DUST Search - When the game expands

All Channels

General Discussions

When the game expands

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Scheneighnay McBob Bojo's School of the Trades 1058	Posted - 2012.12.11 23:37:00 - [1] - Quote When the maps themselves expand (as in, the redline is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay further back), do you think weapons will get a range boost? I think that right now, the range of some weapons is just silly. Small railguns have tiny range, large railguns can't make a shot across a valley, SMGs have about a 2m accurate range, etc. I was just thinking that perhaps when we have more room to fight, weapons will have a realistic range.
Tenchu-13 What The French 76	Posted - 2012.12.12 00:24:00 - [2] - Quote As in you want to change every single weapon into a sniperriffle .... ?! smg's are supossed to be close combat, Assualts should be midrange and a sniperriffle should be able to kill you from a pretty distant place... Nerf/buf ranges and it'll throw the whole game out of balance. On of the points of bigger maps is to get organized and actually get some real logistics running... as in using dropships for dropping people instead of bombarding the **** out of red dots. Same goes for LAVS, they are meant to move fast from A to B and not run over A then B. Ranges are perfect, people will just have to get into the logistic side of things. In the end DUST battles will be more about logistics (trooptransport) then simply offing the next red dot.
fred orpaul Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 211	Posted - 2012.12.12 02:26:00 - [3] - Quote ok so real life ars are good out to 300 meters burst, we are past that. with a few exceptions smgs are good out to100m, current smgs range from ** I could ** that far too well over 100m. snipers 1km is one hell of a shot, I regularly hit clear across maps. rails well we are going for realism so we have no frame of reference but invest the skills and I guarenty they go plenty far. every weapon in this game exceeds reality. so I dont know what you want. as it is ARs are at the limit of their usefullness as far as range, rails can out shoot forge, and a fully leveled SMG can go toe to toe with an AR at most ranges.
fred orpaul Tritan-Industries Legacy Rising 211	Posted - 2012.12.12 02:28:00 - [4] - Quote Tenchu-13 wrote: As in you want to change every single weapon into a sniperriffle .... ?! smg's are supossed to be close combat, Assualts should be midrange and a sniperriffle should be able to kill you from a pretty distant place... Nerf/buf ranges and it'll throw the whole game out of balance. On of the points of bigger maps is to get organized and actually get some real logistics running... as in using dropships for dropping people instead of bombarding the **** out of red dots. Same goes for LAVS, they are meant to move fast from A to B and not run over A then B. Ranges are perfect, people will just have to get into the logistic side of things. In the end DUST battles will be more about logistics (trooptransport) then simply offing the next red dot. very well put sir I should have kept my keyboard shut left it to you.
Ten-Sidhe Osmon Surveillance Caldari State 414	Posted - 2012.12.12 04:23:00 - [5] - Quote AR are Gallente, they favor the shortest range family of eve weapons. Once we get other rifles they will probably be longer ranged.
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1772	Posted - 2012.12.12 04:32:00 - [6] - Quote Am I to understand you want realism from your weapons in a SCI FI GAME? You realize if we went for realism every weapon would be OHK. Armies would be pointless, and the threat of orbital bombardment would either force most planets to surrender or live underground. If you want realism - go play CoD. Me, I want more toys to play with that are balanced - realism takes a back seat to gameplay. But I understand your point - there's still a lot to do around here. And CCP wants us to suffer as much as possible before giving us any light.
Sandromin Hes Sand Mercenary Corps Inc. 204	Posted - 2012.12.12 04:41:00 - [7] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Am I to understand you want realism from your weapons in a SCI FI GAME? You realize if we went for realism every weapon would be OHK. Armies would be pointless, and the threat of orbital bombardment would either force most planets to surrender or live underground. If you want realism - go play CoD. Me, I want more toys to play with that are balanced - realism takes a back seat to gameplay. But I understand your point - there's still a lot to do around here. And CCP wants us to suffer as much as possible before giving us any light. Lol... realism = CoD now? Lol nope.
SoTa PoP Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 1772	Posted - 2012.12.12 04:54:00 - [8] - Quote Sandromin Hes wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Am I to understand you want realism from your weapons in a SCI FI GAME? You realize if we went for realism every weapon would be OHK. Armies would be pointless, and the threat of orbital bombardment would either force most planets to surrender or live underground. If you want realism - go play CoD. Me, I want more toys to play with that are balanced - realism takes a back seat to gameplay. But I understand your point - there's still a lot to do around here. And CCP wants us to suffer as much as possible before giving us any light. Lol... realism = CoD now? Lol nope. ^ This is why people think this forum is littered with trolls rather then people who just want attention. This guy obviously can't see how CoD is more realistic compared to DUST. Must be a real stretch.
Octavian Vetiver Dog Nation United Relativity Alliance 152	Posted - 2012.12.12 05:06:00 - [9] - Quote SoTa PoP wrote: Sandromin Hes wrote: SoTa PoP wrote: Am I to understand you want realism from your weapons in a SCI FI GAME? You realize if we went for realism every weapon would be OHK. Armies would be pointless, and the threat of orbital bombardment would either force most planets to surrender or live underground. If you want realism - go play CoD. Me, I want more toys to play with that are balanced - realism takes a back seat to gameplay. But I understand your point - there's still a lot to do around here. And CCP wants us to suffer as much as possible before giving us any light. Lol... realism = CoD now? Lol nope. ^ This is why people think this forum is littered with trolls rather then people who just want attention. This guy obviously can't see how CoD is more realistic compared to DUST. Must be a real stretch. Realistically no game can ever come close to real combat. Arma, Operation Flashpoint and a few others like is maybe about as close as you'll get.
DUST Fiend Immobile Infantry 1900	Posted - 2012.12.12 05:53:00 - [10] - Quote I find it amusing that the laser rifle has less range than the assault rifle



Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.