Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
BISHOP 005
Valor Coalition RISE of LEGION
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
4 man squads are getting tired.. players are starting to join corps.. or people jus want to play with some buddies. 4 man squads will not fulfill most our party up desires.... Point is.. I want to play on the same team with my guys nd this won't cut it |
KryptixX
Imperfects Negative-Feedback
321
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:11:00 -
[2] - Quote
get over it.
its coming soon. |
ChromeBreaker
SVER True Blood Unclaimed.
197
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
Soon (TM) |
lordjanuz
Norwegian Dust514 Corporation
88
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:26:00 -
[4] - Quote
Mybe when we get to The summer.. |
BISHOP 005
Valor Coalition RISE of LEGION
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Yea I kno its coming soon just not soon enough... I been playing dust since the 1st build.. I jus t like to see improvements like the next guy.. so I'm posting it just like the next guy.. does ne1 know when? |
Bigglesworth McQueen
On The Brink
43
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Bigger squads = no need for UVT.
UVT allows corp voice chat, and custom channels larger than 4 players. We already have bigger groups, they're just not free. |
Prius Vecht
Red and Silver Hand Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 16:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
BISHOP 005 wrote:Yea I kno its coming soon just not soon enough... I been playing dust since the 1st build.. I jus t like to see improvements like the next guy.. so I'm posting it just like the next guy.. does ne1 know when?
supposed to be here next build. groups of six. probly this month. |
BISHOP 005
Valor Coalition RISE of LEGION
2
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 17:18:00 -
[8] - Quote
Bigglesworth McQueen wrote:Bigger squads = no need for UVT.
UVT allows corp voice chat, and custom channels larger than 4 players. We already have bigger groups, they're just not free.
UVT only allows u to speak, not group up.. it can help with the que sync, but its not a sure thing that's going to work 100% of the time... Do you understand? |
Beren Hurin
OMNI Endeavors
183
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 17:21:00 -
[9] - Quote
Just keep in mind that increased squad size will come with a 'cost'.
Cons: The more squads you have the more squad bonuses you can (potentially have). Unless the 6 man squad is all sticking together, it is unlikely that all their points will generate the synergy that a 4 man squad does. Also, in pub matches, where almost 40% of a team is together and coordinated, those matches may tip 'unfairly?' in favor of that squad.
Pros: Additionally, from a corp development perspective, if you need, on average, 25% of your corp to be competant squad leaders, you would now need less if you want a bigger squad doctrine. More people on a squad means easier time getting WP for that squad, which means quicker OBs.
If they do allow 6 man player made squads, they should only pair them against teams with at least another 6 man squad. |
|
GM Hercules
Game Masters C C P Alliance
336
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 19:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
This should go in our Feedback/Request forum.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Sylwester Dziewiecki
BetaMax.
33
|
Posted - 2013.02.05 21:34:00 -
[11] - Quote
BISHOP 005 wrote:4 man squads are getting tired.. players are starting to join corps.. or people jus want to play with some buddies. 4 man squads will not fulfill most our party up desires.... Point is.. I want to play on the same team with my guys nd this won't cut it I would agree if it was not as annoying as it is now. Right now 4-ppl squad are ok until someone starts to have problems with: voice-bug, no battle available bug, 3ppl in battel 1 ppl in MQ bug, infinite deployment bug.. etc. Someone is restarting his console and 3 people is waiting for him because it would be not nice to star without him. Bigger squad means more problems. When CCP implement 4-persone squad I was not happy about it at all, but now when I understand why they did.. I hope they will introduced 6-persone squads SOON(tm). |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |