DUST Search - [Suggestion] let the players punish sp-boosters

All Channels

Feedback/Requests

[Suggestion] let the players punish sp-boosters

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 :: [one page]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Unit-775 Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 36	Posted - 2012.10.03 11:14:00 - [1] - Quote I'm fed up with these lousy SP Boosters. So how about this: 1. If someone remote reps an x amount behind the red line of his base, he gets criminal flagged and his teammates can shoot him. explanation of criminal flag: He can be shot at and after someone did shoot at him he can fire back at the aggressor. Only after he took damage, Friendly Fire gets turned on on both him and the one who shot at him. This keeps people abusing the system for team killing. 2. after an additional x amount of remote repping behind the red line of their base, the red line on the base gets dropped and the enemy can move in. So you if they wont stop their cheaters, they possible get a little spawn-camped as bonus reward. The x amount has to be adjusted to make sure its not triggered by someone who isn't sp boosting.
Mira Adari Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 79	Posted - 2012.10.03 11:28:00 - [2] - Quote LIke it.
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 775	Posted - 2012.10.03 11:42:00 - [3] - Quote I like the cut of your gib. One more aspect if I may. When these things are happening the team should get a notice so that they're aware someone is flagged and they're warned before the redline drops
HK-40 120	Posted - 2012.10.03 11:53:00 - [4] - Quote Friendly Fire should be open at all times tbh. Flagging in low and null seems pointless. I'm willing to admit that in high sec friendly fire should be limited to criminal acts - I suppose i'm looking at the EVE model here.
Unit-775 Villore Sec Ops Gallente Federation 36	Posted - 2012.10.03 11:55:00 - [5] - Quote HK-40 wrote: Friendly Fire should be open at all times tbh. i completely agree with you on this one.
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 775	Posted - 2012.10.03 12:19:00 - [6] - Quote Currently FF is slated for OFF in High Sec, ON in Null Sec (after it's enabled post launch), currently planed to be ON in Low Sec for FW. I could be in error but I think it'll be harder to get CCP to change their game plan on FF as a whole than to implement the suggested fix from the OP. 0.02 ISK Cross
Dzark Kill Tronhadar Free Guard Minmatar Republic 115	Posted - 2012.10.03 16:04:00 - [7] - Quote Agree with the op. But with 1 amendment the cheater should never be able to shoot back. I don't think we should treat cheaters fairly at all, after all they don't consider the negative effects of their actions to the rest of the community. If they want a fight they should leave the safe zone and look for one. It would be funny to not only flag them, but put them in a stock so the community can jeer ans throw stones at them.
KEROSIINI-TERO Seraphim Initiative. CRONOS. 248	Posted - 2012.10.03 21:08:00 - [8] - Quote Very nice idea though a bit complex. the FF part works for these match making battles but not in corp vs corp battles. OFC if there are no unimportant corp battles then even that doesn't matter. +1 because it might help at the moment.
Necrodermis GunFall Mobilization Covert Intervention 460	Posted - 2012.10.03 21:12:00 - [9] - Quote Cross Atu wrote: Currently FF is slated for OFF in High Sec, ON in Null Sec (after it's enabled post launch), currently planed to be ON in Low Sec for FW. I could be in error but I think it'll be harder to get CCP to change their game plan on FF as a whole than to implement the suggested fix from the OP. 0.02 ISK Cross i didn't know there were high sec planets that were going to be apart of the 'factional warfare' everyone said it is just going to be a null/low sec only. unless there are PVE missions that are in the works.
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 775	Posted - 2012.10.04 02:49:00 - [10] - Quote Necrodermis wrote: Cross Atu wrote: Currently FF is slated for OFF in High Sec, ON in Null Sec (after it's enabled post launch), currently planed to be ON in Low Sec for FW. I could be in error but I think it'll be harder to get CCP to change their game plan on FF as a whole than to implement the suggested fix from the OP. 0.02 ISK Cross i didn't know there were high sec planets that were going to be apart of the 'factional warfare' everyone said it is just going to be a null/low sec only. unless there are PVE missions that are in the works. It is my understanding that High Sec and Low Sec are planned for launch. Low Sec is going to be the FW area and High Sec is going to be "instant battle" (aka pretty much what we have in beta). FW will have more Corp v Corp style play and will effect things within the FW system (like zone control, LP etc. I don't know the details), the Low (and later Null) Sec play will be funded by Corp (i.e. Player) contracts while the High Sec play will be NPC funded (like running missions in EVE).

Lixet The Craniac Naloran Project 50	Posted - 2012.10.04 03:09:00 - [11] - Quote Add a simple Vote / Kick system?
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 775	Posted - 2012.10.04 04:53:00 - [12] - Quote Decrease crash damage (specifically crash damage not all damage) across the board for vehicles/ships thus directly decreasing the rewards of farming. This also does not harm legit Logies since everyone (embarked or no) in the active fight will be taking damage anyway so the "loss" of rep point awards will be trivial.
chuckuall RestlessSpirits 16	Posted - 2012.10.04 07:46:00 - [13] - Quote How about no sp for collision damage,, that's easy fix.
Cross Atu Conspiratus Immortalis 775	Posted - 2012.10.04 07:52:00 - [14] - Quote chuckuall wrote: How about no sp for collision damage,, that's easy fix. The problem there is that without a decrease in the actual collision damage that change would legit players both Logi and Pilot (be that ground or air). We need something that hurts the value of farming without reducing the value of legit play actions.
Fasjh Sanmatar Kelkoons Minmatar Republic 32	Posted - 2012.10.04 08:33:00 - [15] - Quote what about removing leaderboards for individual players? Dust is supposedly a team/corp game, therefore the only leaderboards we actually need are the ones for corps, surely? without a goal to aim for (15 minutes of fame at the top of the leaderboard) wont most of the boosters just give up?
Corban Lahnder ZionTCD Legacy Rising 158	Posted - 2012.10.04 14:13:00 - [16] - Quote Dude just kamikaze a vehicle of equal mass into theres. Problem solved.


Pages: 1 :: [one page]

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online/DUST514, the EVE/DUST514 logo, EVE/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to OMG Labs to use EVE Online/DUST514 and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, OMG Labs. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.