Pages: 1 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
![Konohamaru Sarutobi Konohamaru Sarutobi](https://forums.dust514.com/themes/ccpDust514/avatars/avatar_1_male_128.jpg)
Konohamaru Sarutobi
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
91
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2012.12.29 19:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
I don't know why do you buff the speed shoot, but now you just made them better than snipers. They shoot faster than sniper rifles with so much range and of course, more destructive power. I don't know what's the point of that increase, because redline/redzone it's still a problem. Maybe it will always be. But this way, you're making easier the job for a "Sniper Tank" and I don't know if that's the porpuse for tanks.
You nerf the missiles because people complaing about spamming tanks, but now it's the same with railgun. So i don't understand why did you make that.
I think, they were better before because Railgun doesn't look as an anti infantry weapon. |
![Ulysses Knapse Ulysses Knapse](https://forums.dust514.com/themes/ccpDust514/avatars/avatar_4_male_128.jpg)
Ulysses Knapse
Nuevo Atlas Corporation
73
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2012.12.29 21:55:00 -
[2] - Quote
1. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is more expensive. 2. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is more visible. 3. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is less agile. 4. It has no scope. |
![Konohamaru Sarutobi Konohamaru Sarutobi](https://forums.dust514.com/themes/ccpDust514/avatars/avatar_1_male_128.jpg)
Konohamaru Sarutobi
Ahrendee Mercenaries Legacy Rising
91
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2012.12.30 00:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ulysses Knapse wrote:1. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is more expensive. 2. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is more visible. 3. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is less agile. 4. It has no scope.
5. The "sniper" (Tank) need to take 5+ shots from a Proto FG/Launch Rocket, considering that they can snipe in their base/redzone and they can get cover easy |
![Ulysses Knapse Ulysses Knapse](https://forums.dust514.com/themes/ccpDust514/avatars/avatar_4_male_128.jpg)
Ulysses Knapse
Nuevo Atlas Corporation
73
![View only posts by author View only posts by author](/images/icon_filter.gif) |
Posted - 2012.12.30 04:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
Konohamaru Sarutobi wrote:Ulysses Knapse wrote:1. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is more expensive. 2. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is more visible. 3. It has to be mounted on a vehicle, which is less agile. 4. It has no scope. 5. The "sniper" (Tank) need to take 5+ shots from a Proto FG/Launch Rocket, considering that they can snipe in their base/redzone and they can get cover easy Except they have to stay out of cover for longer, and have to be farther away from safety, because without a scope they can't see far enough or shoot precisely enough to hit a target at the same distance as a sniper, or hope to hit a target as accurately, and snipers can shoot from cover. HAVs have a harder time getting to and taking cover, and are even more expensive, LAVs are more likely to get shot out of existence before they have a chance to get to cover. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 :: [one page] |