DUST Search - [Request] Corp deploy for public Skirmish and Ambush

Bendtner92 wrote:

843 pano wrote:

^ Settle down there tough nuts. Sorry for dropping too much lead on your head, I think I knocked a few gears loose on ya. I'll keep an eye out for ya on the field and see how you like the taste of my 2700 shield SAGA with proto turret. Just a reminder, we're here to test things and break them. Then, they get fixed. BTW, I'm skilled in vehicles, what do you expect me to do? And I've never abused RE's, I didn't like them. Tower camper... guilty as charged :-)

Clan deploy in public matchs works in MAG, so it should work here in DUST. Your ASSuming that the other team won't have corps in it too, which is a falsehood. With the number of corps in now, it's a sure thing you'll be up against 1-3 corp squads on the opposing side. Like in MAG, 4 squads are deployed on each side, some are formed squads and some are randoms. This is true on both sides and the game play is pretty equal. I can tell you've never played MAG, so don't judge something unless you've actually done it. MAG has it and it works well.

MAG had it but even if you had 32 guys in a Domination match there would still be up to 96 other randoms. Also there were a bigger chance at having another squad deployed on the enemy team.

In Dust, if you deploy 16 people into a game, the chance of having another corp with 16 people on the other side is probably less than slim.

Nobody would want this as it would be a pubstomp every single game. Try and deploy 32 guys in Sabotage in MAG and then come back and tell me you had a fun match.

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.11.14 16:32:00 - [1] - Quote When we have two to three squads going in the corp and we try to sink deploy into the same game so we can fight together, we almost always end up on opposing sides. I don't enjoy killing my corp mates and costing them ISK, or visa versa. Can we please have a corp deploy for public Skirmish and Ambush games that puts us all on the same fighting side? We need to practice fighting together, not against each other. Thanks
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.11.14 18:40:00 - [2] - Quote After 51 views, I guess most of you all like fighting against your corp team mates and not practicing corp multi squad strategies in public games. My bad.
EnglishSnake Zumari Force Projection Caldari State 1012	Posted - 2012.11.14 18:43:00 - [3] - Quote lol you will really get far fielding 16guys against 16 randoms who dont know each other use mics or any teamwork whatsoever
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.11.14 18:52:00 - [4] - Quote Right now most of my corp mates are DUST noobs, just coming over from MAG. So being able to do a corp deploy and work together would be a great option to have. Plus, like in MAG, you will have 2-3 clan squads and a squad or two of randoms on each side. As more clans/corps deploy together you will have more corps vs/ corps dominant game play.
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 401	Posted - 2012.11.14 20:08:00 - [5] - Quote 843 pano wrote: After 51 views, I guess most of you all like fighting against your corp team mates and not practicing corp multi squad strategies in public games. My bad. No. Those that have a pair just do CORPORATION versus CORPORATION and they then learn from the results. But YOU want to roflstomp a bunch of RANDOMS?? GTFO!!!! Then I see your tag ummm hummm tower camper when DS were free militia, SL abuser, RE abuser, Sagaris abuser when they were unstoppable in E3 build, recently seen in a Gunnlogi or a Myron abusing the turret damage. So heres my IMHO last word on your request asking to ABUSE a bunch of RANDOMS: Nope! In case I was unclear. HELLLL NOOOO!!!!
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.11.14 21:26:00 - [6] - Quote ^ Settle down there tough nuts. Sorry for dropping too much lead on your head, I think I knocked a few gears loose on ya. I'll keep an eye out for ya on the field and see how you like the taste of my 2700 shield SAGA with proto turret. Just a reminder, we're here to test things and break them. Then, they get fixed. BTW, I'm skilled in vehicles, what do you expect me to do? And I've never abused RE's, I didn't like them. Tower camper... guilty as charged :-) Clan deploy in public matchs works in MAG, so it should work here in DUST. Your ASSuming that the other team won't have corps in it too, which is a falsehood. With the number of corps in now, it's a sure thing you'll be up against 1-3 corp squads on the opposing side. Like in MAG, 4 squads are deployed on each side, some are formed squads and some are randoms. This is true on both sides and the game play is pretty equal. I can tell you've never played MAG, so don't judge something unless you've actually done it. MAG has it and it works well.
Bendtner92 Imperfects Negative-Feedback 369	Posted - 2012.11.14 21:35:00 - [7] - Quote 843 pano wrote: ^ Settle down there tough nuts. Sorry for dropping too much lead on your head, I think I knocked a few gears loose on ya. I'll keep an eye out for ya on the field and see how you like the taste of my 2700 shield SAGA with proto turret. Just a reminder, we're here to test things and break them. Then, they get fixed. BTW, I'm skilled in vehicles, what do you expect me to do? And I've never abused RE's, I didn't like them. Tower camper... guilty as charged :-) Clan deploy in public matchs works in MAG, so it should work here in DUST. Your ASSuming that the other team won't have corps in it too, which is a falsehood. With the number of corps in now, it's a sure thing you'll be up against 1-3 corp squads on the opposing side. Like in MAG, 4 squads are deployed on each side, some are formed squads and some are randoms. This is true on both sides and the game play is pretty equal. I can tell you've never played MAG, so don't judge something unless you've actually done it. MAG has it and it works well. MAG had it but even if you had 32 guys in a Domination match there would still be up to 96 other randoms. Also there were a bigger chance at having another squad deployed on the enemy team. In Dust, if you deploy 16 people into a game, the chance of having another corp with 16 people on the other side is probably less than slim. Nobody would want this as it would be a pubstomp every single game. Try and deploy 32 guys in Sabotage in MAG and then come back and tell me you had a fun match.
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 401	Posted - 2012.11.14 22:05:00 - [8] - Quote 843 pano wrote: ^ Settle down there tough nuts. Sorry for dropping too much lead on your head, I think I knocked a few gears loose on ya. I'll keep an eye out for ya on the field and see how you like the taste of my 2700 shield SAGA with proto turret. Just a reminder, we're here to test things and break them. Then, they get fixed. BTW, I'm skilled in vehicles, what do you expect me to do? And I've never abused RE's, I didn't like them. Tower camper... guilty as charged :-) Clan deploy in public matchs works in MAG, so it should work here in DUST. Your ASSuming that the other team won't have corps in it too, which is a falsehood. With the number of corps in now, it's a sure thing you'll be up against 1-3 corp squads on the opposing side. Like in MAG, 4 squads are deployed on each side, some are formed squads and some are randoms. This is true on both sides and the game play is pretty equal. I can tell you've never played MAG, so don't judge something unless you've actually done it. MAG has it and it works well. Guristas Saga?? They die from advanced flux grenades and a swarm or two. But hey bring it since vehicle popcorn is always fun. And seeing three kills at the same time is fun. MAG?? That broken game by Zipper Interactive?? That concept worked so "well". Mag is dead. Zipper is dead. Guess folks dislike broken and unbalanced games. Getting stomped over and over leads to folks no longer playing. You already have the ability to deploy in a cohesive unit. Its called CORPORATION Contracts. ITS WRONG!!! asking to pubstomp newbs over and over.
Tech Ohm Eaven L.O.T.I.S. Legacy Rising 401	Posted - 2012.11.14 22:11:00 - [9] - Quote Bendtner92 wrote: 843 pano wrote: ^ Settle down there tough nuts. Sorry for dropping too much lead on your head, I think I knocked a few gears loose on ya. I'll keep an eye out for ya on the field and see how you like the taste of my 2700 shield SAGA with proto turret. Just a reminder, we're here to test things and break them. Then, they get fixed. BTW, I'm skilled in vehicles, what do you expect me to do? And I've never abused RE's, I didn't like them. Tower camper... guilty as charged :-) Clan deploy in public matchs works in MAG, so it should work here in DUST. Your ASSuming that the other team won't have corps in it too, which is a falsehood. With the number of corps in now, it's a sure thing you'll be up against 1-3 corp squads on the opposing side. Like in MAG, 4 squads are deployed on each side, some are formed squads and some are randoms. This is true on both sides and the game play is pretty equal. I can tell you've never played MAG, so don't judge something unless you've actually done it. MAG has it and it works well. MAG had it but even if you had 32 guys in a Domination match there would still be up to 96 other randoms. Also there were a bigger chance at having another squad deployed on the enemy team. In Dust, if you deploy 16 people into a game, the chance of having another corp with 16 people on the other side is probably less than slim. Nobody would want this as it would be a pubstomp every single game. Try and deploy 32 guys in Sabotage in MAG and then come back and tell me you had a fun match. Agreed. I played my World Tour of Sevr, Valor and Raven. That game was brilliant in concept but oh so broken in maps and weapon balance.
semperfi1999 Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 317	Posted - 2012.11.14 22:29:00 - [10] - Quote MAG was a game that was a great idea and it was a great vision for games to strive for. But they failed in actual application of this by patches that destroyed the game. If they didnt have the 1.3 patch that basically killed the player numbers then it probably would have done a whole lot better. Instead they destroyed the game with 1.3 and spent the next 6 months trying to recover what they destroyed while losing more and more players every patch. I stopped playing MAG when the lag became too unbearable to play anymore because they kept getting rid of servers till they only had a few servers running. My hope for Dust is that they do things right. Do not make massive game changing adjustments after the game has came out. Not that things cant be added or tweaked but making huge adjustments that are not needed suddenly will destroy the player base very quickly. So far I really enjoy Dust and even more so the potential that Dust has. If CCP can continue to make good changes and not do too many bad changes (like nerfing straff speed) then I think this game will definitely succeed.

KAGEHOSHI Horned Wolf Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 3064	Posted - 2012.11.14 22:42:00 - [11] - Quote I would love a corp deploy feature, even if it isn't usable in close highsec to prevent corps stomping randoms.
Mavado V Noriega SyNergy Gaming 2283	Posted - 2012.11.15 00:17:00 - [12] - Quote EnglishSnake wrote: lol you will really get far fielding 16guys against 16 randoms who dont know each other use mics or any teamwork whatsoever shhhhh dont tell them that this is the delusion MAG clans are under that teamstackin randoms makes them better seen it even carried over to BF3 as well lol
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.11.15 00:29:00 - [13] - Quote The funny thing is, I didn't even think about team stomping randoms when I first posted this, I do that well enough with one team mate and my myron, LAV or HAV. If you read my original post, I'm just tired of fighting my corp mates when we try to sink deploy. Once we get everyone from MAG onto DUST and all skilled up, we'll be doing corp battles. Until then it looks like we'll be fighting each other, which I think is lame.
843 pano 843 Boot Camp 200	Posted - 2012.11.15 00:33:00 - [14] - Quote edit: double post
Sleepy Zan Internal Error. Negative-Feedback 2048	Posted - 2012.11.15 01:01:00 - [15] - Quote Pub Stomping GO!!!!


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page