish you best of luck. While you perform such a brave deed, I will recede into shadows and observe from a distance, potentially offering you my insight on the situation. We never spoke of this.



Pages: [1] 2 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page