DUST Search - lI thought this game was 48 players

All Channels

General Discussions

lI thought this game was 48 players

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2012.10.07 08:40:00 - [1] - Quote Lol why is it 32? Did they change they mind or something?
Gcember Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 123	Posted - 2012.10.07 08:44:00 - [2] - Quote They are planning for even bigger numbers.
Ayures II Subdreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 103	Posted - 2012.10.07 08:47:00 - [3] - Quote They've been doing some internal testing all the way up to 128.
Keradil Ledeuxieme Doomheim 24	Posted - 2012.10.07 08:50:00 - [4] - Quote B-E-T-A
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2012.10.07 08:55:00 - [5] - Quote Ayures II wrote: They've been doing some internal testing all the way up to 128. Lol that sound Kool, but why not test it in the beta? Ain't that what we here for?
HK-40 120	Posted - 2012.10.07 08:57:00 - [6] - Quote I really think they need to sort out the framerate lag before they worry about adding more players. But more would be good, down the track.
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2012.10.07 09:03:00 - [7] - Quote HK-40 wrote: I really think they need to sort out the framerate lag before they worry about adding more players. But more would be good, down the track. Shouldnt they add the players then work on the issues? Lol instead of like they doing now? What if they fix it for 32 players? Wouldn't they have to fix it again for 48 players once they add them?
HK-40 120	Posted - 2012.10.07 09:04:00 - [8] - Quote DON RODIE II wrote: HK-40 wrote: I really think they need to sort out the framerate lag before they worry about adding more players. But more would be good, down the track. Shouldnt they add the players then work on the issues? Lol instead of like they doing now? What if they fix it for 32 players? Wouldn't they have to fix it again for 48 players once they add them? How does 'no' sound? Do I really need to explain why.
Odiain Suliis ZionTCD Legacy Rising 112	Posted - 2012.10.07 09:09:00 - [9] - Quote DON RODIE II wrote: HK-40 wrote: I really think they need to sort out the framerate lag before they worry about adding more players. But more would be good, down the track. Shouldnt they add the players then work on the issues? Lol instead of like they doing now? What if they fix it for 32 players? Wouldn't they have to fix it again for 48 players once they add them? That is double-edged sword. The more players there are, sure the problems compound and come more prominant but if we are completely unable to play and test things due to horrendously low fps issues and lag etc. then whats the point. By testing with lower numbers there are some kinks and fps/lag issues are present but not so much so that all of us stop playeing because of it.
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2012.10.07 09:22:00 - [10] - Quote HK-40 wrote: DON RODIE II wrote: HK-40 wrote: I really think they need to sort out the framerate lag before they worry about adding more players. But more would be good, down the track. Shouldnt they add the players then work on the issues? Lol instead of like they doing now? What if they fix it for 32 players? Wouldn't they have to fix it again for 48 players once they add them? How does 'no' sound? Do I really need to explain why. Lol no, I doubt that u could. I was hoping someone else would though. It would of been Kool if someone from ccp did. But they probably all sleep

Kleanur Guy SyNergy Gaming 154	Posted - 2012.10.07 09:28:00 - [11] - Quote Keradil Ledeuxieme wrote: B-E-T-A This.
fenrir storm Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 314	Posted - 2012.10.07 10:08:00 - [12] - Quote Ayures II wrote: They've been doing some internal testing all the way up to 128. Can't wait for the lag and frame rate drop on those matches
Codename Bear Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 8	Posted - 2012.10.07 10:22:00 - [13] - Quote It's all about net code and optimizing. I think when PS4 comes out we'll be able to see stable games running with 256 or higher players. The graphics on a high end PC for this game are phenomenal, so it's exciting to see what we'll get for the PS4.
Brahma El Indio Bragian Order Amarr Empire 171	Posted - 2012.10.07 11:38:00 - [14] - Quote More the merrier as they say.... They gotta hit 128vs128, at least, that would be good.... Start small, like they have, build it up slowly, they'll get there...
Salazar Skye-fire Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 85	Posted - 2012.10.07 12:04:00 - [15] - Quote DON RODIE II wrote: Lol why is it 32? Did they change they mind or something? its been said that if they can they will increase it. not to many games on console support numbers bigger than 32, there's a few who do but sacrifice graphics or something to achieve it. if and when the ps4 drops (2015ish?) we could see a major increase by then to numbers around or larger than 64 if hardware specs can handle them.
STYLIE77 KILL-EM-QUICK RISE of LEGION 60	Posted - 2012.10.07 12:12:00 - [16] - Quote DON RODIE II wrote: Ayures II wrote: They've been doing some internal testing all the way up to 128. Lol that sound Kool, but why not test it in the beta? Ain't that what we here for? Yes it is. My clan was used to test a clan deploy system on MAG that supported well over 32 players at one time due to our size. Internal testing is the first part, but then at some point they will have to "go live" and test it on the live server. It is at that point that we as beta testers will get to help CCP by testing it.
cranium79 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 38	Posted - 2012.10.07 13:26:00 - [17] - Quote there aren't enough people on sisi to run numbers much bigger than 16 vs 16 right now. 1200 people at most are on. the more battles going on, the more data they can collect. http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/server_status.php ... then again 32 vs 32 would be nice. i hate bringing it up, but it's the best comparison... just look at MAG right now. barely 1000 people on at any give time (and that was the last time i played like 2 months ago), and you could almost NEVER get into the 256 player Domination maps, let alone the 128 player Acquisition maps. also, sisi is having enough problems dealing with 32 people on a map right now (especially in the 5 point maps). i'm sure we'll see bigger groups when we move to TQ.
Maken Tosch Planetary Response Organisation Test Friends Please Ignore 1591	Posted - 2012.10.07 13:29:00 - [18] - Quote CCP did say they would like see such high number of players, but they also said they will do things one step at a time. They are new to the fps market after since they are an mmo company.
Salazar Skye-fire Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 85	Posted - 2012.10.07 13:52:00 - [19] - Quote cranium79 wrote: there aren't enough people on sisi to run numbers much bigger than 16 vs 16 right now. 1200 people at most are on. the more battles going on, the more data they can collect. http://games.chruker.dk/eve_online/server_status.php ... then again 32 vs 32 would be nice. i hate bringing it up, but it's the best comparison... just look at MAG right now. barely 1000 people on at any give time (and that was the last time i played like 2 months ago), and you could almost NEVER get into the 256 player Domination maps, let alone the 128 player Acquisition maps. also, sisi is having enough problems dealing with 32 people on a map right now (especially in the 5 point maps). i'm sure we'll see bigger groups when we move to TQ. though i have been on hiatus far longer than 2 months, its never been hard to get an Aquisition match going it would be your standard queue for any typical game. most ppl saw numbers in a game so they added it to multi-queue or they just straight queued for the game, domo on another hand at most would take 2hrs to queue for a game. 2 reasons i havnt picked it back up, community died and game quality deteriorated
Icy Tiger 63	Posted - 2012.10.07 13:55:00 - [20] - Quote Lol isn't this a beta? Derp.

cranium79 ZionTCD Legacy Rising 38	Posted - 2012.10.07 14:16:00 - [21] - Quote yes, this is a beta, which is why i don't mind 16 vs 16 and all the bugs. my guess, and this is pure speculation, is that if this build goes good, we'll... 1) be open beta (and TQ) by the beginning of November, and if that goes well... 2) released sometime in December as promised 4th quarter 2012. my only real question is, will we be wiped when we move to TQ and open beta? i know we'll be wiped before the release.
DON RODIE II Deep Space Republic 168	Posted - 2012.10.07 20:53:00 - [22] - Quote Codename Bear wrote: It's all about net code and optimizing. I think when PS4 comes out we'll be able to see stable games running with 256 or higher players. The graphics on a high end PC for this game are phenomenal, so it's exciting to see what we'll get for the PS4. Lol what are u talking about? Did u play this game on pc or something?


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.