DUST Search - (Request) HAV Single Turret Fitting.

DarkShadowFox wrote:

Garrett Blacknova wrote:

I hope not.

MAV with a gunner-controlled Large Turret would be nice. A tank that's designed as a solo weapon platform seems either stupidly risky or stupidly OP. There's no middle ground on how it's going to work out.

yes their is. its called forge gunners and HAV's dont last long as is, so everything eventually if you max out everything, to everyone is going to be OP. They haven't implemented HAV sepearation, so why not give HAV's an edge for once instead of hating on them. If they wanted an infantry game, they should have made it with just infantry cause where the build/ game is now, is all it is infantry. Theres going to be no jets, I doubt theirs going to be mechs like we saw at e3, theres going to be like just what we have now and that's about it.

"Dust514 a revoultionary new game from the makers of EVE online" has gone to, "Dust514, an mmofps, that is better than what it used to be, but still is not at its full potential"

I really hope CCP isnt trying to rush the closed beta session out into the open just so they can get more feedback cause if so this game is gonna go in the toilet with all the horrible COD and Bf3 fanboys that are going to flood this place even more.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
DarkShadowFox Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 238	Posted - 2012.12.21 16:45:00 - [1] - Quote Since We Have the ability to fit turrets now as one two and three and we have to fit them all, can we please get a single large turret HAV body with only one slot and as many slots a a militia tank? but available in militia, regular, and proto? It would give people who are starting out a change to get used to the tank controls and not have to worry about killing people, or for people who just dont want other people in their HAV. Thats it, Discuss.
Vermaak Kuvakei Doomheim 88	Posted - 2012.12.21 17:03:00 - [2] - Quote Too solo play bent
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 1849	Posted - 2012.12.21 17:21:00 - [3] - Quote I hope not. MAV with a gunner-controlled Large Turret would be nice. A tank that's designed as a solo weapon platform seems either stupidly risky or stupidly OP. There's no middle ground on how it's going to work out.
DarkShadowFox Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 238	Posted - 2012.12.21 17:52:00 - [4] - Quote Garrett Blacknova wrote: I hope not. MAV with a gunner-controlled Large Turret would be nice. A tank that's designed as a solo weapon platform seems either stupidly risky or stupidly OP. There's no middle ground on how it's going to work out. yes their is. its called forge gunners and HAV's dont last long as is, so everything eventually if you max out everything, to everyone is going to be OP. They haven't implemented HAV sepearation, so why not give HAV's an edge for once instead of hating on them. If they wanted an infantry game, they should have made it with just infantry cause where the build/ game is now, is all it is infantry. Theres going to be no jets, I doubt theirs going to be mechs like we saw at e3, theres going to be like just what we have now and that's about it. "Dust514 a revoultionary new game from the makers of EVE online" has gone to, "Dust514, an mmofps, that is better than what it used to be, but still is not at its full potential" I really hope CCP isnt trying to rush the closed beta session out into the open just so they can get more feedback cause if so this game is gonna go in the toilet with all the horrible COD and Bf3 fanboys that are going to flood this place even more.
Garrett Blacknova Codex Troopers 1849	Posted - 2012.12.21 17:57:00 - [5] - Quote DarkShadowFox wrote: Garrett Blacknova wrote: I hope not. MAV with a gunner-controlled Large Turret would be nice. A tank that's designed as a solo weapon platform seems either stupidly risky or stupidly OP. There's no middle ground on how it's going to work out. yes their is. its called forge gunners and HAV's dont last long as is, so everything eventually if you max out everything, to everyone is going to be OP. They haven't implemented HAV sepearation, so why not give HAV's an edge for once instead of hating on them. If they wanted an infantry game, they should have made it with just infantry cause where the build/ game is now, is all it is infantry. Theres going to be no jets, I doubt theirs going to be mechs like we saw at e3, theres going to be like just what we have now and that's about it. "Dust514 a revoultionary new game from the makers of EVE online" has gone to, "Dust514, an mmofps, that is better than what it used to be, but still is not at its full potential" I really hope CCP isnt trying to rush the closed beta session out into the open just so they can get more feedback cause if so this game is gonna go in the toilet with all the horrible COD and Bf3 fanboys that are going to flood this place even more. HAVs could use a slight buff. But this suggestion isn't a buff to HAVs. it's either another vehicle that will need a buff, or it's different enough that it will end up being OP. The main reason HAVs are dangerous in Codex and Chromosome without being OP is because they need infantry support and/or gunners (basically, TEAMWORK) to be effective on the battlefield. Just like it takes TEAMWORK to take one down (unless the driver doesn't know what they're doing, or willingly sacrifices themselves for some reason).


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page