| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zekain Kade
BetaMax.
931
   |
Posted - 2012.12.02 04:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
Something along the lines of making a corp battle, then password locking it so you are guaranteed to only have the one corp you want to fight accept it? |
William HBonney
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 04:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Yeah hate for real competition to join....but actually not a horrible idea. |
Dissonant Zan
157
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 04:41:00 -
[3] - Quote
Why not just organize a corp battle with the other corp, make battle, and then have them accept it immediately? |
Zekain Kade
BetaMax.
931
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 04:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
William HBonney wrote:Yeah hate for real competition to join....but actually not a horrible idea.
To allow player driven tournaments. or stupid, crazy games, like nova knife fights.
Dissonant Zan wrote:Why not just organize a corp battle with the other corp, make battle, and then have them accept it immediately? because once this game is released, the corp battle finder will have far more traffic then what it has now. you'll have a harder time trying to organize a privet corp because all of the new corps that'll be created will be accepting every corp contract that pops up. |
William HBonney
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 04:44:00 -
[5] - Quote
What PREPLANNING! No sir that is ludicrous! |
Dissonant Zan
157
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 04:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Zekain Kade wrote:allow the creation of player driven tournaments.
Now that's a good reason for this. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 05:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
Dissonant Zan wrote:Why not just organize a corp battle with the other corp, make battle, and then have them accept it immediately?
this.
@ OP corp battles are tied to Faction Warfare cant really lock it or ppl will pad the system too easily
there will be gladiator arenas u can setup for what ur looking for tho |
William HBonney
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 05:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
Hmmm I guess a Corp of all alter could funnel money that way....but I think money will be more easily moved. Corp battles don't give isk or sp |
Cyn Bruin
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
651
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 05:14:00 -
[9] - Quote
Zekain Kade wrote:that's not the reason for it. it's to allow corps to choose who they want to fight.
Why not fight everyone, that's the point of the game? If you want to choose who to fight, then organize it ahead of time like previously suggested. Schedule a time.
In a perfect world... corp battle contracts put up would be globally anonymous so you have no idea who puts it up or whom is accepting it. This way people can't pick and choose who to fight and back out if they dont like it.
|
William HBonney
Imperfects
Negative-Feedback
318
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 05:20:00 -
[10] - Quote
That is a great idea! That would really increase the gameble aspect. |
|
|
Dissonant Zan
157
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 05:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
William HBonney wrote:That is a great idea! That would really increase the gameble aspect.
Eventually we will fighting for planets. I don't think the anonymous contracts are necessary, later a corp can stay and protect their planet or pack up and leave if they don't think the cost is worth it. |
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 06:57:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cyn Bruin wrote:Zekain Kade wrote:that's not the reason for it. it's to allow corps to choose who they want to fight. Why not fight everyone, that's the point of the game? If you want to choose who to fight, then organize it ahead of time like previously suggested. Schedule a time. In a perfect world... corp battle contracts put up would be globally anonymous so you have no idea who puts it up or whom is accepting it. This way people can't pick and choose who to fight and back out if they dont like it.
been suggesting this since day ******* 1
good teams will get dodged often if ppl can see who their opponents are
same **** happened in socom 4, top teams rarely got matches because ppl would decline their challenges....hell once u had a certain number of rating points teams would insta decline ur challenge.
Needs to be anonymous.
all ppl need to know is hey this is what the payout is, this is who is issuing it.
|
Mavado V Noriega
SyNergy Gaming
2282
|
Posted - 2012.12.02 06:59:00 -
[13] - Quote
Dissonant Zan wrote:William HBonney wrote:That is a great idea! That would really increase the gameble aspect. Eventually we will fighting for planets. I don't think the anonymous contracts are necessary, later a corp can stay and protect their planet or pack up and leave if they don't think the cost is worth it.
well for nullsec yea but at launch in FW its gonna be this contract corp battle system so best we could at least do is ensure ppl get fights.
Nullsec when we can actually own planets if a team dont wanna defend their stuff then ok by me, teams that wanna hold planets would also need to defend it which automatically helps against teams dodging too much |
Nomed Deeps
The Exemplars
91
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:00:00 -
[14] - Quote
There should at least be a Private option or The War Room board is useless as the point of The War Room board is to schedule matches between corps. Like it is, two corps can agree upon a contract and schedule a time on The War Room board yet a third corp move in and accept it (blocking the intended corp) as the contract and time had been posted on The War Room.
BTW, this should most likely be moved to the Feedback/Request board. |
fahrenheitM
Pro Hic Immortalis
RISE of LEGION
212
|
Posted - 2012.12.06 15:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
hah, ya we had a corp contract up specifically to fight a corp, however SI grabbed it immediately before the other could. It happens. |
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |